Related papers: The roads to non-individuals (and how not to read their maps)

The roads to non-individuals (and how not to read their maps)

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12997v1
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2023 11:57:09 GMT
Title: The roads to non-individuals (and how not to read their maps)
Authors: Jonas R. B. Arenhart and Raoni W. Arroyo
Abstract summary: We argue that neither non-individuality nor individuality is not to be found imposed on us in any of these levels so that it should be seen as a metaphysical addition to the theory.
Score: 0.0
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Abstract: Ever since its beginnings, standard quantum mechanics has been associated with a metaphysical view according to which the theory deals with non-individual objects, i.e., objects deprived of individuality in some sense of the term. We shall examine the grounds of the claim according to which quantum mechanics is so closely connected with a metaphysics of non-individuals. In particular, we discuss the attempts to learn the required `metaphysical lessons' required by quantum mechanics coming from four distinct roads: from the formalism of the theory, treating separately the case of the physics and the underlying logic; from the ontology of the theory, understood as the furniture of the world according to the theory; and, at last, we analyze whether a metaphysics of non-individuals is indispensable from a purely metaphysical point of view. We argue that neither non-individuality nor individuality is not to be found imposed on us in any of these levels so that it should be seen as a metaphysical addition to the theory, rather than as a lesson from it.

Related papers

The elimination of metaphysics through the epistemological analysis: lessons (un)learned from metaphysical underdetermination [0.0]
This chapter argues that the general philosophy of science should learn metaphilosophical lessons from metaphysics of metaphysical underdetermination. Case 2 presents the traditional discussion of metaphysical underdetermination regarding the individuality and-individuality of quantum particles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-30T12:51:35Z)
Intrinsic Physical Concepts Discovery with Object-Centric Predictive Models [86.25460882547581]
We introduce the PHYsical Concepts Inference NEtwork (PHYCINE), a system that infers physical concepts in different abstract levels without supervision. We show that object representations containing the discovered physical concepts variables could help achieve better performance in causal reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-03T11:52:21Z)
General framework of quantum complementarity from a measurement-based perspective [6.073419957391949]
We develop a framework for demonstrating quantum complementarity in the form of information exclusion relations. We explore the applications of our theory in entanglement witnessing and elucidate that our IERs lead to an extended form of entropic uncertainty relations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-03T14:20:52Z)
A new interpretation of quantum theory, based on a bundle-theoretic view of objective idealism [0.0]
The 'weirdness' of quantum theory can be understood to derive from a vanishing distinguishability of indiscernible particles. The claim is made that quantum theory can be interpreted in an intelligible way by positing a bundle-theoretic view of objective idealism instead of materialism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-22T12:15:04Z)
Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
Testing quantum theory with thought experiments [4.847980206213335]
How should one model systems that include agents who are themselves using quantum theory? We give a state-of-the-art overview on quantum thought experiments involving observers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-09T18:08:23Z)
Self-adjointness in Quantum Mechanics: a pedagogical path [77.34726150561087]
This paper aims to make quantum observables emerge as necessarily self-adjoint, and not merely hermitian operators. Next to the central core of our line of reasoning, the necessity of a non-trivial declaration of a domain to associate with the formal action of an observable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-28T21:19:33Z)
Floating free from physics: the metaphysics of quantum mechanics [0.0]
We argue that, in this perspective, metaphysics must be understood as an autonomous discipline. One of the main motivations of such project is the obtaining of a scientifically respectable justification for the attribution of a single true metaphysical profile to the posits of a scientific theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-10T16:53:21Z)
Measuring Quantum Superpositions (Or, "It is only the theory which decides what can be observed.") [0.0]
We argue that the ad hoc introduction of the projection postulate (or measurement rule) can be understood as a necessary requirement coming from a naive empiricist standpoint. We discuss the general physical conditions for measuring and observing quantum superpositions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-02T14:30:56Z)
Preferred basis, decoherence and a quantum state of the Universe [77.34726150561087]
We review a number of issues in foundations of quantum theory and quantum cosmology. These issues can be considered as a part of the scientific legacy of H.D. Zeh.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-28T18:07:59Z)
The Dilemma of Quantum Individuality Beyond Particle Metaphysics [0.0]
It is commonly claimed that quantum mechanics makes reference to a microscopic realm constituted by elementary particles. It is not at all clear what these quantum particles really are.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-15T20:25:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.