Label Noise: Correcting the Forward-Correction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.13100v2
• Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 16:30:06 GMT
• Title: Label Noise: Correcting the Forward-Correction
• Authors: William Toner, Amos Storkey,
• Abstract summary: Training neural network classifiers on datasets with label noise poses a risk of overfitting them to the noisy labels. We propose an approach to tackling overfitting caused by label noise. Motivated by this observation, we propose imposing a lower bound on the training loss to mitigate overfitting.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Training neural network classifiers on datasets with label noise poses a risk of overfitting them to the noisy labels. To address this issue, researchers have explored alternative loss functions that aim to be more robust. The `forward-correction' is a popular approach wherein the model outputs are noised before being evaluated against noisy data. When the true noise model is known, applying the forward-correction guarantees consistency of the learning algorithm. While providing some benefit, the correction is insufficient to prevent overfitting to finite noisy datasets. In this work, we propose an approach to tackling overfitting caused by label noise. We observe that the presence of label noise implies a lower bound on the noisy generalised risk. Motivated by this observation, we propose imposing a lower bound on the training loss to mitigate overfitting. Our main contribution is providing theoretical insights that allow us to approximate the lower bound given only an estimate of the average noise rate. We empirically demonstrate that using this bound significantly enhances robustness in various settings, with virtually no additional computational cost.

Related papers

• SoftPatch: Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Noisy Data [67.38948127630644]
  This paper considers label-level noise in image sensory anomaly detection for the first time. We propose a memory-based unsupervised AD method, SoftPatch, which efficiently denoises the data at the patch level. Compared with existing methods, SoftPatch maintains a strong modeling ability of normal data and alleviates the overconfidence problem in coreset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T08:49:34Z)
• Learning to Correct Noisy Labels for Fine-Grained Entity Typing via Co-Prediction Prompt Tuning [9.885278527023532]
  We introduce Co-Prediction Prompt Tuning for noise correction in FET. We integrate prediction results to recall labeled labels and utilize a differentiated margin to identify inaccurate labels. Experimental results on three widely-used FET datasets demonstrate that our noise correction approach significantly enhances the quality of training samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T06:04:07Z)
• Latent Class-Conditional Noise Model [54.56899309997246]
  We introduce a Latent Class-Conditional Noise model (LCCN) to parameterize the noise transition under a Bayesian framework. We then deduce a dynamic label regression method for LCCN, whose Gibbs sampler allows us efficiently infer the latent true labels. Our approach safeguards the stable update of the noise transition, which avoids previous arbitrarily tuning from a mini-batch of samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-19T15:24:37Z)
• Is your noise correction noisy? PLS: Robustness to label noise with two stage detection [16.65296285599679]
  This paper proposes to improve the correction accuracy of noisy samples once they have been detected. In many state-of-the-art contributions, a two phase approach is adopted where the noisy samples are detected before guessing a corrected pseudo-label. We propose the pseudo-loss, a simple metric that we find to be strongly correlated with pseudo-label correctness on noisy samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-10T11:32:28Z)
• Neighborhood Collective Estimation for Noisy Label Identification and Correction [92.20697827784426]
  Learning with noisy labels (LNL) aims at designing strategies to improve model performance and generalization by mitigating the effects of model overfitting to noisy labels. Recent advances employ the predicted label distributions of individual samples to perform noise verification and noisy label correction, easily giving rise to confirmation bias. We propose Neighborhood Collective Estimation, in which the predictive reliability of a candidate sample is re-estimated by contrasting it against its feature-space nearest neighbors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-05T14:47:22Z)
• Robustness and reliability when training with noisy labels [12.688634089849023]
  Labelling of data for supervised learning can be costly and time-consuming. Deep neural networks have proved capable of fitting random labels, regularisation and the use of robust loss functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T10:30:20Z)
• Open-set Label Noise Can Improve Robustness Against Inherent Label Noise [27.885927200376386]
  We show that open-set noisy labels can be non-toxic and even benefit the robustness against inherent noisy labels. We propose a simple yet effective regularization by introducing Open-set samples with Dynamic Noisy Labels (ODNL) into training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-21T07:15:50Z)
• Tackling Instance-Dependent Label Noise via a Universal Probabilistic Model [80.91927573604438]
  This paper proposes a simple yet universal probabilistic model, which explicitly relates noisy labels to their instances. Experiments on datasets with both synthetic and real-world label noise verify that the proposed method yields significant improvements on robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-14T05:43:51Z)
• A Second-Order Approach to Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise [58.555527517928596]
  The presence of label noise often misleads the training of deep neural networks. We show that the errors in human-annotated labels are more likely to be dependent on the difficulty levels of tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-22T06:36:58Z)
• Improving Face Recognition by Clustering Unlabeled Faces in the Wild [77.48677160252198]
  We propose a novel identity separation method based on extreme value theory. It greatly reduces the problems caused by overlapping-identity label noise. Experiments on both controlled and real settings demonstrate our method's consistent improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T12:26:50Z)
• NoiseRank: Unsupervised Label Noise Reduction with Dependence Models [11.08987870095179]
  We propose NoiseRank, for unsupervised label noise reduction using Markov Random Fields (MRF) We construct a dependence model to estimate the posterior probability of an instance being incorrectly labeled given the dataset, and rank instances based on their estimated probabilities. NoiseRank improves state-of-the-art classification on Food101-N (20% noise) and is effective on high noise Clothing-1M (40% noise)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-15T01:10:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.