Investigating the Robustness of Sequential Recommender Systems Against Training Data Perturbations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.13165v2
• Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 13:41:16 GMT
• Title: Investigating the Robustness of Sequential Recommender Systems Against Training Data Perturbations
• Authors: Filippo Betello, Federico Siciliano, Pushkar Mishra, Fabrizio Silvestri
• Abstract summary: We introduce Finite Rank-Biased Overlap (FRBO), an enhanced similarity tailored explicitly for finite rankings. We empirically investigate the impact of removing items at different positions within a temporally ordered sequence. Our results demonstrate that removing items at the end of the sequence has a statistically significant impact on performance.
• Score: 9.463133630647569
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Sequential Recommender Systems (SRSs) are widely employed to model user behavior over time. However, their robustness in the face of perturbations in training data remains a largely understudied yet critical issue. A fundamental challenge emerges in previous studies aimed at assessing the robustness of SRSs: the Rank-Biased Overlap (RBO) similarity is not particularly suited for this task as it is designed for infinite rankings of items and thus shows limitations in real-world scenarios. For instance, it fails to achieve a perfect score of 1 for two identical finite-length rankings. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel contribution: Finite Rank-Biased Overlap (FRBO), an enhanced similarity tailored explicitly for finite rankings. This innovation facilitates a more intuitive evaluation in practical settings. In pursuit of our goal, we empirically investigate the impact of removing items at different positions within a temporally ordered sequence. We evaluate two distinct SRS models across multiple datasets, measuring their performance using metrics such as Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG) and Rank List Sensitivity. Our results demonstrate that removing items at the end of the sequence has a statistically significant impact on performance, with NDCG decreasing up to 60%. Conversely, removing items from the beginning or middle has no significant effect. These findings underscore the criticality of the position of perturbed items in the training data. As we spotlight the vulnerabilities inherent in current SRSs, we fervently advocate for intensified research efforts to fortify their robustness against adversarial perturbations.

Related papers

• LLMs are Biased Evaluators But Not Biased for Retrieval Augmented Generation [28.61326111959728]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibit significant biases in evaluation tasks, particularly in preferentially rating and favoring self-generated content. Our study addresses this knowledge gap by simulating two critical phases of the retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework. Contrary to previous findings, our results reveal no significant self-preference effect in RAG frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T08:32:09Z)
• Long-Sequence Recommendation Models Need Decoupled Embeddings [49.410906935283585]
  We identify and characterize a neglected deficiency in existing long-sequence recommendation models. A single set of embeddings struggles with learning both attention and representation, leading to interference between these two processes. We propose the Decoupled Attention and Representation Embeddings (DARE) model, where two distinct embedding tables are learned separately to fully decouple attention and representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T15:45:15Z)
• PEAR: Position-Embedding-Agnostic Attention Re-weighting Enhances Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Zero Inference Overhead [24.611413814466978]
  Large language models (LLMs) enhanced with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) have introduced a new paradigm for web search. Existing methods to enhance context awareness are often inefficient, incurring time or memory overhead during inference. We propose Position-Embedding-Agnostic attention Re-weighting (PEAR) which enhances the context awareness of LLMs with zero inference overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T15:40:54Z)
• Bidirectional Decoding: Improving Action Chunking via Closed-Loop Resampling [51.38330727868982]
  Bidirectional Decoding (BID) is a test-time inference algorithm that bridges action chunking with closed-loop operations. We show that BID boosts the performance of two state-of-the-art generative policies across seven simulation benchmarks and two real-world tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T15:39:34Z)
• Dissecting Deep RL with High Update Ratios: Combatting Value Divergence [21.282292112642747]
  We show that deep reinforcement learning algorithms can retain their ability to learn without resetting network parameters. We employ a simple unit-ball normalization that enables learning under large update ratios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-09T19:56:40Z)
• REValueD: Regularised Ensemble Value-Decomposition for Factorisable Markov Decision Processes [7.2129390689756185]
  Discrete-action reinforcement learning algorithms often falter in tasks with high-dimensional discrete action spaces. This study delves deep into the effects of value-decomposition, revealing that it amplifies target variance. We introduce a regularisation loss that helps to mitigate the effects that exploratory actions in one dimension can have on the value of optimal actions in other dimensions. Our novel algorithm, REValueD, tested on discretised versions of the DeepMind Control Suite tasks, showcases superior performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T21:47:23Z)
• Perturbation-Invariant Adversarial Training for Neural Ranking Models: Improving the Effectiveness-Robustness Trade-Off [107.35833747750446]
  adversarial examples can be crafted by adding imperceptible perturbations to legitimate documents. This vulnerability raises significant concerns about their reliability and hinders the widespread deployment of NRMs. In this study, we establish theoretical guarantees regarding the effectiveness-robustness trade-off in NRMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-16T05:38:39Z)
• Re-Evaluating LiDAR Scene Flow for Autonomous Driving [80.37947791534985]
  Popular benchmarks for self-supervised LiDAR scene flow have unrealistic rates of dynamic motion, unrealistic correspondences, and unrealistic sampling patterns. We evaluate a suite of top methods on a suite of real-world datasets. We show that despite the emphasis placed on learning, most performance gains are caused by pre- and post-processing steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T22:45:50Z)
• ReAct: Temporal Action Detection with Relational Queries [84.76646044604055]
  This work aims at advancing temporal action detection (TAD) using an encoder-decoder framework with action queries. We first propose a relational attention mechanism in the decoder, which guides the attention among queries based on their relations. Lastly, we propose to predict the localization quality of each action query at inference in order to distinguish high-quality queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-14T17:46:37Z)
• Scale-Equivalent Distillation for Semi-Supervised Object Detection [57.59525453301374]
  Recent Semi-Supervised Object Detection (SS-OD) methods are mainly based on self-training, generating hard pseudo-labels by a teacher model on unlabeled data as supervisory signals. We analyze the challenges these methods meet with the empirical experiment results. We introduce a novel approach, Scale-Equivalent Distillation (SED), which is a simple yet effective end-to-end knowledge distillation framework robust to large object size variance and class imbalance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-23T07:33:37Z)
• Enhancing Counterfactual Classification via Self-Training [9.484178349784264]
  We propose a self-training algorithm which imputes outcomes with categorical values for finite unseen actions in observational data to simulate a randomized trial through pseudolabeling. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms on both synthetic and real datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-08T18:42:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.