An Empirical Study of Large-Scale Data-Driven Full Waveform Inversion

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15388v2
• Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 20:01:02 GMT
• Title: An Empirical Study of Large-Scale Data-Driven Full Waveform Inversion
• Authors: Peng Jin, Yinan Feng, Shihang Feng, Hanchen Wang, Yinpeng Chen, Benjamin Consolvo, Zicheng Liu, Youzuo Lin,
• Abstract summary: This paper investigates the impact of big data on deep learning models to help solve the full waveform inversion (FWI) problem. We train and evaluate the FWI models on a combination of 10 2D subsets in OpenFWI that contain 470K pairs of seismic data and velocity maps in total. Our experiments demonstrate that training on the combined dataset yields an average improvement of 13.03% in MAE, 7.19% in MSE and 1.87% in SSIM.
• Score: 33.19446101601603
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper investigates the impact of big data on deep learning models to help solve the full waveform inversion (FWI) problem. While it is well known that big data can boost the performance of deep learning models in many tasks, its effectiveness has not been validated for FWI. To address this gap, we present an empirical study that investigates how deep learning models in FWI behave when trained on OpenFWI, a collection of large-scale, multi-structural, synthetic datasets published recently. In particular, we train and evaluate the FWI models on a combination of 10 2D subsets in OpenFWI that contain 470K pairs of seismic data and velocity maps in total. Our experiments demonstrate that training on the combined dataset yields an average improvement of 13.03% in MAE, 7.19% in MSE and 1.87% in SSIM compared to each split dataset, and an average improvement of 28.60%, 21.55% and 8.22% in the leave-one-out generalization test. We further demonstrate that model capacity needs to scale in accordance with data size for optimal improvement, where our largest model yields an average improvement of 20.06%, 13.39% and 0.72% compared to the smallest one.

Related papers

• Fisher Information-based Efficient Curriculum Federated Learning with Large Language Models [43.26028399395612]
  We propose a Fisher Information-based Efficient Curriculum Federated Learning framework (FibecFed) with two novel methods. First, we propose a fisher information-based method to adaptively sample data within each device to improve the effectiveness of the FL fine-tuning process. Second, we dynamically select the proper layers for global aggregation and sparse parameters for local update with LoRA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T18:12:18Z)
• A Novel Adaptive Fine-Tuning Algorithm for Multimodal Models: Self-Optimizing Classification and Selection of High-Quality Datasets in Remote Sensing [46.603157010223505]
  We propose an adaptive fine-tuning algorithm for multimodal large models. We train the model on two 3090 GPU using one-third of the GeoChat multimodal remote sensing dataset. The model achieved scores of 89.86 and 77.19 on the UCMerced and AID evaluation datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-20T09:19:46Z)
• Imbalance-Aware Culvert-Sewer Defect Segmentation Using an Enhanced Feature Pyramid Network [1.7466076090043157]
  This paper introduces a deep learning model for the semantic segmentation of culverts and sewer pipes within imbalanced datasets. The model employs strategies like class decomposition and data augmentation to address dataset imbalance. Experimental results on the culvert-sewer defects dataset and a benchmark aerial semantic segmentation drone dataset show that the E-FPN outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T17:40:18Z)
• AutoScale: Automatic Prediction of Compute-optimal Data Composition for Training LLMs [61.13296177652599]
  This paper demonstrates that the optimal composition of training data from different domains is scale-dependent. We introduce *AutoScale*, a novel, practical approach for optimizing data compositions at potentially large training data scales. Our evaluation on GPT-2 Large and BERT pre-training demonstrates *AutoScale*'s effectiveness in improving training convergence and downstream performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T17:06:30Z)
• SmallToLarge (S2L): Scalable Data Selection for Fine-tuning Large Language Models by Summarizing Training Trajectories of Small Models [25.354520724493845]
  We introduce an effective and scalable data selection method for supervised fine-tuning. We show that S2L significantly improves data efficiency in SFT for mathematical problem-solving. We also show that S2L can perform data selection using a reference model 40x smaller than the target model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T07:45:33Z)
• How to Train Data-Efficient LLMs [56.41105687693619]
  We study data-efficient approaches for pre-training language models (LLMs) We find that Ask-LLM and Density sampling are the best methods in their respective categories. In our comparison of 19 samplers, involving hundreds of evaluation tasks and pre-training runs, we find that Ask-LLM and Density are the best methods in their respective categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T02:27:57Z)
• Scaling Data Generation in Vision-and-Language Navigation [116.95534559103788]
  We propose an effective paradigm for generating large-scale data for learning. We apply 1200+ photo-realistic environments from HM3D and Gibson datasets and synthesizes 4.9 million instruction trajectory pairs. Thanks to our large-scale dataset, the performance of an existing agent can be pushed up (+11% absolute with regard to previous SoTA) to a significantly new best of 80% single-run success rate on the R2R test split by simple imitation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-28T16:03:28Z)
• A Meta-Learning Approach to Predicting Performance and Data Requirements [163.4412093478316]
  We propose an approach to estimate the number of samples required for a model to reach a target performance. We find that the power law, the de facto principle to estimate model performance, leads to large error when using a small dataset. We introduce a novel piecewise power law (PPL) that handles the two data differently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T21:48:22Z)
• Are Sample-Efficient NLP Models More Robust? [90.54786862811183]
  We investigate the relationship between sample efficiency (amount of data needed to reach a given ID accuracy) and robustness (how models fare on OOD evaluation) We find that higher sample efficiency is only correlated with better average OOD robustness on some modeling interventions and tasks, but not others. These results suggest that general-purpose methods for improving sample efficiency are unlikely to yield universal OOD robustness improvements, since such improvements are highly dataset- and task-dependent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-12T17:54:59Z)
• Complementary Ensemble Learning [1.90365714903665]
  We derive a technique to improve performance of state-of-the-art deep learning models. Specifically, we train auxiliary models which are able to complement state-of-the-art model uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-09T03:23:05Z)
• Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamics [118.75207687144817]
  We introduce Data Maps, a model-based tool to characterize and diagnose datasets. We leverage a largely ignored source of information: the behavior of the model on individual instances during training. Our results indicate that a shift in focus from quantity to quality of data could lead to robust models and improved out-of-distribution generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-22T20:19:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.