Proof-of-Federated-Learning-Subchain: Free Partner Selection Subchain
Based on Federated Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16342v1
- Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2023 23:39:58 GMT
- Title: Proof-of-Federated-Learning-Subchain: Free Partner Selection Subchain
Based on Federated Learning
- Authors: Boyang Li, Bingyu Shen, Qing Lu, Taeho Jung, Yiyu Shi
- Abstract summary: We proposed a novel consensus named Proof-of-Federated-Learning-Subchain(PoFLSC) to fill the gap.
We simulated 20 miners in the subchain to demonstrate the effectiveness of PoFLSC.
- Score: 14.16827294216978
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The continuous thriving of the Blockchain society motivates research in novel
designs of schemes supporting cryptocurrencies. Previously multiple
Proof-of-Deep-Learning(PoDL) consensuses have been proposed to replace hashing
with useful work such as deep learning model training tasks. The energy will be
more efficiently used while maintaining the ledger. However deep learning
models are problem-specific and can be extremely complex. Current PoDL
consensuses still require much work to realize in the real world. In this
paper, we proposed a novel consensus named
Proof-of-Federated-Learning-Subchain(PoFLSC) to fill the gap. We applied a
subchain to record the training, challenging, and auditing activities and
emphasized the importance of valuable datasets in partner selection. We
simulated 20 miners in the subchain to demonstrate the effectiveness of PoFLSC.
When we reduce the pool size concerning the reservation priority order, the
drop rate difference in the performance in different scenarios further exhibits
that the miner with a higher Shapley Value (SV) will gain a better opportunity
to be selected when the size of the subchain pool is limited. In the conducted
experiments, the PoFLSC consensus supported the subchain manager to be aware of
reservation priority and the core partition of contributors to establish and
maintain a competitive subchain.
Related papers
- Should my Blockchain Learn to Drive? A Study of Hyperledger Fabric [14.834625066344586]
This paper explores the concept of self-driving blockchains, which have the potential to predict workload changes and reconfigure themselves for optimal performance without human intervention.
We identify specific parameters and components in Hyperledger Fabric, a popular permissioned blockchain system, that are suitable for autonomous adaptation and offer potential solutions for the challenges involved.
Our experiments indicate up to 11% improvement in success throughput and a 30% decrease in latency, making this a significant step towards implementing a fully autonomous blockchain system in the future.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-10T14:33:59Z) - Enhancing Trust and Privacy in Distributed Networks: A Comprehensive Survey on Blockchain-based Federated Learning [51.13534069758711]
Decentralized approaches like blockchain offer a compelling solution by implementing a consensus mechanism among multiple entities.
Federated Learning (FL) enables participants to collaboratively train models while safeguarding data privacy.
This paper investigates the synergy between blockchain's security features and FL's privacy-preserving model training capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-28T07:08:26Z) - Dense Reward for Free in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [64.92448888346125]
We leverage the fact that the reward model contains more information than just its scalar output.
We use these attention weights to redistribute the reward along the whole completion.
Empirically, we show that it stabilises training, accelerates the rate of learning, and, in practical cases, may lead to better local optima.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-01T17:10:35Z) - Generative AI-enabled Blockchain Networks: Fundamentals, Applications,
and Case Study [73.87110604150315]
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has emerged as a promising solution to address challenges of blockchain technology.
In this paper, we first introduce GAI techniques, outline their applications, and discuss existing solutions for integrating GAI into blockchains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-28T10:46:17Z) - Proof of Deep Learning: Approaches, Challenges, and Future Directions [0.0]
PoDL is a consensus mechanism that uses the process of training a deep learning model as proof of work to add new blocks to the blockchain.
We discuss the different types of PoDL algorithms, their advantages and disadvantages, and their potential applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-31T13:49:04Z) - FedChain: An Efficient and Secure Consensus Protocol based on Proof of Useful Federated Learning for Blockchain [0.3480973072524161]
The core of the blockchain is the consensus protocol, which establishes consensus among all the participants.
We propose an efficient and secure consensus protocol based on proof of useful federated learning for blockchain (called FedChain)
Our approach has been tested and validated through extensive experiments, demonstrating its performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-29T08:04:07Z) - Secure and Efficient Federated Learning Through Layering and Sharding
Blockchain [15.197940168865271]
This paper proposes ChainFL, a novel two-layer blockchain-driven Federated Learning system.
It splits the Internet network into multiple shards within the subchain layer, effectively reducing the scale of information exchange.
It also employs a Direct Acyclic Graph (DAG)-based mainchain as the mainchain layer, enabling parallel and asynchronous cross-shard validation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-27T12:19:07Z) - Blockchain Assisted Decentralized Federated Learning (BLADE-FL):
Performance Analysis and Resource Allocation [119.19061102064497]
We propose a decentralized FL framework by integrating blockchain into FL, namely, blockchain assisted decentralized federated learning (BLADE-FL)
In a round of the proposed BLADE-FL, each client broadcasts its trained model to other clients, competes to generate a block based on the received models, and then aggregates the models from the generated block before its local training of the next round.
We explore the impact of lazy clients on the learning performance of BLADE-FL, and characterize the relationship among the optimal K, the learning parameters, and the proportion of lazy clients.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-18T07:19:08Z) - Blockchain Assisted Decentralized Federated Learning (BLADE-FL) with
Lazy Clients [124.48732110742623]
We propose a novel framework by integrating blockchain into Federated Learning (FL)
BLADE-FL has a good performance in terms of privacy preservation, tamper resistance, and effective cooperation of learning.
It gives rise to a new problem of training deficiency, caused by lazy clients who plagiarize others' trained models and add artificial noises to conceal their cheating behaviors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-02T12:18:27Z) - Proof of Learning (PoLe): Empowering Machine Learning with Consensus
Building on Blockchains [7.854034211489588]
We propose a new consensus mechanism, Proof of Learning (PoLe), which directs the spent for consensus toward optimization of neural networks (NN)
In our mechanism, the training/testing data are released to the entire blockchain network (BCN) and the consensus nodes train NN models on the data.
We show that PoLe can achieve a more stable block generation rate, which leads to more efficient transaction processing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-29T22:53:43Z) - Resource Management for Blockchain-enabled Federated Learning: A Deep
Reinforcement Learning Approach [54.29213445674221]
Federated Learning (BFL) enables mobile devices to collaboratively train neural network models required by a Machine Learning Model Owner (MLMO)
The issue of BFL is that the mobile devices have energy and CPU constraints that may reduce the system lifetime and training efficiency.
We propose to use the Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) to derive the optimal decisions for theO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-08T16:29:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.