MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.00352v7
• Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2024 14:36:52 GMT
• Title: MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework
• Authors: Sirui Hong, Mingchen Zhuge, Jiaqi Chen, Xiawu Zheng, Yuheng Cheng, Ceyao Zhang, Jinlin Wang, Zili Wang, Steven Ka Shing Yau, Zijuan Lin, Liyang Zhou, Chenyu Ran, Lingfeng Xiao, Chenglin Wu, Jürgen Schmidhuber,
• Abstract summary: We introduce MetaGPT, an innovative metaprogramming framework incorporating efficient human into multi-agent collaborations. MetaGPT encodes Standardized Operating Procedures (SOPs) into prompt sequences for more streamlined verification. On collaborative software engineering benchmarks, MetaGPT generates more coherent solutions than previous chat-based multi-agent systems.
• Score: 32.95727162682409
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Remarkable progress has been made on automated problem solving through societies of agents based on large language models (LLMs). Existing LLM-based multi-agent systems can already solve simple dialogue tasks. Solutions to more complex tasks, however, are complicated through logic inconsistencies due to cascading hallucinations caused by naively chaining LLMs. Here we introduce MetaGPT, an innovative meta-programming framework incorporating efficient human workflows into LLM-based multi-agent collaborations. MetaGPT encodes Standardized Operating Procedures (SOPs) into prompt sequences for more streamlined workflows, thus allowing agents with human-like domain expertise to verify intermediate results and reduce errors. MetaGPT utilizes an assembly line paradigm to assign diverse roles to various agents, efficiently breaking down complex tasks into subtasks involving many agents working together. On collaborative software engineering benchmarks, MetaGPT generates more coherent solutions than previous chat-based multi-agent systems. Our project can be found at https://github.com/geekan/MetaGPT

Related papers

• API Agents vs. GUI Agents: Divergence and Convergence [35.28490346033735]
  API- and GUI-based large language models (LLMs) interact with graphical user interfaces in a human-like manner. This paper systematically analyzes their divergence and potential convergence. We indicate that continuing innovations in LLM-based automation are poised to blur the lines between API- and GUI-driven agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T04:26:21Z)
• Enhancing Multi-Agent Systems via Reinforcement Learning with LLM-based Planner and Graph-based Policy [31.041340552853004]
  Graph Collaboration MARL (LGC-MARL) is a framework that efficiently combines Large Language Models (LLMs) and Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) LGC-MARL decomposes complex tasks into executable subtasks and achieves efficient collaboration among multiple agents through graph-based coordination. Experimental results on the AI2-THOR simulation platform demonstrate the superior performance and scalability of LGC-MARL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T05:02:49Z)
• MultiAgentBench: Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents [59.825725526176655]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities as autonomous agents. Existing benchmarks either focus on single-agent tasks or are confined to narrow domains, failing to capture the dynamics of multi-agent coordination and competition. We introduce MultiAgentBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate LLM-based multi-agent systems across diverse, interactive scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T05:18:50Z)
• Talk Structurally, Act Hierarchically: A Collaborative Framework for LLM Multi-Agent Systems [10.67359331022116]
  textitTalk Structurally, Act Hierarchically (TalkHier) is a novel framework that introduces a structured communication protocol for context-rich exchanges. textitTalkHier surpasses various types of SoTA, including inference scaling model (OpenAI-o1), open-source multi-agent models (e.g., AgentVerse)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T12:26:58Z)
• MALT: Improving Reasoning with Multi-Agent LLM Training [66.9481561915524]
  MALT (Multi-Agent LLM Training) is a novel post-training strategy that divides the reasoning process into generation, verification, and refinement steps. On MATH, GSM8K, and CSQA, MALT surpasses the same baseline LLM with a relative improvement of 15.66%, 7.42%, and 9.40% respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T19:30:36Z)
• MaCTG: Multi-Agent Collaborative Thought Graph for Automatic Programming [10.461509044478278]
  MaCTG (MultiAgent Collaborative Thought Graph) is a novel multi-agent framework that employs a dynamic graph structure. It autonomously assigns agent roles based on programming requirements, dynamically refines task distribution, and systematically verifies and integrates project-level code. MaCTG significantly reduced operational costs by 89.09% compared to existing multi-agent frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T01:52:15Z)
• AutoML-Agent: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Full-Pipeline AutoML [56.565200973244146]
  Automated machine learning (AutoML) accelerates AI development by automating tasks in the development pipeline. Recent works have started exploiting large language models (LLM) to lessen such burden. This paper proposes AutoML-Agent, a novel multi-agent framework tailored for full-pipeline AutoML.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T20:01:09Z)
• Agent-Oriented Planning in Multi-Agent Systems [54.429028104022066]
  We propose AOP, a novel framework for agent-oriented planning in multi-agent systems. In this study, we identify three critical design principles of agent-oriented planning, including solvability, completeness, and non-redundancy. Extensive experiments demonstrate the advancement of AOP in solving real-world problems compared to both single-agent systems and existing planning strategies for multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T04:07:51Z)
• Optimizing Collaboration of LLM based Agents for Finite Element Analysis [1.5039745292757671]
  This paper investigates the interactions between multiple agents within Large Language Models (LLMs) in the context of programming and coding tasks. We utilize the AutoGen framework to facilitate communication among agents, evaluating different configurations based on the success rates from 40 random runs for each setup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T23:11:08Z)
• EvoAgent: Towards Automatic Multi-Agent Generation via Evolutionary Algorithms [55.77492625524141]
  EvoAgent is a generic method to automatically extend specialized agents to multi-agent systems. We show that EvoAgent can significantly enhance the task-solving capability of LLM-based agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T11:49:23Z)
• Meta-Task Planning for Language Agents [13.550774629515843]
  Large language model-based agents (LLM agents) have emerged as a promising paradigm for achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI) This paper introduces Meta-Task Planning (MTP), a zero-shot methodology for collaborative LLM-based multi-agent systems. MTP achieved an average $sim40%$ success rate on TravelPlanner, significantly higher than the state-of-the-art (SOTA) baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T10:33:17Z)
• Language Agents as Optimizable Graphs [31.220547147952278]
  We describe Large Language Models (LLMs)-based agents as computational graphs. Our framework can be used to efficiently develop, integrate, and automatically improve various LLM agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T18:48:27Z)
• Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agents [76.95566120678787]
  This work proposes to use Python code to consolidate Large Language Model (LLM) agents' actions into a unified action space (CodeAct) integrated with a Python interpreter, CodeAct can execute code actions and dynamically revise prior actions or emit new actions upon new observations through multi-turn interactions. The encouraging performance of CodeAct motivates us to build an open-source LLM agent that interacts with environments by executing interpretable code and collaborates with users using natural language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T21:38:58Z)
• TaskBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Task Automation [82.2932794189585]
  We introduce TaskBench, a framework to evaluate the capability of large language models (LLMs) in task automation. Specifically, task decomposition, tool selection, and parameter prediction are assessed. Our approach combines automated construction with rigorous human verification, ensuring high consistency with human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T18:02:44Z)
• MAgIC: Investigation of Large Language Model Powered Multi-Agent in Cognition, Adaptability, Rationality and Collaboration [102.41118020705876]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have marked a significant advancement in the field of natural language processing. As their applications extend into multi-agent environments, a need has arisen for a comprehensive evaluation framework. This work introduces a novel benchmarking framework specifically tailored to assess LLMs within multi-agent settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T21:46:27Z)
• Multi-Agent Consensus Seeking via Large Language Models [6.922356864800498]
  Multi-agent systems driven by large language models (LLMs) have shown promising abilities for solving complex tasks in a collaborative manner. This work considers a fundamental problem in multi-agent collaboration: consensus seeking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T03:37:11Z)
• A Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network for Task-Oriented Agent Collaboration [55.35849138235116]
  We propose automatically selecting a team of agents from candidates to collaborate in a dynamic communication structure toward different tasks and domains. Specifically, we build a framework named Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network ($textDyLAN$) for LLM-powered agent collaboration. We demonstrate that DyLAN outperforms strong baselines in code generation, decision-making, general reasoning, and arithmetic reasoning tasks with moderate computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T16:05:48Z)
• AutoAgents: A Framework for Automatic Agent Generation [27.74332323317923]
  AutoAgents is an innovative framework that adaptively generates and coordinates multiple specialized agents to build an AI team according to different tasks. Our experiments on various benchmarks demonstrate that AutoAgents generates more coherent and accurate solutions than the existing multi-agent methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T14:46:30Z)
• Recommender AI Agent: Integrating Large Language Models for Interactive Recommendations [53.76682562935373]
  We introduce an efficient framework called textbfInteRecAgent, which employs LLMs as the brain and recommender models as tools. InteRecAgent achieves satisfying performance as a conversational recommender system, outperforming general-purpose LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T07:36:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.