Multi-Agent Consensus Seeking via Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.20151v1
• Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 03:37:11 GMT
• Title: Multi-Agent Consensus Seeking via Large Language Models
• Authors: Huaben Chen, Wenkang Ji, Lufeng Xu, Shiyu Zhao
• Abstract summary: Multi-agent systems driven by large language models (LLMs) have shown promising abilities for solving complex tasks in a collaborative manner. This work considers a fundamental problem in multi-agent collaboration: consensus seeking.
• Score: 6.922356864800498
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multi-agent systems driven by large language models (LLMs) have shown promising abilities for solving complex tasks in a collaborative manner. This work considers a fundamental problem in multi-agent collaboration: consensus seeking. When multiple agents work together, we are interested in how they can reach a consensus through inter-agent negotiation. To that end, this work studies a consensus-seeking task where the state of each agent is a numerical value and they negotiate with each other to reach a consensus value. It is revealed that when not explicitly directed on which strategy should be adopted, the LLM-driven agents primarily use the average strategy for consensus seeking although they may occasionally use some other strategies. Moreover, this work analyzes the impact of the agent number, agent personality, and network topology on the negotiation process. The findings reported in this work can potentially lay the foundations for understanding the behaviors of LLM-driven multi-agent systems for solving more complex tasks. Furthermore, LLM-driven consensus seeking is applied to a multi-robot aggregation task. This application demonstrates the potential of LLM-driven agents to achieve zero-shot autonomous planning for multi-robot collaboration tasks. Project website: westlakeintelligentrobotics.github.io/ConsensusLLM/.

Related papers

• COMMA: A Communicative Multimodal Multi-Agent Benchmark [7.831385481814481]
  We introduce a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the collaborative performance of multimodal multi-agent systems through language communication. By testing both agent-agent and agent-human collaborations using open-source and closed-source models, our findings reveal surprising weaknesses in state-of-the-art models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T02:49:47Z)
• Reaching Consensus in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Goal Imagination [16.74629849552254]
  We propose a model-based consensus mechanism to explicitly coordinate multiple agents. The proposed Multi-agent Goal Imagination (MAGI) framework guides agents to reach consensus with an Imagined common goal. We show that such efficient consensus mechanism can guide all agents cooperatively reaching valuable future states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T18:07:34Z)
• Large Multimodal Agents: A Survey [78.81459893884737]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved superior performance in powering text-based AI agents. There is an emerging research trend focused on extending these LLM-powered AI agents into the multimodal domain. This review aims to provide valuable insights and guidelines for future research in this rapidly evolving field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T06:04:23Z)
• Large Language Model-based Human-Agent Collaboration for Complex Task Solving [94.3914058341565]
  We introduce the problem of Large Language Models (LLMs)-based human-agent collaboration for complex task-solving. We propose a Reinforcement Learning-based Human-Agent Collaboration method, ReHAC. This approach includes a policy model designed to determine the most opportune stages for human intervention within the task-solving process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T11:03:36Z)
• AutoAgents: A Framework for Automatic Agent Generation [27.74332323317923]
  AutoAgents is an innovative framework that adaptively generates and coordinates multiple specialized agents to build an AI team according to different tasks. Our experiments on various benchmarks demonstrate that AutoAgents generates more coherent and accurate solutions than the existing multi-agent methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T14:46:30Z)
• Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation [52.930183136111864]
  We propose using scorable negotiation to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) To reach an agreement, agents must have strong arithmetic, inference, exploration, and planning capabilities. We provide procedures to create new games and increase games' difficulty to have an evolving benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T13:33:06Z)
• AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviors [93.38830440346783]
  We propose a multi-agent framework framework that can collaboratively adjust its composition as a greater-than-the-sum-of-its-parts system. Our experiments demonstrate that framework framework can effectively deploy multi-agent groups that outperform a single agent. In view of these behaviors, we discuss some possible strategies to leverage positive ones and mitigate negative ones for improving the collaborative potential of multi-agent groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T16:47:11Z)
• Heterogeneous Embodied Multi-Agent Collaboration [21.364827833498254]
  Heterogeneous multi-agent tasks are common in real-world scenarios. We propose the heterogeneous multi-agent tidying-up task, in which multiple heterogeneous agents collaborate to detect misplaced objects and place them in reasonable locations. We propose the hierarchical decision model based on misplaced object detection, reasonable receptacle prediction, as well as the handshake-based group communication mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-26T04:33:05Z)
• Learning Reward Machines in Cooperative Multi-Agent Tasks [75.79805204646428]
  This paper presents a novel approach to Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) It combines cooperative task decomposition with the learning of reward machines (RMs) encoding the structure of the sub-tasks. The proposed method helps deal with the non-Markovian nature of the rewards in partially observable environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T15:12:28Z)
• Multi-agent Deep Covering Skill Discovery [50.812414209206054]
  We propose Multi-agent Deep Covering Option Discovery, which constructs the multi-agent options through minimizing the expected cover time of the multiple agents' joint state space. Also, we propose a novel framework to adopt the multi-agent options in the MARL process. We show that the proposed algorithm can effectively capture the agent interactions with the attention mechanism, successfully identify multi-agent options, and significantly outperforms prior works using single-agent options or no options.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-07T00:40:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.