Exploring the Role of Explainability in AI-Assisted Embryo Selection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.02534v1
• Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 09:46:31 GMT
• Title: Exploring the Role of Explainability in AI-Assisted Embryo Selection
• Authors: Lucia Urcelay, Daniel Hinjos, Pablo A. Martin-Torres, Marta Gonzalez, Marta Mendez, Salva C\'ivico, Sergio \'Alvarez-Napagao and Dario Garcia-Gasulla
• Abstract summary: In Vitro Fertilization is among the most widespread treatments for infertility. One of its main challenges is the evaluation and selection of embryo for implantation. Deep learning based methods are gaining attention, but their opaque nature compromises their acceptance in the clinical context.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In Vitro Fertilization is among the most widespread treatments for infertility. One of its main challenges is the evaluation and selection of embryo for implantation, a process with large inter- and intra-clinician variability. Deep learning based methods are gaining attention, but their opaque nature compromises their acceptance in the clinical context, where transparency in the decision making is key. In this paper we analyze the current work in the explainability of AI-assisted embryo analysis models, identifying the limitations. We also discuss how these models could be integrated in the clinical context as decision support systems, considering the needs of clinicians and patients. Finally, we propose guidelines for the sake of increasing interpretability and trustworthiness, pushing this technology forward towards established clinical practice.

Related papers

• Beyond One-Time Validation: A Framework for Adaptive Validation of Prognostic and Diagnostic AI-based Medical Devices [55.319842359034546]
  Existing approaches often fall short in addressing the complexity of practically deploying these devices. The presented framework emphasizes the importance of repeating validation and fine-tuning during deployment. It is positioned within the current US and EU regulatory landscapes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-07T11:13:52Z)
• XAI for In-hospital Mortality Prediction via Multimodal ICU Data [57.73357047856416]
  We propose an efficient, explainable AI solution for predicting in-hospital mortality via multimodal ICU data. We employ multimodal learning in our framework, which can receive heterogeneous inputs from clinical data and make decisions. Our framework can be easily transferred to other clinical tasks, which facilitates the discovery of crucial factors in healthcare research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-29T14:28:04Z)
• Elucidating Discrepancy in Explanations of Predictive Models Developed using EMR [2.1561701531034414]
  Lack of transparency and explainability hinders the clinical adoption of Machine learning (ML) algorithms. This study applies current state-of-the-art explainability methods to clinical decision support algorithms developed for Electronic Medical Records (EMR) data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T10:13:31Z)
• Explainable AI for clinical risk prediction: a survey of concepts, methods, and modalities [2.9404725327650767]
  Review of progress in developing explainable models for clinical risk prediction. emphasizes the need for external validation and the combination of diverse interpretability methods. End-to-end approach to explainability in clinical risk prediction is essential for success.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-16T14:51:51Z)
• Validating polyp and instrument segmentation methods in colonoscopy through Medico 2020 and MedAI 2021 Challenges [58.32937972322058]
  "Medico automatic polyp segmentation (Medico 2020)" and "MedAI: Transparency in Medical Image (MedAI 2021)" competitions. We present a comprehensive summary and analyze each contribution, highlight the strength of the best-performing methods, and discuss the possibility of clinical translations of such methods into the clinic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-30T16:08:45Z)
• Evaluation of Popular XAI Applied to Clinical Prediction Models: Can They be Trusted? [2.0089256058364358]
  The absence of transparency and explainability hinders the clinical adoption of Machine learning (ML) algorithms. This study evaluates two popular XAI methods used for explaining predictive models in the healthcare context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T02:29:30Z)
• COVID-Net Biochem: An Explainability-driven Framework to Building Machine Learning Models for Predicting Survival and Kidney Injury of COVID-19 Patients from Clinical and Biochemistry Data [66.43957431843324]
  We introduce COVID-Net Biochem, a versatile and explainable framework for constructing machine learning models. We apply this framework to predict COVID-19 patient survival and the likelihood of developing Acute Kidney Injury during hospitalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-24T07:38:37Z)
• Explainable Deep Learning in Healthcare: A Methodological Survey from an Attribution View [36.025217954247125]
  We introduce the methods for interpretability in depth and comprehensively as a methodological reference for future researchers or clinical practitioners. We discuss how these methods have been adapted and applied to healthcare problems and how they can help physicians better understand these data-driven technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-05T17:12:53Z)
• Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
  Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks. Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets. We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z)
• Achievements and Challenges in Explaining Deep Learning based Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systems [4.9449660544238085]
  We discuss early achievements in development of explainable AI for validation of known disease criteria. We highlight some of the remaining challenges that stand in the way of practical applications of AI as a clinical decision support tool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-26T08:08:19Z)
• Explaining Clinical Decision Support Systems in Medical Imaging using Cycle-Consistent Activation Maximization [112.2628296775395]
  Clinical decision support using deep neural networks has become a topic of steadily growing interest. clinicians are often hesitant to adopt the technology because its underlying decision-making process is considered to be intransparent and difficult to comprehend. We propose a novel decision explanation scheme based on CycleGAN activation which generates high-quality visualizations of classifier decisions even in smaller data sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-09T14:39:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.