RLHF-Blender: A Configurable Interactive Interface for Learning from
Diverse Human Feedback
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.04332v1
- Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 15:21:30 GMT
- Title: RLHF-Blender: A Configurable Interactive Interface for Learning from
Diverse Human Feedback
- Authors: Yannick Metz, David Lindner, Rapha\"el Baur, Daniel Keim, Mennatallah
El-Assady
- Abstract summary: We propose RLHF-Blender, an interactive interface for learning from human feedback.
RLHF-Blender provides a modular experimentation framework that enables researchers to investigate the properties and qualities of human feedback.
We discuss a set of concrete research opportunities enabled by RLHF-Blender.
- Score: 9.407901608317895
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: To use reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) in practical
applications, it is crucial to learn reward models from diverse sources of
human feedback and to consider human factors involved in providing feedback of
different types. However, the systematic study of learning from diverse types
of feedback is held back by limited standardized tooling available to
researchers. To bridge this gap, we propose RLHF-Blender, a configurable,
interactive interface for learning from human feedback. RLHF-Blender provides a
modular experimentation framework and implementation that enables researchers
to systematically investigate the properties and qualities of human feedback
for reward learning. The system facilitates the exploration of various feedback
types, including demonstrations, rankings, comparisons, and natural language
instructions, as well as studies considering the impact of human factors on
their effectiveness. We discuss a set of concrete research opportunities
enabled by RLHF-Blender. More information is available at
https://rlhfblender.info/.
Related papers
- RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs [49.386699863989335]
Training large language models (LLMs) to serve as effective assistants for humans requires careful consideration.
A promising approach is reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), which leverages human feedback to update the model in accordance with human preferences.
In this paper, we analyze RLHF through the lens of reinforcement learning principles to develop an understanding of its fundamentals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-12T15:54:15Z) - Provable Multi-Party Reinforcement Learning with Diverse Human Feedback [63.830731470186855]
Reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) is an emerging paradigm to align models with human preferences.
We show how traditional RLHF approaches can fail since learning a single reward function cannot capture and balance the preferences of multiple individuals.
We incorporate meta-learning to learn multiple preferences and adopt different social welfare functions to aggregate the preferences across multiple parties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-08T03:05:11Z) - Uni-RLHF: Universal Platform and Benchmark Suite for Reinforcement Learning with Diverse Human Feedback [43.51441849047147]
We introduce Uni-RLHF, a comprehensive system implementation tailored for RLHF.
Uni-RLHF contains three packages: 1) a universal multi-feedback annotation platform, 2) large-scale crowdsourced feedback datasets, and 3) modular offline RLHF baseline implementations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-04T09:40:22Z) - A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [28.92654784501927]
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a variant of reinforcement learning (RL) that learns from human feedback instead of relying on an engineered reward function.
This article provides a comprehensive overview of the fundamentals of RLHF, exploring the intricate dynamics between RL agents and human input.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-22T18:58:06Z) - Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback via Active
Exploration [29.935758027209292]
Preference-based feedback is important for many applications in reinforcement learning.
In this work, we take advantage of the fact that one can often choose contexts to obtain human feedback.
We show that our method is able to reach better performance with fewer samples of human preferences than multiple baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-01T00:54:02Z) - The History and Risks of Reinforcement Learning and Human Feedback [0.16843915833103415]
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a powerful technique to make large language models easier to use and more effective.
A core piece of the RLHF process is the training and utilization of a model of human preferences that acts as a reward function for optimization.
RLHF reward models are often cited as being central to achieving performance, yet very few descriptors of capabilities, evaluations, training methods, or open-source models exist.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T15:45:16Z) - UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback [99.4633351133207]
We present textscUltraFeedback, a large-scale, high-quality, and diversified AI feedback dataset.
Our work validates the effectiveness of scaled AI feedback data in constructing strong open-source chat language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-02T17:40:01Z) - SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedback [35.74135968442311]
We show how the recently introduced Sequence Likelihood (SLiC) can also be used to effectively learn from human preferences.
Experiments on the TL;DR summarization task show that SLiC-HF significantly improves supervised fine-tuning baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-17T17:57:10Z) - RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback
without tears [69.68672043223249]
InstructGPT implements RLHF through several stages, including Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), reward model training, and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)
We propose a novel learning paradigm called RRHF, which scores sampled responses from different sources via a logarithm of conditional probabilities.
We evaluate RRHF on the Helpful and Harmless dataset, demonstrating comparable alignment performance with PPO by reward model score and human labeling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-11T15:53:40Z) - Accelerating exploration and representation learning with offline
pre-training [52.6912479800592]
We show that exploration and representation learning can be improved by separately learning two different models from a single offline dataset.
We show that learning a state representation using noise-contrastive estimation and a model of auxiliary reward can significantly improve the sample efficiency on the challenging NetHack benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-31T18:03:30Z) - PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via
Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training [94.87393610927812]
We present an off-policy, interactive reinforcement learning algorithm that capitalizes on the strengths of both feedback and off-policy learning.
We demonstrate that our approach is capable of learning tasks of higher complexity than previously considered by human-in-the-loop methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-09T14:10:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.