Machine Learning-Enabled Software and System Architecture Frameworks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.05239v2
• Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 22:09:04 GMT
• Title: Machine Learning-Enabled Software and System Architecture Frameworks
• Authors: Armin Moin, Atta Badii, Stephan Günnemann, Moharram Challenger,
• Abstract summary: The stakeholders with data science and Machine Learning related concerns, such as data scientists and data engineers, are yet to be included in existing architecture frameworks. We surveyed 61 subject matter experts from over 25 organizations in 10 countries.
• Score: 48.87872564630711
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Various architecture frameworks for software, systems, and enterprises have been proposed in the literature. They identified several stakeholders and defined modeling perspectives, architecture viewpoints, and views to frame and address stakeholder concerns. However, the stakeholders with data science and Machine Learning (ML) related concerns, such as data scientists and data engineers, are yet to be included in existing architecture frameworks. Only this way can we envision a holistic system architecture description of an ML-enabled system. Note that the ML component behavior and functionalities are special and should be distinguished from traditional software system behavior and functionalities. The main reason is that the actual functionality should be inferred from data instead of being specified at design time. Additionally, the structural models of ML components, such as ML model architectures, are typically specified using different notations and formalisms from what the Software Engineering (SE) community uses for software structural models. Yet, these two aspects, namely ML and non-ML, are becoming so intertwined that it necessitates an extension of software architecture frameworks and modeling practices toward supporting ML-enabled system architectures. In this paper, we address this gap through an empirical study using an online survey instrument. We surveyed 61 subject matter experts from over 25 organizations in 10 countries.

Related papers

• A Large-Scale Study of Model Integration in ML-Enabled Software Systems [4.776073133338119]
  Machine learning (ML) and its embedding in systems has drastically changed the engineering of software-intensive systems. Traditionally, software engineering focuses on manually created artifacts such as source code and the process of creating them. We present the first large-scale study of real ML-enabled software systems, covering over 2,928 open source systems on GitHub.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-12T15:28:40Z)
• Serving Deep Learning Model in Relational Databases [70.53282490832189]
  Serving deep learning (DL) models on relational data has become a critical requirement across diverse commercial and scientific domains. We highlight three pivotal paradigms: The state-of-the-art DL-centric architecture offloads DL computations to dedicated DL frameworks. The potential UDF-centric architecture encapsulates one or more tensor computations into User Defined Functions (UDFs) within the relational database management system (RDBMS)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-07T06:01:35Z)
• CodeTF: One-stop Transformer Library for State-of-the-art Code LLM [72.1638273937025]
  We present CodeTF, an open-source Transformer-based library for state-of-the-art Code LLMs and code intelligence. Our library supports a collection of pretrained Code LLM models and popular code benchmarks. We hope CodeTF is able to bridge the gap between machine learning/generative AI and software engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T05:24:48Z)
• A Compositional Approach to Creating Architecture Frameworks with an Application to Distributed AI Systems [16.690434072032176]
  We show how compositional thinking can provide rules for the creation and management of architectural frameworks for complex systems. The aim of the paper is not to provide viewpoints or architecture models specific to AI systems, but instead to provide guidelines on how a consistent framework can be built up with existing, or newly created, viewpoints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-27T18:05:02Z)
• MDE for Machine Learning-Enabled Software Systems: A Case Study and Comparison of MontiAnna & ML-Quadrat [5.839906946900443]
  We propose to adopt the MDE paradigm for the development of Machine Learning-enabled software systems with a focus on the Internet of Things (IoT) domain. We illustrate how two state-of-the-art open-source modeling tools, namely MontiAnna and ML-Quadrat can be used for this purpose as demonstrated through a case study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-15T13:21:16Z)
• Symmetry Group Equivariant Architectures for Physics [52.784926970374556]
  In the domain of machine learning, an awareness of symmetries has driven impressive performance breakthroughs. We argue that both the physics community and the broader machine learning community have much to understand.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-11T18:27:04Z)
• Software Architecture for ML-based Systems: What Exists and What Lies Ahead [4.073826298938432]
  We focus on the former side of the spectrum with a goal to highlight the different architecting practices that exist in the current scenario for architecting ML-based software systems. We identify four key areas of software architecture that need the attention of both the ML and software practitioners to better define a standard set of practices for architecting ML-based software systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-14T15:20:46Z)
• A Survey of Machine Learning for Computer Architecture and Systems [18.620218353713476]
  It has been a long time that computer architecture and systems are optimized to enable efficient execution of machine learning (ML) algorithms or models. Now, it is time to reconsider the relationship between ML and systems, and let ML transform the way that computer architecture and systems are designed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-16T04:09:57Z)
• Technology Readiness Levels for Machine Learning Systems [107.56979560568232]
  Development and deployment of machine learning systems can be executed easily with modern tools, but the process is typically rushed and means-to-an-end. We have developed a proven systems engineering approach for machine learning development and deployment. Our "Machine Learning Technology Readiness Levels" framework defines a principled process to ensure robust, reliable, and responsible systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-11T15:54:48Z)
• Technology Readiness Levels for AI & ML [79.22051549519989]
  Development of machine learning systems can be executed easily with modern tools, but the process is typically rushed and means-to-an-end. Engineering systems follow well-defined processes and testing standards to streamline development for high-quality, reliable results. We propose a proven systems engineering approach for machine learning development and deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-21T17:14:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.