Decentralised Governance-Driven Architecture for Designing Foundation Model based Systems: Exploring the Role of Blockchain in Responsible AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.05962v3
• Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 23:17:41 GMT
• Title: Decentralised Governance-Driven Architecture for Designing Foundation Model based Systems: Exploring the Role of Blockchain in Responsible AI
• Authors: Yue Liu, Qinghua Lu, Liming Zhu, Hye-Young Paik
• Abstract summary: People are concerned about whether foundation model based AI systems are properly governed to ensure the trustworthiness and to prevent misuse that could harm humans, society and the environment. We identify eight governance challenges of foundation model based AI systems regarding the three fundamental dimensions of governance: decision rights, incentives, and accountability. We present an architecture that demonstrates how blockchain can be leveraged to realise governance in foundation model based AI systems.
• Score: 20.47157829480463
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Foundation models including large language models (LLMs) are increasingly attracting interest worldwide for their distinguished capabilities and potential to perform a wide variety of tasks. Nevertheless, people are concerned about whether foundation model based AI systems are properly governed to ensure the trustworthiness and to prevent misuse that could harm humans, society and the environment. In this paper, we identify eight governance challenges of foundation model based AI systems regarding the three fundamental dimensions of governance: decision rights, incentives, and accountability. Furthermore, we explore the potential of blockchain as an architectural solution to address the challenges by providing a distributed ledger to facilitate decentralised governance. We present an architecture that demonstrates how blockchain can be leveraged to realise governance in foundation model based AI systems.

Related papers

• SoK: Decentralized AI (DeAI) [4.651101982820699]
  We present a Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) for blockchain-based DeAI solutions. We propose a taxonomy to classify existing DeAI protocols based on the model lifecycle. We investigate how blockchain features contribute to enhancing the security, transparency, and trustworthiness of AI processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T14:28:25Z)
• Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
  This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence. As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z)
• DAOs of Collective Intelligence? Unraveling the Complexity of Blockchain Governance in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations [0.7499722271664144]
  Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) have transformed organizational structures by shifting from traditional control to decentralized control. Despite managing significant funds and building global networks, DAOs face challenges like declining participation, increasing centralization, and inabilities to adapt to changing environments. This paper explores complex systems and applies complexity science to explain their inefficiencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T12:06:15Z)
• Enhancing Trust and Privacy in Distributed Networks: A Comprehensive Survey on Blockchain-based Federated Learning [51.13534069758711]
  Decentralized approaches like blockchain offer a compelling solution by implementing a consensus mechanism among multiple entities. Federated Learning (FL) enables participants to collaboratively train models while safeguarding data privacy. This paper investigates the synergy between blockchain's security features and FL's privacy-preserving model training capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T07:08:26Z)
• Generative AI-enabled Blockchain Networks: Fundamentals, Applications, and Case Study [73.87110604150315]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has emerged as a promising solution to address challenges of blockchain technology. In this paper, we first introduce GAI techniques, outline their applications, and discuss existing solutions for integrating GAI into blockchains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-28T10:46:17Z)
• Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
  "Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
• A Reference Architecture for Designing Foundation Model based Systems [28.826700360670515]
  There is a broad consensus that foundations models will be the fundamental building blocks for future AI systems. incorporating foundations models into AI systems raises significant concerns about responsible and safe AI. The paper proposes a pattern-oriented reference architecture for designing responsible foundation-model-based systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-13T05:01:03Z)
• On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models [256.61956234436553]
  We call these models foundation models to underscore their critically central yet incomplete character. This report provides a thorough account of the opportunities and risks of foundation models. To tackle these questions, we believe much of the critical research on foundation models will require deep interdisciplinary collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-16T17:50:08Z)
• A Decentralized Approach Towards Responsible AI in Social Ecosystems [0.0]
  We present a framework that provides computational facilities for parties in a social ecosystem to produce the desired AI behaviors. We analyze AI systems at the architecture level and propose two cryptographic mechanisms for an AI system architecture. We argue the case that a decentralized approach is the most promising path towards Responsible AI from both the computer science and social science perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T06:33:42Z)
• Distributed and Democratized Learning: Philosophy and Research Challenges [80.39805582015133]
  We propose a novel design philosophy called democratized learning (Dem-AI) Inspired by the societal groups of humans, the specialized groups of learning agents in the proposed Dem-AI system are self-organized in a hierarchical structure to collectively perform learning tasks more efficiently. We present a reference design as a guideline to realize future Dem-AI systems, inspired by various interdisciplinary fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-18T08:45:10Z)
• AAAI FSS-19: Human-Centered AI: Trustworthiness of AI Models and Data Proceedings [8.445274192818825]
  It is crucial for predictive models to be uncertainty-aware and yield trustworthy predictions. The focus of this symposium was on AI systems to improve data quality and technical robustness and safety. submissions from broadly defined areas also discussed approaches addressing requirements such as explainable models, human trust and ethical aspects of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-15T15:30:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.