Explainable AI for tool wear prediction in turning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08765v1
• Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 03:36:13 GMT
• Title: Explainable AI for tool wear prediction in turning
• Authors: Saleh Valizadeh Sotubadi and Rui Liu and Vinh Neguyen
• Abstract summary: This research aims develop an Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) framework to facilitate human-understandable solutions for tool wear prediction during turning. A random forest algorithm was used as the supervised Machine Learning (ML) classifier for training and binary classification. The Shapley criterion was used to explain the predictions of the trained ML classifier.
• Score: 3.391256280235937
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: This research aims develop an Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) framework to facilitate human-understandable solutions for tool wear prediction during turning. A random forest algorithm was used as the supervised Machine Learning (ML) classifier for training and binary classification using acceleration, acoustics, temperature, and spindle speed during the orthogonal tube turning process as input features. The ML classifier was used to predict the condition of the tool after the cutting process, which was determined in a binary class form indicating if the cutting tool was available or failed. After the training process, the Shapley criterion was used to explain the predictions of the trained ML classifier. Specifically, the significance of each input feature in the decision-making and classification was identified to explain the reasoning of the ML classifier predictions. After implementing the Shapley criterion on all testing datasets, the tool temperature was identified as the most significant feature in determining the classification of available versus failed cutting tools. Hence, this research demonstrates capability of XAI to provide machining operators the ability to diagnose and understand complex ML classifiers in prediction of tool wear.

Related papers

• Attribute-to-Delete: Machine Unlearning via Datamodel Matching [65.13151619119782]
  Machine unlearning -- efficiently removing a small "forget set" training data on a pre-divertrained machine learning model -- has recently attracted interest. Recent research shows that machine unlearning techniques do not hold up in such a challenging setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T17:20:10Z)
• Comprehensive Study Of Predictive Maintenance In Industries Using Classification Models And LSTM Model [0.0]
  The study aims to delve into various machine learning classification techniques, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest, Logistic Regression, and Convolutional Neural Network LSTM-Based, for predicting and analyzing machine performance. The primary objective of the study is to assess these algorithms' performance in predicting and analyzing machine performance, considering factors such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T12:47:45Z)
• Active Inference on the Edge: A Design Study [5.815300670677979]
  Active Inference (ACI) is a concept from neuroscience that describes how the brain constantly predicts and evaluates sensory information to decrease long-term surprise. We show how our ACI agent was able to quickly and traceably solve an optimization problem while fulfilling requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-17T16:03:04Z)
• XAL: EXplainable Active Learning Makes Classifiers Better Low-resource Learners [71.8257151788923]
  We propose a novel Explainable Active Learning framework (XAL) for low-resource text classification. XAL encourages classifiers to justify their inferences and delve into unlabeled data for which they cannot provide reasonable explanations. Experiments on six datasets show that XAL achieves consistent improvement over 9 strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T08:07:04Z)
• FIND: A Function Description Benchmark for Evaluating Interpretability Methods [86.80718559904854]
  This paper introduces FIND (Function INterpretation and Description), a benchmark suite for evaluating automated interpretability methods. FIND contains functions that resemble components of trained neural networks, and accompanying descriptions of the kind we seek to generate. We evaluate methods that use pretrained language models to produce descriptions of function behavior in natural language and code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-07T17:47:26Z)
• RF+clust for Leave-One-Problem-Out Performance Prediction [0.9281671380673306]
  We study leave-one-problem-out (LOPO) performance prediction. We analyze whether standard random forest (RF) model predictions can be improved by calibrating them with a weighted average of performance values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-23T16:14:59Z)
• VCNet: A self-explaining model for realistic counterfactual generation [52.77024349608834]
  Counterfactual explanation is a class of methods to make local explanations of machine learning decisions. We present VCNet-Variational Counter Net, a model architecture that combines a predictor and a counterfactual generator. We show that VCNet is able to both generate predictions, and to generate counterfactual explanations without having to solve another minimisation problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-21T08:45:32Z)
• An Explainable Regression Framework for Predicting Remaining Useful Life of Machines [6.374451442486538]
  This paper proposes an explainable regression framework for the prediction of machines' Remaining Useful Life (RUL) We also evaluate several Machine Learning (ML) algorithms including classical and Neural Networks (NNs) based solutions for the task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-28T15:44:12Z)
• Hessian-based toolbox for reliable and interpretable machine learning in physics [58.720142291102135]
  We present a toolbox for interpretability and reliability, extrapolation of the model architecture. It provides a notion of the influence of the input data on the prediction at a given test point, an estimation of the uncertainty of the model predictions, and an agnostic score for the model predictions. Our work opens the road to the systematic use of interpretability and reliability methods in ML applied to physics and, more generally, science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-04T16:32:59Z)
• Automated Machine Learning Techniques for Data Streams [91.3755431537592]
  This paper surveys the state-of-the-art open-source AutoML tools, applies them to data collected from streams, and measures how their performance changes over time. The results show that off-the-shelf AutoML tools can provide satisfactory results but in the presence of concept drift, detection or adaptation techniques have to be applied to maintain the predictive accuracy over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T11:42:46Z)
• Explainable AI for Classification using Probabilistic Logic Inference [9.656846523452502]
  We present an explainable classification method. Our method works by first constructing a symbolic Knowledge Base from the training data, and then performing probabilistic inferences on such Knowledge Base with linear programming. It identifies decisive features that are responsible for a classification as explanations and produces results similar to the ones found by SHAP, a state of the artley Value based method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-05T11:39:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.