Capturing Popularity Trends: A Simplistic Non-Personalized Approach for Enhanced Item Recommendation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08799v1
• Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 06:20:03 GMT
• Title: Capturing Popularity Trends: A Simplistic Non-Personalized Approach for Enhanced Item Recommendation
• Authors: Jiazheng Jing, Yinan Zhang, Xin Zhou, Zhiqi Shen
• Abstract summary: Popularity-Aware Recommender (PARE) makes non-personalized recommendations by predicting the items that will attain the highest popularity. To our knowledge, this is the first work to explicitly model item popularity in recommendation systems.
• Score: 10.606845291519932
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recommender systems have been gaining increasing research attention over the years. Most existing recommendation methods focus on capturing users' personalized preferences through historical user-item interactions, which may potentially violate user privacy. Additionally, these approaches often overlook the significance of the temporal fluctuation in item popularity that can sway users' decision-making. To bridge this gap, we propose Popularity-Aware Recommender (PARE), which makes non-personalized recommendations by predicting the items that will attain the highest popularity. PARE consists of four modules, each focusing on a different aspect: popularity history, temporal impact, periodic impact, and side information. Finally, an attention layer is leveraged to fuse the outputs of four modules. To our knowledge, this is the first work to explicitly model item popularity in recommendation systems. Extensive experiments show that PARE performs on par or even better than sophisticated state-of-the-art recommendation methods. Since PARE prioritizes item popularity over personalized user preferences, it can enhance existing recommendation methods as a complementary component. Our experiments demonstrate that integrating PARE with existing recommendation methods significantly surpasses the performance of standalone models, highlighting PARE's potential as a complement to existing recommendation methods. Furthermore, the simplicity of PARE makes it immensely practical for industrial applications and a valuable baseline for future research.

Related papers

• Enhancing Sequential Music Recommendation with Personalized Popularity Awareness [56.972624411205224]
  This paper introduces a novel approach that incorporates personalized popularity information into sequential recommendation. Experimental results demonstrate that a Personalized Most Popular recommender outperforms existing state-of-the-art models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-06T15:05:12Z)
• Transparency, Privacy, and Fairness in Recommender Systems [0.19036571490366497]
  This habilitation elaborates on aspects related to (i) transparency and cognitive models, (ii) privacy and limited preference information, and (iii) fairness and popularity bias in recommender systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T08:37:14Z)
• The Fault in Our Recommendations: On the Perils of Optimizing the Measurable [2.6217304977339473]
  We show that optimizing for engagement can lead to significant utility losses. We propose a utility-aware policy that initially recommends a mix of popular and niche content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T02:12:17Z)
• A First Look at Selection Bias in Preference Elicitation for Recommendation [64.44255178199846]
  We study the effect of selection bias in preference elicitation on the resulting recommendations. A big hurdle is the lack of any publicly available dataset that has preference elicitation interactions. We propose a simulation of a topic-based preference elicitation process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T14:56:56Z)
• Impression-Aware Recommender Systems [57.38537491535016]
  Novel data sources bring new opportunities to improve the quality of recommender systems. Researchers may use impressions to refine user preferences and overcome the current limitations in recommender systems research. We present a systematic literature review on recommender systems using impressions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T16:16:02Z)
• A Survey on Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems [5.952279576277445]
  We discuss the potential reasons for popularity bias and review existing approaches to detect, mitigate and quantify popularity bias in recommender systems. We critically discuss todays literature, where we observe that the research is almost entirely based on computational experiments and on certain assumptions regarding the practical effects of including long-tail items in the recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T12:58:11Z)
• A Review on Pushing the Limits of Baseline Recommendation Systems with the integration of Opinion Mining & Information Retrieval Techniques [0.0]
  Recommendation Systems allow users to identify trending items among a community while being timely and relevant to the user's expectations. Deep Learning methods have been brought forward to achieve better quality recommendations. Researchers have tried to expand on the capabilities of standard recommendation systems to provide the most effective recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-03T22:13:33Z)
• PipAttack: Poisoning Federated Recommender Systems forManipulating Item Promotion [58.870444954499014]
  A common practice is to subsume recommender systems under the decentralized federated learning paradigm. We present a systematic approach to backdooring federated recommender systems for targeted item promotion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-21T06:48:35Z)
• PURS: Personalized Unexpected Recommender System for Improving User Satisfaction [76.98616102965023]
  We describe a novel Personalized Unexpected Recommender System (PURS) model that incorporates unexpectedness into the recommendation process. Extensive offline experiments on three real-world datasets illustrate that the proposed PURS model significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-05T01:33:21Z)
• User-centered Evaluation of Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems [4.30484058393522]
  Recommendation and ranking systems suffer from popularity bias; the tendency of the algorithm to favor a few popular items while under-representing the majority of other items. In this paper, we show the limitations of the existing metrics to evaluate popularity bias mitigation when we want to assess these algorithms from the users' perspective. We present an effective approach that mitigates popularity bias from the user-centered point of view.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-10T22:12:51Z)
• Reward Constrained Interactive Recommendation with Natural Language Feedback [158.8095688415973]
  We propose a novel constraint-augmented reinforcement learning (RL) framework to efficiently incorporate user preferences over time. Specifically, we leverage a discriminator to detect recommendations violating user historical preference. Our proposed framework is general and is further extended to the task of constrained text generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-04T16:23:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.