Performance Comparison of Design Optimization and Deep Learning-based Inverse Design

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.13000v1
• Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 06:04:54 GMT
• Title: Performance Comparison of Design Optimization and Deep Learning-based Inverse Design
• Authors: Minyoung Jwa, Jihoon Kim, Seungyeon Shin, Ah-hyeon Jin, Dongju Shin, Namwoo Kang
• Abstract summary: This paper compares the performance of traditional design optimization methods with deep learning-based inverse design methods. It provides guidelines that can be taken into account for the future utilization of deep learning-based inverse design.
• Score: 15.620304857903069
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Surrogate model-based optimization has been increasingly used in the field of engineering design. It involves creating a surrogate model with objective functions or constraints based on the data obtained from simulations or real-world experiments, and then finding the optimal solution from the model using numerical optimization methods. Recent advancements in deep learning-based inverse design methods have made it possible to generate real-time optimal solutions for engineering design problems, eliminating the requirement for iterative optimization processes. Nevertheless, no comprehensive study has yet closely examined the specific advantages and disadvantages of this novel approach compared to the traditional design optimization method. The objective of this paper is to compare the performance of traditional design optimization methods with deep learning-based inverse design methods by employing benchmark problems across various scenarios. Based on the findings of this study, we provide guidelines that can be taken into account for the future utilization of deep learning-based inverse design. It is anticipated that these guidelines will enhance the practical applicability of this approach to real engineering design problems.

Related papers

• Learning Joint Models of Prediction and Optimization [56.04498536842065]
  Predict-Then-Then framework uses machine learning models to predict unknown parameters of an optimization problem from features before solving. This paper proposes an alternative method, in which optimal solutions are learned directly from the observable features by joint predictive models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-07T19:52:14Z)
• Deep Optimal Experimental Design for Parameter Estimation Problems [4.097001355074171]
  We investigate a new experimental design methodology that uses deep learning. We show that the training of a network as a Likelihood Free Estor can be used to significantly simplify the design process. Deep design improves the quality of the recovery process for parameter estimation problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T05:13:33Z)
• Model Uncertainty in Evolutionary Optimization and Bayesian Optimization: A Comparative Analysis [5.6787965501364335]
  Black-box optimization problems are common in many real-world applications. These problems require optimization through input-output interactions without access to internal workings. Two widely used gradient-free optimization techniques are employed to address such challenges. This paper aims to elucidate the similarities and differences in the utilization of model uncertainty between these two methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T13:59:19Z)
• Efficient Inverse Design Optimization through Multi-fidelity Simulations, Machine Learning, and Search Space Reduction Strategies [0.8646443773218541]
  This paper introduces a methodology designed to augment the inverse design optimization process in scenarios constrained by limited compute. The proposed methodology is analyzed on two distinct engineering inverse design problems: airfoil inverse design and the scalar field reconstruction problem. Notably, this method is adaptable across any inverse design application, facilitating a synergy between a representative low-fidelity ML model, and high-fidelity simulation, and can be seamlessly applied across any variety of population-based optimization algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-06T18:20:46Z)
• Aligning Optimization Trajectories with Diffusion Models for Constrained Design Generation [17.164961143132473]
  We introduce a learning framework that demonstrates the efficacy of aligning the sampling trajectory of diffusion models with the optimization trajectory derived from traditional physics-based methods. Our method allows for generating feasible and high-performance designs in as few as two steps without the need for expensive preprocessing, external surrogate models, or additional labeled data. Our results demonstrate that TA outperforms state-of-the-art deep generative models on in-distribution configurations and halves the inference computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T09:16:07Z)
• Fusion of ML with numerical simulation for optimized propeller design [0.6767885381740952]
  We propose an alternative way to use ML model to surrogate the design process. By using this trained surrogate model with the traditional optimization method, we can get the best of both worlds. Empirical evaluations of propeller design problems show that a better efficient design can be found in fewer evaluations using SAO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T16:42:07Z)
• Backpropagation of Unrolled Solvers with Folded Optimization [55.04219793298687]
  The integration of constrained optimization models as components in deep networks has led to promising advances on many specialized learning tasks. One typical strategy is algorithm unrolling, which relies on automatic differentiation through the operations of an iterative solver. This paper provides theoretical insights into the backward pass of unrolled optimization, leading to a system for generating efficiently solvable analytical models of backpropagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-28T01:50:42Z)
• Design Amortization for Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design [70.13948372218849]
  We build off of successful variational approaches, which optimize a parameterized variational model with respect to bounds on the expected information gain (EIG) We present a novel neural architecture that allows experimenters to optimize a single variational model that can estimate the EIG for potentially infinitely many designs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-07T02:12:34Z)
• Investigating Positive and Negative Qualities of Human-in-the-Loop Optimization for Designing Interaction Techniques [55.492211642128446]
  Designers reportedly struggle with design optimization tasks where they are asked to find a combination of design parameters that maximizes a given set of objectives. Model-based computational design algorithms assist designers by generating design examples during design. Black box methods for assistance, on the other hand, can work with any design problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-15T20:40:43Z)
• An AI-Assisted Design Method for Topology Optimization Without Pre-Optimized Training Data [68.8204255655161]
  An AI-assisted design method based on topology optimization is presented, which is able to obtain optimized designs in a direct way. Designs are provided by an artificial neural network, the predictor, on the basis of boundary conditions and degree of filling as input data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-11T14:33:27Z)
• Automatically Learning Compact Quality-aware Surrogates for Optimization Problems [55.94450542785096]
  Solving optimization problems with unknown parameters requires learning a predictive model to predict the values of the unknown parameters and then solving the problem using these values. Recent work has shown that including the optimization problem as a layer in a complex training model pipeline results in predictions of iteration of unobserved decision making. We show that we can improve solution quality by learning a low-dimensional surrogate model of a large optimization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-18T19:11:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.