Towards a Rigorous Analysis of Mutual Information in Contrastive Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.15704v1
• Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 01:59:42 GMT
• Title: Towards a Rigorous Analysis of Mutual Information in Contrastive Learning
• Authors: Kyungeun Lee, Jaeill Kim, Suhyun Kang, Wonjong Rhee
• Abstract summary: We introduce three novel methods and a few related theorems, aimed at enhancing the rigor of mutual information analysis. Specifically, we investigate small batch size, mutual information as a measure, and the InfoMin principle.
• Score: 3.6048794343841766
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Contrastive learning has emerged as a cornerstone in recent achievements of unsupervised representation learning. Its primary paradigm involves an instance discrimination task with a mutual information loss. The loss is known as InfoNCE and it has yielded vital insights into contrastive learning through the lens of mutual information analysis. However, the estimation of mutual information can prove challenging, creating a gap between the elegance of its mathematical foundation and the complexity of its estimation. As a result, drawing rigorous insights or conclusions from mutual information analysis becomes intricate. In this study, we introduce three novel methods and a few related theorems, aimed at enhancing the rigor of mutual information analysis. Despite their simplicity, these methods can carry substantial utility. Leveraging these approaches, we reassess three instances of contrastive learning analysis, illustrating their capacity to facilitate deeper comprehension or to rectify pre-existing misconceptions. Specifically, we investigate small batch size, mutual information as a measure, and the InfoMin principle.

Related papers

• Hierarchical Deconstruction of LLM Reasoning: A Graph-Based Framework for Analyzing Knowledge Utilization [30.349165483935682]
  How large language models (LLMs) use their knowledge for reasoning is not yet well understood. We develop the DepthQA dataset, deconstructing questions into three depths: (i) recalling conceptual knowledge, (ii) applying procedural knowledge, and (iii) analyzing strategic knowledge. Distinct patterns of discrepancies are observed across model capacity and possibility of training data memorization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T19:29:36Z)
• Heterogeneous Contrastive Learning for Foundation Models and Beyond [73.74745053250619]
  In the era of big data and Artificial Intelligence, an emerging paradigm is to utilize contrastive self-supervised learning to model large-scale heterogeneous data. This survey critically evaluates the current landscape of heterogeneous contrastive learning for foundation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-30T02:55:49Z)
• Separating common from salient patterns with Contrastive Representation Learning [2.250968907999846]
  Contrastive Analysis aims at separating common factors of variation between two datasets. Current models based on Variational Auto-Encoders have shown poor performance in learning semantically-expressive representations. We propose to leverage the ability of Contrastive Learning to learn semantically expressive representations well adapted for Contrastive Analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T08:17:13Z)
• Singular Regularization with Information Bottleneck Improves Model's Adversarial Robustness [30.361227245739745]
  Adversarial examples are one of the most severe threats to deep learning models. We study adversarial information as unstructured noise, which does not have a clear pattern. We propose a new module to regularize adversarial information and combine information bottleneck theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T09:07:30Z)
• Contrastive Learning for Inference in Dialogue [56.20733835058695]
  Inference, especially those derived from inductive processes, is a crucial component in our conversation. Recent large language models show remarkable advances in inference tasks. But their performance in inductive reasoning, where not all information is present in the context, is far behind deductive reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T04:49:36Z)
• Explaining Explainability: Towards Deeper Actionable Insights into Deep Learning through Second-order Explainability [70.60433013657693]
  Second-order explainable AI (SOXAI) was recently proposed to extend explainable AI (XAI) from the instance level to the dataset level. We demonstrate for the first time, via example classification and segmentation cases, that eliminating irrelevant concepts from the training set based on actionable insights from SOXAI can enhance a model's performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T23:24:01Z)
• Anti-Retroactive Interference for Lifelong Learning [65.50683752919089]
  We design a paradigm for lifelong learning based on meta-learning and associative mechanism of the brain. It tackles the problem from two aspects: extracting knowledge and memorizing knowledge. It is theoretically analyzed that the proposed learning paradigm can make the models of different tasks converge to the same optimum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-27T09:27:36Z)
• Visualizing and Understanding Contrastive Learning [22.553990823550784]
  We design visual explanation methods that contribute towards understanding similarity learning tasks from pairs of images. We also adapt existing metrics, used to evaluate visual explanations of image classification systems, to suit pairs of explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-20T13:01:46Z)
• Variational Distillation for Multi-View Learning [104.17551354374821]
  We design several variational information bottlenecks to exploit two key characteristics for multi-view representation learning. Under rigorously theoretical guarantee, our approach enables IB to grasp the intrinsic correlation between observations and semantic labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-20T03:09:46Z)
• Which Mutual-Information Representation Learning Objectives are Sufficient for Control? [80.2534918595143]
  Mutual information provides an appealing formalism for learning representations of data. This paper formalizes the sufficiency of a state representation for learning and representing the optimal policy. Surprisingly, we find that two of these objectives can yield insufficient representations given mild and common assumptions on the structure of the MDP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T10:12:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.