Hierarchical Deconstruction of LLM Reasoning: A Graph-Based Framework for Analyzing Knowledge Utilization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.19502v2
- Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 20:55:21 GMT
- Title: Hierarchical Deconstruction of LLM Reasoning: A Graph-Based Framework for Analyzing Knowledge Utilization
- Authors: Miyoung Ko, Sue Hyun Park, Joonsuk Park, Minjoon Seo,
- Abstract summary: How large language models (LLMs) use their knowledge for reasoning is not yet well understood.
We develop the DepthQA dataset, deconstructing questions into three depths: (i) recalling conceptual knowledge, (ii) applying procedural knowledge, and (iii) analyzing strategic knowledge.
Distinct patterns of discrepancies are observed across model capacity and possibility of training data memorization.
- Score: 30.349165483935682
- License:
- Abstract: Despite the advances in large language models (LLMs), how they use their knowledge for reasoning is not yet well understood. In this study, we propose a method that deconstructs complex real-world questions into a graph, representing each question as a node with predecessors of background knowledge needed to solve the question. We develop the DepthQA dataset, deconstructing questions into three depths: (i) recalling conceptual knowledge, (ii) applying procedural knowledge, and (iii) analyzing strategic knowledge. Based on a hierarchical graph, we quantify forward discrepancy, a discrepancy in LLM performance on simpler sub-problems versus complex questions. We also measure backward discrepancy where LLMs answer complex questions but struggle with simpler ones. Our analysis shows that smaller models exhibit more discrepancies than larger models. Distinct patterns of discrepancies are observed across model capacity and possibility of training data memorization. Additionally, guiding models from simpler to complex questions through multi-turn interactions improves performance across model sizes, highlighting the importance of structured intermediate steps in knowledge reasoning. This work enhances our understanding of LLM reasoning and suggests ways to improve their problem-solving abilities.
Related papers
- Large Language Models and Mathematical Reasoning Failures [1.6114012813668932]
This paper investigates the mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) using 50 newly constructed high-school-level word problems.
We rigorously analyze both final answers and solution steps to identify reasoning failures.
We find that while newer models (e.g., o3-mini, deepseek-r1) achieve higher accuracy, all models exhibit errors in spatial reasoning, strategic planning, and arithmetic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T09:07:32Z) - Reasoning with Graphs: Structuring Implicit Knowledge to Enhance LLMs Reasoning [73.2950349728376]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success across a wide range of tasks.
However, they still encounter challenges in reasoning tasks that require understanding and inferring relationships between pieces of information.
This challenge is particularly pronounced in tasks involving multi-step processes, such as logical reasoning and multi-hop question answering.
We propose Reasoning with Graphs (RwG) by first constructing explicit graphs from the context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-14T05:18:20Z) - Disentangling Memory and Reasoning Ability in Large Language Models [97.26827060106581]
We propose a new inference paradigm that decomposes the complex inference process into two distinct and clear actions.
Our experiment results show that this decomposition improves model performance and enhances the interpretability of the inference process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-20T17:55:38Z) - Make LLMs better zero-shot reasoners: Structure-orientated autonomous reasoning [52.83539473110143]
We introduce a novel structure-oriented analysis method to help Large Language Models (LLMs) better understand a question.
To further improve the reliability in complex question-answering tasks, we propose a multi-agent reasoning system, Structure-oriented Autonomous Reasoning Agents (SARA)
Extensive experiments verify the effectiveness of the proposed reasoning system. Surprisingly, in some cases, the system even surpasses few-shot methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T05:30:33Z) - Reasoning with Large Language Models, a Survey [2.831296564800826]
This paper reviews the rapidly expanding field of prompt-based reasoning with LLMs.
Our taxonomy identifies different ways to generate, evaluate, and control multi-step reasoning.
We find that self-improvement, self-reflection, and some meta abilities of the reasoning processes are possible through the judicious use of prompts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T08:49:35Z) - Knowledge Tagging System on Math Questions via LLMs with Flexible Demonstration Retriever [48.5585921817745]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are used to automate the knowledge tagging task.
We show the strong performance of zero- and few-shot results over math questions knowledge tagging tasks.
By proposing a reinforcement learning-based demonstration retriever, we successfully exploit the great potential of different-sized LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-19T23:30:01Z) - Untangle the KNOT: Interweaving Conflicting Knowledge and Reasoning Skills in Large Language Models [51.72963030032491]
Knowledge documents for large language models (LLMs) may conflict with the memory of LLMs due to outdated or incorrect knowledge.
We construct a new dataset, dubbed KNOT, for knowledge conflict resolution examination in the form of question answering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-04T16:40:11Z) - Improving Open Information Extraction with Large Language Models: A
Study on Demonstration Uncertainty [52.72790059506241]
Open Information Extraction (OIE) task aims at extracting structured facts from unstructured text.
Despite the potential of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT as a general task solver, they lag behind state-of-the-art (supervised) methods in OIE tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-07T01:35:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.