Pressmatch: Automated journalist recommendation for media coverage with
Nearest Neighbor search
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.00944v1
- Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2023 13:41:29 GMT
- Title: Pressmatch: Automated journalist recommendation for media coverage with
Nearest Neighbor search
- Authors: Soumya Parekh, Jay Patel
- Abstract summary: Good media coverage ensures greater product reach and drives audience engagement for those products.
Keeping up with journalist beats and curating a media contacts list is often a huge and time-consuming task.
This study proposes a model to automate and expedite the process by recommending suitable journalists to run media coverage on the press releases provided by the user.
- Score: 0.6118897979046375
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Slating a product for release often involves pitching journalists to run
stories on your press release. Good media coverage often ensures greater
product reach and drives audience engagement for those products. Hence,
ensuring that those releases are pitched to the right journalists with relevant
interests is crucial, since they receive several pitches daily. Keeping up with
journalist beats and curating a media contacts list is often a huge and
time-consuming task. This study proposes a model to automate and expedite the
process by recommending suitable journalists to run media coverage on the press
releases provided by the user.
Related papers
- Automated Journalism [0.0]
Automated journalism refers to the process of automating the collection, production, and distribution of news content.
Early adopters have praised the usefulness of automated journalism for generating routine news based on clean, structured data.
Research on automated journalism is alerting to the dangers of using algorithms for news creation and distribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-05T12:19:03Z) - AI as a Tool for Fair Journalism: Case Studies from Malta [0.07499722271664144]
Two projects focus on media monitoring and present tools designed to analyse potential biases in news articles and television news segments.
The first project uses Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing techniques to analyse the coherence between images in news articles and their corresponding captions, headlines, and article bodies.
The second project employs computer vision techniques to track individuals on-screen time or visual exposure in news videos, providing queryable data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-08T15:02:39Z) - PressProtect: Helping Journalists Navigate Social Media in the Face of Online Harassment [4.790507122630804]
We conduct need-finding interviews with Asian American and Pacific Islander journalists to understand where existing platform tools and newsroom resources fall short in adequately protecting journalists.
We build PressProtect, an interface that provides journalists greater agency when engaging with readers on Twitter/X.
We conclude with a discussion of our findings and recommendations for social platforms hoping to build defensive defaults for journalists facing online harassment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-19T21:16:41Z) - Tracking the Newsworthiness of Public Documents [107.12303391111014]
This work focuses on news coverage of local public policy in the San Francisco Bay Area by the San Francisco Chronicle.
First, we gather news articles, public policy documents and meeting recordings and link them using probabilistic relational modeling.
Second, we define a new task: newsworthiness prediction, to predict if a policy item will get covered.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T10:05:26Z) - Prompt-and-Align: Prompt-Based Social Alignment for Few-Shot Fake News
Detection [50.07850264495737]
"Prompt-and-Align" (P&A) is a novel prompt-based paradigm for few-shot fake news detection.
We show that P&A sets new states-of-the-art for few-shot fake news detection performance by significant margins.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-28T13:19:43Z) - Identifying Informational Sources in News Articles [109.70475599552523]
We build the largest and widest-ranging annotated dataset of informational sources used in news writing.
We introduce a novel task, source prediction, to study the compositionality of sources in news articles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T08:56:35Z) - Understanding Journalists' Workflows in News Curation [10.16152286476502]
We interviewed journalists who curate newsletters from around the world.
Our findings lay out the role of journalists' prior experience in the value they bring into the curation process.
We highlight the importance of hybrid curation and provide design insights on how technology can support the work of these experts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-31T21:16:22Z) - Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases.
We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions.
Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z) - Plattformen und neue Technologien im Journalismus: Ergebnisse einer
Online-Befragung von Journalistinnen und Journalisten in Deutschland [0.5076419064097732]
385 journalists in Germany were surveyed about platforms in journalism.
Freelancers have a higher commitment than employed journalists.
For German journalists it is important that the platform is developed in Europe or Germany.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-13T10:05:56Z) - Viable Threat on News Reading: Generating Biased News Using Natural
Language Models [49.90665530780664]
We show that publicly available language models can reliably generate biased news content based on an input original news.
We also show that a large number of high-quality biased news articles can be generated using controllable text generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-05T16:55:39Z) - Political audience diversity and news reliability in algorithmic ranking [54.23273310155137]
We propose using the political diversity of a website's audience as a quality signal.
Using news source reliability ratings from domain experts and web browsing data from a diverse sample of 6,890 U.S. citizens, we first show that websites with more extreme and less politically diverse audiences have lower journalistic standards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-16T02:13:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.