Automated Journalism
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03462v1
- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 12:19:03 GMT
- Title: Automated Journalism
- Authors: Wang Ngai Yeung, Tomás Dodds,
- Abstract summary: Automated journalism refers to the process of automating the collection, production, and distribution of news content.
Early adopters have praised the usefulness of automated journalism for generating routine news based on clean, structured data.
Research on automated journalism is alerting to the dangers of using algorithms for news creation and distribution.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Developed as a response to the increasing popularity of data-driven journalism, automated journalism refers to the process of automating the collection, production, and distribution of news content and other data with the assistance of computer programs. Although the algorithmic technologies associated with automated journalism remain in the initial stage of development, early adopters have already praised the usefulness of automated journalism for generating routine news based on clean, structured data. Most noticeably, the Associated Press and The New York Times have been automating news content to cover financial and sports issues for over a decade. Nevertheless, research on automated journalism is also alerting to the dangers of using algorithms for news creation and distribution, including the possible bias behind AI systems or the human bias of those who develop computer programs. The popularization of automated news content also has important implications for the infrastructure of the newsroom, the role performance of journalists and other non-journalistic professionals, and the distribution of news content to a datafied audience.
Related papers
- AI as a Tool for Fair Journalism: Case Studies from Malta [0.07499722271664144]
Two projects focus on media monitoring and present tools designed to analyse potential biases in news articles and television news segments.
The first project uses Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing techniques to analyse the coherence between images in news articles and their corresponding captions, headlines, and article bodies.
The second project employs computer vision techniques to track individuals on-screen time or visual exposure in news videos, providing queryable data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-08T15:02:39Z) - Adapting Fake News Detection to the Era of Large Language Models [48.5847914481222]
We study the interplay between machine-(paraphrased) real news, machine-generated fake news, human-written fake news, and human-written real news.
Our experiments reveal an interesting pattern that detectors trained exclusively on human-written articles can indeed perform well at detecting machine-generated fake news, but not vice versa.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-02T08:39:45Z) - Prompt-and-Align: Prompt-Based Social Alignment for Few-Shot Fake News
Detection [50.07850264495737]
"Prompt-and-Align" (P&A) is a novel prompt-based paradigm for few-shot fake news detection.
We show that P&A sets new states-of-the-art for few-shot fake news detection performance by significant margins.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-28T13:19:43Z) - An Interactive Framework for Profiling News Media Sources [26.386860411085053]
We propose an interactive framework for news media profiling.
It combines the strengths of graph based news media profiling models, Pre-trained Large Language Models, and human insight.
With as little as 5 human interactions, our framework can rapidly detect fake and biased news media.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-14T02:03:45Z) - Pressmatch: Automated journalist recommendation for media coverage with
Nearest Neighbor search [0.6118897979046375]
Good media coverage ensures greater product reach and drives audience engagement for those products.
Keeping up with journalist beats and curating a media contacts list is often a huge and time-consuming task.
This study proposes a model to automate and expedite the process by recommending suitable journalists to run media coverage on the press releases provided by the user.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-02T13:41:29Z) - Identifying Informational Sources in News Articles [109.70475599552523]
We build the largest and widest-ranging annotated dataset of informational sources used in news writing.
We introduce a novel task, source prediction, to study the compositionality of sources in news articles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T08:56:35Z) - Understanding Journalists' Workflows in News Curation [10.16152286476502]
We interviewed journalists who curate newsletters from around the world.
Our findings lay out the role of journalists' prior experience in the value they bring into the curation process.
We highlight the importance of hybrid curation and provide design insights on how technology can support the work of these experts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-31T21:16:22Z) - Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases.
We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions.
Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z) - Quantifying Political Bias in News Articles [0.15229257192293202]
We aim to establish an automated model for evaluating ideological bias in online news articles.
The current automated model results show that model capability is not sufficient to be exploited for annotating the documents automatically.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-07T08:51:20Z) - Faking Fake News for Real Fake News Detection: Propaganda-loaded
Training Data Generation [105.20743048379387]
We propose a novel framework for generating training examples informed by the known styles and strategies of human-authored propaganda.
Specifically, we perform self-critical sequence training guided by natural language inference to ensure the validity of the generated articles.
Our experimental results show that fake news detectors trained on PropaNews are better at detecting human-written disinformation by 3.62 - 7.69% F1 score on two public datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-10T14:24:19Z) - Viable Threat on News Reading: Generating Biased News Using Natural
Language Models [49.90665530780664]
We show that publicly available language models can reliably generate biased news content based on an input original news.
We also show that a large number of high-quality biased news articles can be generated using controllable text generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-05T16:55:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.