Unveiling Theory of Mind in Large Language Models: A Parallel to Single Neurons in the Human Brain

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01660v1
• Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 15:26:15 GMT
• Title: Unveiling Theory of Mind in Large Language Models: A Parallel to Single Neurons in the Human Brain
• Authors: Mohsen Jamali, Ziv M. Williams, Jing Cai
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have been found to exhibit a certain level of Theory of Mind (ToM) The precise processes underlying LLM's capacity for ToM or their similarities with that of humans remains largely unknown.
• Score: 2.5350521110810056
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: With their recent development, large language models (LLMs) have been found to exhibit a certain level of Theory of Mind (ToM), a complex cognitive capacity that is related to our conscious mind and that allows us to infer another's beliefs and perspective. While human ToM capabilities are believed to derive from the neural activity of a broadly interconnected brain network, including that of dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) neurons, the precise processes underlying LLM's capacity for ToM or their similarities with that of humans remains largely unknown. In this study, we drew inspiration from the dmPFC neurons subserving human ToM and employed a similar methodology to examine whether LLMs exhibit comparable characteristics. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a striking resemblance between the two, as hidden embeddings (artificial neurons) within LLMs started to exhibit significant responsiveness to either true- or false-belief trials, suggesting their ability to represent another's perspective. These artificial embedding responses were closely correlated with the LLMs' performance during the ToM tasks, a property that was dependent on the size of the models. Further, the other's beliefs could be accurately decoded using the entire embeddings, indicating the presence of the embeddings' ToM capability at the population level. Together, our findings revealed an emergent property of LLMs' embeddings that modified their activities in response to ToM features, offering initial evidence of a parallel between the artificial model and neurons in the human brain.

Related papers

• Large Language Models Are Human-Like Internally [44.996518290660816]
  Recent cognitive modeling studies have reported that larger language models (LMs) exhibit a poorer fit to human reading behavior. We argue that prior conclusions were skewed by an exclusive focus on the final layers of LMs. Our analysis reveals that next-word probabilities derived from internal layers of larger LMs align with human sentence processing data as well as, or better than, those from smaller LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T18:48:32Z)
• Large Language Models as Theory of Mind Aware Generative Agents with Counterfactual Reflection [31.38516078163367]
  ToM-agent is designed to empower LLMs-based generative agents to simulate ToM in open-domain conversational interactions. ToM-agent disentangles the confidence from mental states, facilitating the emulation of an agent's perception of its counterpart's mental states. Our findings indicate that the ToM-agent can grasp the underlying reasons for their counterpart's behaviors beyond mere semantic-emotional supporting or decision-making based on common sense.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-26T00:32:38Z)
• Human-like conceptual representations emerge from language prediction [72.5875173689788]
  We investigated the emergence of human-like conceptual representations within large language models (LLMs) We found that LLMs were able to infer concepts from definitional descriptions and construct representation spaces that converge towards a shared, context-independent structure. Our work supports the view that LLMs serve as valuable tools for understanding complex human cognition and paves the way for better alignment between artificial and human intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T23:54:17Z)
• Humanlike Cognitive Patterns as Emergent Phenomena in Large Language Models [2.9312156642007294]
  We systematically review Large Language Models' capabilities across three important cognitive domains: decision-making biases, reasoning, and creativity. On decision-making, our synthesis reveals that while LLMs demonstrate several human-like biases, some biases observed in humans are absent. On reasoning, advanced LLMs like GPT-4 exhibit deliberative reasoning akin to human System-2 thinking, while smaller models fall short of human-level performance. A distinct dichotomy emerges in creativity: while LLMs excel in language-based creative tasks, such as storytelling, they struggle with divergent thinking tasks that require real-world context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T02:26:56Z)
• Brain-like Functional Organization within Large Language Models [58.93629121400745]
  The human brain has long inspired the pursuit of artificial intelligence (AI) Recent neuroimaging studies provide compelling evidence of alignment between the computational representation of artificial neural networks (ANNs) and the neural responses of the human brain to stimuli. In this study, we bridge this gap by directly coupling sub-groups of artificial neurons with functional brain networks (FBNs) This framework links the AN sub-groups to FBNs, enabling the delineation of brain-like functional organization within large language models (LLMs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T13:15:17Z)
• Perceptions to Beliefs: Exploring Precursory Inferences for Theory of Mind in Large Language Models [51.91448005607405]
  We evaluate key human ToM precursors by annotating characters' perceptions on ToMi and FANToM. We present PercepToM, a novel ToM method leveraging LLMs' strong perception inference capability while supplementing their limited perception-to-belief inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T14:58:29Z)
• Human-like object concept representations emerge naturally in multimodal large language models [24.003766123531545]
  We combined behavioral and neuroimaging analysis methods to uncover how the object concept representations in Large Language Models correlate with those of humans. The resulting 66-dimensional embeddings were found to be highly stable and predictive, and exhibited semantic clustering akin to human mental representations. This study advances our understanding of machine intelligence and informs the development of more human-like artificial cognitive systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T08:17:19Z)
• What if...?: Thinking Counterfactual Keywords Helps to Mitigate Hallucination in Large Multi-modal Models [50.97705264224828]
  We propose Counterfactual Inception, a novel method that implants counterfactual thinking into Large Multi-modal Models. We aim for the models to engage with and generate responses that span a wider contextual scene understanding. Comprehensive analyses across various LMMs, including both open-source and proprietary models, corroborate that counterfactual thinking significantly reduces hallucination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T11:27:20Z)
• Clever Hans or Neural Theory of Mind? Stress Testing Social Reasoning in Large Language Models [82.50173296858377]
  Many anecdotal examples were used to suggest newer large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and GPT-4 exhibit Neural Theory-of-Mind (N-ToM) We investigate the extent of LLMs' N-ToM through an extensive evaluation on 6 tasks and find that while LLMs exhibit certain N-ToM abilities, this behavior is far from being robust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T06:14:31Z)
• Multimodal foundation models are better simulators of the human brain [65.10501322822881]
  We present a newly-designed multimodal foundation model pre-trained on 15 million image-text pairs. We find that both visual and lingual encoders trained multimodally are more brain-like compared with unimodal ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-17T12:36:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.