Towards User Guided Actionable Recourse

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02517v1
• Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 18:06:09 GMT
• Title: Towards User Guided Actionable Recourse
• Authors: Jayanth Yetukuri, Ian Hardy and Yang Liu
• Abstract summary: Actionable Recourse (AR) describes recommendations of cost-efficient changes to a user's actionable features to help them obtain favorable outcomes. We propose a gradient-based approach to identify User Preferred Actionable Recourse (UP-AR)
• Score: 5.669106489320257
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Machine Learning's proliferation in critical fields such as healthcare, banking, and criminal justice has motivated the creation of tools which ensure trust and transparency in ML models. One such tool is Actionable Recourse (AR) for negatively impacted users. AR describes recommendations of cost-efficient changes to a user's actionable features to help them obtain favorable outcomes. Existing approaches for providing recourse optimize for properties such as proximity, sparsity, validity, and distance-based costs. However, an often-overlooked but crucial requirement for actionability is a consideration of User Preference to guide the recourse generation process. In this work, we attempt to capture user preferences via soft constraints in three simple forms: i) scoring continuous features, ii) bounding feature values and iii) ranking categorical features. Finally, we propose a gradient-based approach to identify User Preferred Actionable Recourse (UP-AR). We carried out extensive experiments to verify the effectiveness of our approach.

Related papers

• Quantifying User Coherence: A Unified Framework for Cross-Domain Recommendation Analysis [69.37718774071793]
  This paper introduces novel information-theoretic measures for understanding recommender systems. We evaluate 7 recommendation algorithms across 9 datasets, revealing the relationships between our measures and standard performance metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T13:02:07Z)
• GLANCE: Global Actions in a Nutshell for Counterfactual Explainability [10.25011737760687]
  We introduce GLANCE, a versatile and adaptive framework, comprising two algorithms. C-GLANCE employs a clustering approach that considers both the feature space and the space of counterfactual actions. T-GLANCE provides additional features to enhance flexibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T09:24:25Z)
• Introducing User Feedback-based Counterfactual Explanations (UFCE) [49.1574468325115]
  Counterfactual explanations (CEs) have emerged as a viable solution for generating comprehensible explanations in XAI. UFCE allows for the inclusion of user constraints to determine the smallest modifications in the subset of actionable features. UFCE outperforms two well-known CE methods in terms of textitproximity, textitsparsity, and textitfeasibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T20:09:44Z)
• Augmenting Unsupervised Reinforcement Learning with Self-Reference [63.68018737038331]
  Humans possess the ability to draw on past experiences explicitly when learning new tasks. We propose the Self-Reference (SR) approach, an add-on module explicitly designed to leverage historical information. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art results in terms of Interquartile Mean (IQM) performance and Optimality Gap reduction on the Unsupervised Reinforcement Learning Benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T09:07:34Z)
• Adversarial Batch Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Learn to Reward from Imperfect Demonstration for Interactive Recommendation [23.048841953423846]
  We focus on the problem of learning to reward, which is fundamental to reinforcement learning. Previous approaches either introduce additional procedures for learning to reward, thereby increasing the complexity of optimization. We propose a novel batch inverse reinforcement learning paradigm that achieves the desired properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T13:43:20Z)
• Explainable Active Learning for Preference Elicitation [0.0]
  We employ Active Learning (AL) to solve the addressed problem with the objective of maximizing information acquisition with minimal user effort. AL operates for selecting informative data from a large unlabeled set to inquire an oracle to label them. It harvests user feedback (given for the system's explanations on the presented items) over informative samples to update an underlying machine learning (ML) model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T09:22:33Z)
• Meta-Wrapper: Differentiable Wrapping Operator for User Interest Selection in CTR Prediction [97.99938802797377]
  Click-through rate (CTR) prediction, whose goal is to predict the probability of the user to click on an item, has become increasingly significant in recommender systems. Recent deep learning models with the ability to automatically extract the user interest from his/her behaviors have achieved great success. We propose a novel approach under the framework of the wrapper method, which is named Meta-Wrapper.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-28T03:28:15Z)
• MACE: An Efficient Model-Agnostic Framework for Counterfactual Explanation [132.77005365032468]
  We propose a novel framework of Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanation (MACE) In our MACE approach, we propose a novel RL-based method for finding good counterfactual examples and a gradient-less descent method for improving proximity. Experiments on public datasets validate the effectiveness with better validity, sparsity and proximity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T04:57:06Z)
• Probabilistically Robust Recourse: Navigating the Trade-offs between Costs and Robustness in Algorithmic Recourse [34.39887495671287]
  We propose an objective function which simultaneously minimizes the gap between the achieved (resulting) and desired recourse invalidation rates. We develop novel theoretical results to characterize the recourse invalidation rates corresponding to any given instance. Experimental evaluation with multiple real world datasets demonstrates the efficacy of the proposed framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-13T21:39:24Z)
• Low-Cost Algorithmic Recourse for Users With Uncertain Cost Functions [74.00030431081751]
  We formalize the notion of user-specific cost functions and introduce a new method for identifying actionable recourses for users. Our method satisfies up to 25.89 percentage points more users compared to strong baseline methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T19:49:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.