Laws of Physics
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.03484v1
- Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 05:22:24 GMT
- Title: Laws of Physics
- Authors: Eddy Keming Chen
- Abstract summary: Despite its apparent complexity, our world seems to be governed by simple laws of physics.
I suggest that laws are fundamental facts that govern the world by constraining its physical possibilities.
I examine three hallmarks of laws--simplicity, exactness, and objectivity--and discuss whether and how they may be associated with laws of physics.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Despite its apparent complexity, our world seems to be governed by simple
laws of physics. This volume provides a philosophical introduction to such
laws. I explain how they are connected to some of the central issues in
philosophy, such as ontology, possibility, explanation, induction,
counterfactuals, time, determinism, and fundamentality. I suggest that laws are
fundamental facts that govern the world by constraining its physical
possibilities. I examine three hallmarks of laws--simplicity, exactness, and
objectivity--and discuss whether and how they may be associated with laws of
physics.
Related papers
- Compositional Law Parsing with Latent Random Functions [54.26307134687171]
We propose a deep latent variable model for Compositional LAw Parsing (CLAP)
CLAP achieves the human-like compositionality ability through an encoding-decoding architecture to represent concepts in the scene as latent variables.
Our experimental results demonstrate that CLAP outperforms the compared baseline methods in multiple visual tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-15T06:57:23Z) - How John Wheeler lost his faith in the law [77.34726150561087]
We investigate how Wheeler reached the conclusion that gravitational collapse calls into question the lawfulness of physics.
We show how Wheeler tried to develop a new worldview, rethinking in his own way the lessons of quantum mechanics as well as drawing inspiration from other disciplines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-29T14:10:23Z) - Strong Determinism [0.0]
A strongly deterministic theory of physics permits exactly one possible history of the universe.
A surprising consequence is that whether or not our world is strongly deterministic may be empirically underdetermined.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-06T06:13:04Z) - No second law of entanglement manipulation after all [8.37609145576126]
A long-standing open problem has been to establish a true second law of entanglement.
We show that this is impossible, and no direct counterpart to the second law of thermodynamics can be established.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-03T18:00:46Z) - The Cosmic Void [0.0]
Non-fundamental facts are explained by facts about fundamental matter.
In this paper, I introduce a non-standard picture called the "cosmic void" in which the universe is devoid of any fundamental material.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-22T15:48:24Z) - Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory.
We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z) - Governing Without A Fundamental Direction of Time: Minimal Primitivism
about Laws of Nature [0.0]
The Great Divide in metaphysical debates about laws of nature is between Humeans and non-Humeans.
We propose a minimal primitivism about laws of nature according to which there is no such requirement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-19T21:09:39Z) - Are quantum cryptographic security claims vacuous? [12.970250708769708]
We explain why Bernstein's reasoning is based on a too "classical" understanding of physics.
It follows from known theorems about fault-tolerant quantum computation that quantum physics avoids his conclusion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-22T18:00:05Z) - Undecidability and unpredictability: not limitations, but triumphs of
science [0.0]
It is a widespread belief that results like G"odel's incompleteness theorems represent fundamental limitations to humanity's strive for scientific knowledge.
I argue that this view is wrong. It originates in a naive form of metaphysics that sees the physical and Platonic worlds as a collection of things with definite properties.
I argue to replace this perspective by a worldview in which a structural notion of real patterns', not things' are regarded as fundamental.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-22T12:08:06Z) - Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements.
As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z) - Fundamental Nomic Vagueness [0.0]
I characterize fundamental nomic vagueness as the existence of borderline lawful worlds.
I suggest that such vagueness can be regarded as 'vagueness in the world'
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-08T01:41:43Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.