Governing Without A Fundamental Direction of Time: Minimal Primitivism about Laws of Nature

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.09226v2
• Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 00:17:46 GMT
• Title: Governing Without A Fundamental Direction of Time: Minimal Primitivism about Laws of Nature
• Authors: Eddy Keming Chen and Sheldon Goldstein
• Abstract summary: The Great Divide in metaphysical debates about laws of nature is between Humeans and non-Humeans. We propose a minimal primitivism about laws of nature according to which there is no such requirement.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The Great Divide in metaphysical debates about laws of nature is between Humeans, who think that laws merely describe the distribution of matter, and non-Humeans, who think that laws govern it. The metaphysics can place demands on the proper formulations of physical theories. It is sometimes assumed that the governing view requires a fundamental / intrinsic direction of time: to govern, laws must be dynamical, producing later states of the world from earlier ones, in accord with the fundamental direction of time in the universe. In this paper, we propose a minimal primitivism about laws of nature (MinP) according to which there is no such requirement. On our view, laws govern by constraining the physical possibilities. Our view captures the essence of the governing view without taking on extraneous commitments about the direction of time or dynamic production. Moreover, as a version of primitivism, our view requires no reduction / analysis of laws in terms of universals, powers, or dispositions. Our view accommodates several potential candidates for fundamental laws, including the principle of least action, the Past Hypothesis, the Einstein equation of general relativity, and even controversial examples found in the Wheeler-Feynman theory of electrodynamics and retrocausal theories of quantum mechanics. By understanding governing as constraining, non-Humeans who accept MinP have the same freedom to contemplate a wide variety of candidate fundamental laws as Humeans do.

Related papers

• Relaxation of first-class constraints and the quantization of gauge theories: from "matter without matter" to the reappearance of time in quantum gravity [72.27323884094953]
  We make a conceptual overview of an approach to the initial-value problem in canonical gauge theories. We stress how the first-class phase-space constraints may be relaxed if we interpret them as fixing the values of new degrees of freedom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T19:00:02Z)
• Laws of Physics [0.0]
  Despite its apparent complexity, our world seems to be governed by simple laws of physics. I suggest that laws are fundamental facts that govern the world by constraining its physical possibilities. I examine three hallmarks of laws--simplicity, exactness, and objectivity--and discuss whether and how they may be associated with laws of physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-07T05:22:24Z)
• No second law of entanglement manipulation after all [8.37609145576126]
  A long-standing open problem has been to establish a true second law of entanglement. We show that this is impossible, and no direct counterpart to the second law of thermodynamics can be established.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T18:00:46Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Testing quantum theory with thought experiments [4.847980206213335]
  How should one model systems that include agents who are themselves using quantum theory? We give a state-of-the-art overview on quantum thought experiments involving observers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T18:08:23Z)
• Gentle Measurement as a Principle of Quantum Theory [9.137554315375919]
  We propose the gentle measurement principle (GMP) as one of the principles at the foundation of quantum mechanics. We show, within the framework of general probabilistic theories, that GMP imposes strong restrictions on the law of physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-28T11:59:49Z)
• The Past Hypothesis and the Nature of Physical Laws [0.0]
  I examine the role of the Past Hypothesis in the Boltzmannian account. I defend the view that the Past Hypothesis is a candidate fundamental law of nature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-03T02:18:48Z)
• Measuring Quantum Superpositions (Or, "It is only the theory which decides what can be observed.") [0.0]
  We argue that the ad hoc introduction of the projection postulate (or measurement rule) can be understood as a necessary requirement coming from a naive empiricist standpoint. We discuss the general physical conditions for measuring and observing quantum superpositions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-02T14:30:56Z)
• There is only one time [110.83289076967895]
  We draw a picture of physical systems that allows us to recognize what is this thing called "time" We derive the Schr"odinger equation in the first case, and the Hamilton equations of motion in the second one.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T09:54:46Z)
• Fundamental Nomic Vagueness [0.0]
  I characterize fundamental nomic vagueness as the existence of borderline lawful worlds. I suggest that such vagueness can be regarded as 'vagueness in the world'
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T01:41:43Z)
• Precision Gravity Tests and the Einstein Equivalence Principle [0.0]
  General Relativity is today the best theory of gravity addressing a wide range of phenomena. The Equivalence Principle represents the core of the Einstein theory of gravity. Recent progress on relativistic theories of gravity have to take into account new issues like Dark Matter and Dark Energy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-07T17:05:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.