Related papers: Fundamental Nomic Vagueness

Fundamental Nomic Vagueness

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.05298v2
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 04:12:28 GMT
Title: Fundamental Nomic Vagueness
Authors: Eddy Keming Chen
Abstract summary: I characterize fundamental nomic vagueness as the existence of borderline lawful worlds. I suggest that such vagueness can be regarded as 'vagueness in the world'
Score: 0.0
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Abstract: If there are fundamental laws of nature, can they fail to be exact? In this paper, I consider the possibility that some fundamental laws are vague. I call this phenomenon 'fundamental nomic vagueness.' I characterize fundamental nomic vagueness as the existence of borderline lawful worlds and the presence of several other accompanying features. Under certain assumptions, such vagueness prevents the fundamental physical theory from being completely expressible in the mathematical language. Moreover, I suggest that such vagueness can be regarded as 'vagueness in the world.' For a case study, we turn to the Past Hypothesis, a postulate that (partially) explains the direction of time in our world. We have reasons to take it seriously as a candidate fundamental law of nature. Yet it is vague: it admits borderline (nomologically) possible worlds. An exact version would lead to an untraceable arbitrariness absent in any other fundamental laws. However, the dilemma between fundamental nomic vagueness and untraceable arbitrariness is dissolved in a new quantum theory of time's arrow.

Related papers

Betting on what is neither verifiable nor falsifiable [18.688474183114085]
We propose an approach to betting on such events via options, or equivalently as bets on the outcome of a "verification-falsification game" Our work thus acts as an alternative to the existing framework of Garrabrant induction for logical uncertainty, and relates to the stance known as constructivism in the philosophy of mathematics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T17:30:34Z)
Laws of Physics [0.0]
Despite its apparent complexity, our world seems to be governed by simple laws of physics. I suggest that laws are fundamental facts that govern the world by constraining its physical possibilities. I examine three hallmarks of laws--simplicity, exactness, and objectivity--and discuss whether and how they may be associated with laws of physics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-07T05:22:24Z)
Strong Determinism [0.0]
A strongly deterministic theory of physics permits exactly one possible history of the universe. A surprising consequence is that whether or not our world is strongly deterministic may be empirically underdetermined.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-06T06:13:04Z)
The Cosmic Void [0.0]
Non-fundamental facts are explained by facts about fundamental matter. In this paper, I introduce a non-standard picture called the "cosmic void" in which the universe is devoid of any fundamental material.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-22T15:48:24Z)
Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
Governing Without A Fundamental Direction of Time: Minimal Primitivism about Laws of Nature [0.0]
The Great Divide in metaphysical debates about laws of nature is between Humeans and non-Humeans. We propose a minimal primitivism about laws of nature according to which there is no such requirement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-19T21:09:39Z)
Uncertainty measures: The big picture [7.655239948659381]
We show that a wide array of theories of uncertainty have been proposed, many of them generalisations of classical probability. Our goal is a critical appraisal of the current landscape in uncertainty theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-14T13:11:20Z)
Gentle Measurement as a Principle of Quantum Theory [9.137554315375919]
We propose the gentle measurement principle (GMP) as one of the principles at the foundation of quantum mechanics. We show, within the framework of general probabilistic theories, that GMP imposes strong restrictions on the law of physics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-28T11:59:49Z)
Impossibility of creating a superposition of unknown quantum states [16.467540842571328]
We show that the existence of a protocol that superposes two unknown pure states with nonzero probability leads to violation of other no-go theorems. Such a protocol can be used to perform certain state discrimination and cloning tasks that are forbidden in quantum theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-04T13:25:42Z)
Undecidability and unpredictability: not limitations, but triumphs of science [0.0]
It is a widespread belief that results like G"odel's incompleteness theorems represent fundamental limitations to humanity's strive for scientific knowledge. I argue that this view is wrong. It originates in a naive form of metaphysics that sees the physical and Platonic worlds as a collection of things with definite properties. I argue to replace this perspective by a worldview in which a structural notion of real patterns', not things' are regarded as fundamental.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-22T12:08:06Z)
Exploiting Game Theory for Analysing Justifications [13.72913891724593]
We continue the study of justification theory by means of three major contributions. The first is studying the relation between justification theory and game theory. The second contribution is studying under which condition two different dialects of justification theory coincide. The third contribution is establishing a precise criterion of when a semantics induced by justification theory yields consistent results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-04T14:45:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.