Locating Buggy Segments in Quantum Program Debugging

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.04266v3
• Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 03:27:24 GMT
• Title: Locating Buggy Segments in Quantum Program Debugging
• Abstract summary: The cost of testing each segment depends on its location. Since a quantum program is tested statistically on the basis of measurement results, there is a tradeoff between testing accuracy and cost. We propose a bug-locating method that takes these characteristics into account.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: When a bug is detected by testing a quantum program on a quantum computer, we want to determine its location to fix it. To locate the bug, the quantum program is divided into several segments, and each segment is tested. However, to prepare a quantum state that is input to a segment, it is necessary to execute all the segments ahead of that segment in a quantum computer. This means that the cost of testing each segment depends on its location. We can also locate a buggy segment only if it is confirmed that there are no bugs in all segments ahead of that buggy segment. Since a quantum program is tested statistically on the basis of measurement results, there is a tradeoff between testing accuracy and cost. Although these characteristics are unique to quantum programs and complicate locating bugs, they have not been investigated. We suggest for the first time that these characteristics should be considered to efficiently locate bugs. We are also the first to propose a bug-locating method that takes these characteristics into account. The results from experiments indicate that the bug-locating cost, represented as the number of executed quantum gates, can be reduced with the proposed method compared with naive methods.

Related papers

• An experience-based classification of quantum bugs in quantum software [0.34376560669160394]
  We describe a set of 14 quantum bugs, sourced primarily from our experience as quantum software developers.<n>We detail their context, symptoms, and the techniques applied to identify and fix them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T12:58:22Z)
• Bug-locating Method based on Statistical Testing for Quantum Programs [0.0]
  The cost of testing each segment depends on its location. Since a quantum program is tested statistically on the basis of measurement results, there is a tradeoff between testing accuracy and cost. We propose an efficient bug-locating method consisting of four approaches, cost-based binary search, early determination, finalization, and looking back.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T07:14:08Z)
• Analyzing Quantum Programs with LintQ: A Static Analysis Framework for Qiskit [21.351834312054844]
  This paper presents LintQ, a comprehensive static analysis framework for detecting bugs in quantum programs. Our approach is enabled by a set of abstractions designed to reason about common concepts in quantum computing without referring to the underlying quantum computing platform. We apply the approach to a newly collected dataset of 7,568 real-world Qiskit-based quantum programs, showing that LintQ effectively identifies various programming problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T16:36:09Z)
• quAssert: Automatic Generation of Quantum Assertions [5.263910852465185]
  We propose automated generation and placement of quantum assertions based on static analysis and random sampling of quantum circuits. We uncover special properties of a quantum circuit, such as purely classical states, superposition states, and entangled states using statistical methods. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the generated assertions in error detection using a suite of quantum benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T18:49:14Z)
• Simple Tests of Quantumness Also Certify Qubits [69.96668065491183]
  A test of quantumness is a protocol that allows a classical verifier to certify (only) that a prover is not classical. We show that tests of quantumness that follow a certain template, which captures recent proposals such as (Kalai et al., 2022) can in fact do much more. Namely, the same protocols can be used for certifying a qubit, a building-block that stands at the heart of applications such as certifiable randomness and classical delegation of quantum computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T14:18:17Z)
• Validation tests of GBS quantum computers give evidence for quantum advantage with a decoherent target [62.997667081978825]
  We use positive-P phase-space simulations of grouped count probabilities as a fingerprint for verifying multi-mode data. We show how one can disprove faked data, and apply this to a classical count algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T12:00:45Z)
• Testing quantum computers with the protocol of quantum state matching [0.0]
  The presence of noise in quantum computers hinders their effective operation. We suggest the application of the so-called quantum state matching protocol for testing purposes. For systematically varied inputs we find that the device with the smaller quantum volume performs better on our tests than the one with larger quantum volume.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T08:25:34Z)
• Iterative Qubits Management for Quantum Index Searching in a Hybrid System [56.39703478198019]
  IQuCS aims at index searching and counting in a quantum-classical hybrid system. We implement IQuCS with Qiskit and conduct intensive experiments. Results demonstrate that it reduces qubits consumption by up to 66.2%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-22T21:54:28Z)
• Efficient Bipartite Entanglement Detection Scheme with a Quantum Adversarial Solver [89.80359585967642]
  Proposal reformulates the bipartite entanglement detection as a two-player zero-sum game completed by parameterized quantum circuits. We experimentally implement our protocol on a linear optical network and exhibit its effectiveness to accomplish the bipartite entanglement detection for 5-qubit quantum pure states and 2-qubit quantum mixed states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T09:46:45Z)
• A Comprehensive Study of Bug Fixes in Quantum Programs [2.4210353446643804]
  We collect and investigate 96 real-world bugs and their fixes from four popular quantum programming languages Qiskit, Cirq, Q#, and ProjectQ. Our study shows that a high proportion of bugs in quantum programs are quantum-specific bugs (over 80%), which requires further research in the bug fixing domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-21T12:14:42Z)
• Measuring NISQ Gate-Based Qubit Stability Using a 1+1 Field Theory and Cycle Benchmarking [50.8020641352841]
  We study coherent errors on a quantum hardware platform using a transverse field Ising model Hamiltonian as a sample user application. We identify inter-day and intra-day qubit calibration drift and the impacts of quantum circuit placement on groups of qubits in different physical locations on the processor. This paper also discusses how these measurements can provide a better understanding of these types of errors and how they may improve efforts to validate the accuracy of quantum computations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-08T23:12:55Z)
• Experimental violations of Leggett-Garg's inequalities on a quantum computer [77.34726150561087]
  We experimentally observe the violations of Leggett-Garg-Bell's inequalities on single and multi-qubit systems. Our analysis highlights the limits of nowadays quantum platforms, showing that the above-mentioned correlation functions deviate from theoretical prediction as the number of qubits and the depth of the circuit grow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T14:35:15Z)
• Deterministic correction of qubit loss [48.43720700248091]
  Loss of qubits poses one of the fundamental obstacles towards large-scale and fault-tolerant quantum information processors. We experimentally demonstrate the implementation of a full cycle of qubit loss detection and correction on a minimal instance of a topological surface code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-21T19:48:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.