Creating a Systematic ESG (Environmental Social Governance) Scoring System Using Social Network Analysis and Machine Learning for More Sustainable Company Practices

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.05607v1
• Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 20:03:45 GMT
• Title: Creating a Systematic ESG (Environmental Social Governance) Scoring System Using Social Network Analysis and Machine Learning for More Sustainable Company Practices
• Authors: Aarav Patel, Peter Gloor
• Abstract summary: This project aims to create a data-driven ESG evaluation system that can provide better guidance and more systemized scores by incorporating social sentiment. Python web scrapers were developed to collect data from Wikipedia, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Google News for the S&P 500 companies. Machine-learning algorithms were trained and calibrated to S&P Global ESG Ratings to test their predictive capabilities.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Environmental Social Governance (ESG) is a widely used metric that measures the sustainability of a company practices. Currently, ESG is determined using self-reported corporate filings, which allows companies to portray themselves in an artificially positive light. As a result, ESG evaluation is subjective and inconsistent across raters, giving executives mixed signals on what to improve. This project aims to create a data-driven ESG evaluation system that can provide better guidance and more systemized scores by incorporating social sentiment. Social sentiment allows for more balanced perspectives which directly highlight public opinion, helping companies create more focused and impactful initiatives. To build this, Python web scrapers were developed to collect data from Wikipedia, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Google News for the S&P 500 companies. Data was then cleaned and passed through NLP algorithms to obtain sentiment scores for ESG subcategories. Using these features, machine-learning algorithms were trained and calibrated to S&P Global ESG Ratings to test their predictive capabilities. The Random-Forest model was the strongest model with a mean absolute error of 13.4% and a correlation of 26.1% (p-value 0.0372), showing encouraging results. Overall, measuring ESG social sentiment across sub-categories can help executives focus efforts on areas people care about most. Furthermore, this data-driven methodology can provide ratings for companies without coverage, allowing more socially responsible firms to thrive.

Related papers

• Balancing User Preferences by Social Networks: A Condition-Guided Social Recommendation Model for Mitigating Popularity Bias [64.73474454254105]
  Social recommendation models weave social interactions into their design to provide uniquely personalized recommendation results for users. Existing social recommendation models fail to address the issues of popularity bias and the redundancy of social information. We propose a Condition-Guided Social Recommendation Model (named CGSoRec) to mitigate the model's popularity bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T02:45:01Z)
• ESG Sentiment Analysis: comparing human and language model performance including GPT [0.0]
  ESG has grown in importance in recent years with a surge in interest from the financial sector. The use of sentiment analysis to measure ESG related reputation has developed and with it interest in the use of machines to do so. Our study seeks to compare human performance with the cutting edge in machine performance in the measurement of ESG related sentiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T15:22:30Z)
• ESGReveal: An LLM-based approach for extracting structured data from ESG reports [5.467389155759699]
  ESGReveal is an innovative method proposed for efficiently extracting and analyzing Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) data from corporate reports. This approach utilizes Large Language Models (LLM) enhanced with Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques. Its efficacy was appraised using ESG reports from 166 companies across various sectors listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in 2022.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-25T06:44:32Z)
• Glitter or Gold? Deriving Structured Insights from Sustainability Reports via Large Language Models [16.231171704561714]
  This study uses Information Extraction (IE) methods to extract structured insights related to ESG aspects from companies' sustainability reports. We then leverage graph-based representations to conduct statistical analyses concerning the extracted insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T11:34:41Z)
• Harnessing the Web and Knowledge Graphs for Automated Impact Investing Scoring [2.4107880640624706]
  We describe a data-driven system that seeks to automate the process of creating an Sustainable Development Goals framework. We propose a novel method for collecting and filtering a dataset of texts from different web sources and a knowledge graph relevant to a set of companies. Our results indicate that our best performing model can accurately predict SDG scores with a micro average F1 score of 0.89.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-04T15:14:16Z)
• Ecosystem Graphs: The Social Footprint of Foundation Models [64.02855828418608]
  We propose Ecosystem Graphs as a documentation framework to transparently centralize knowledge of this ecosystem. Ecosystem Graphs is composed of assets (datasets, models, applications) linked together by dependencies that indicate technical (e.g. how Bing relies on GPT-4) and social (e.g. how Microsoft relies on OpenAI) relationships.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T07:18:29Z)
• Predicting Companies' ESG Ratings from News Articles Using Multivariate Timeseries Analysis [17.332692582748408]
  We build a model to predict ESG ratings from news articles using the combination of multivariate timeseries construction and deep learning techniques. A news dataset for about 3,000 US companies together with their ratings is also created and released for training. Our approach provides accurate results outperforming the state-of-the-art, and can be used in practice to support a manual determination or analysis of ESG ratings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-13T11:23:02Z)
• Ranking-based Group Identification via Factorized Attention on Social Tripartite Graph [68.08590487960475]
  We propose a novel GNN-based framework named Contextualized Factorized Attention for Group identification (CFAG) We devise tripartite graph convolution layers to aggregate information from different types of neighborhoods among users, groups, and items. To cope with the data sparsity issue, we devise a novel propagation augmentation layer, which is based on our proposed factorized attention mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-02T01:42:20Z)
• Using Sampling to Estimate and Improve Performance of Automated Scoring Systems with Guarantees [63.62448343531963]
  We propose a combination of the existing paradigms, sampling responses to be scored by humans intelligently. We observe significant gains in accuracy (19.80% increase on average) and quadratic weighted kappa (QWK) (25.60% on average) with a relatively small human budget.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-17T05:00:51Z)
• SustainBench: Benchmarks for Monitoring the Sustainable Development Goals with Machine Learning [63.192289553021816]
  Progress toward the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals has been hindered by a lack of data on key environmental and socioeconomic indicators. Recent advances in machine learning have made it possible to utilize abundant, frequently-updated, and globally available data, such as from satellites or social media. In this paper, we introduce SustainBench, a collection of 15 benchmark tasks across 7 SDGs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-08T18:59:04Z)
• Benchmarking Graph Neural Networks [75.42159546060509]
  Graph neural networks (GNNs) have become the standard toolkit for analyzing and learning from data on graphs. For any successful field to become mainstream and reliable, benchmarks must be developed to quantify progress. GitHub repository has reached 1,800 stars and 339 forks, which demonstrates the utility of the proposed open-source framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T15:58:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.