Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Dialogue Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.06490v1
• Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 18:03:55 GMT
• Title: Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Dialogue Analysis
• Authors: Sarah E. Finch, Ellie S. Paek, Jinho D. Choi
• Abstract summary: This paper investigates the ability of a state-of-the-art large language model (LLM), ChatGPT-3.5, to perform dialogue behavior detection for nine categories in real human-bot dialogues. Our findings reveal that neither specialized models nor ChatGPT have yet achieved satisfactory results for this task, falling short of human performance.
• Score: 12.116834890063146
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Developing high-performing dialogue systems benefits from the automatic identification of undesirable behaviors in system responses. However, detecting such behaviors remains challenging, as it draws on a breadth of general knowledge and understanding of conversational practices. Although recent research has focused on building specialized classifiers for detecting specific dialogue behaviors, the behavior coverage is still incomplete and there is a lack of testing on real-world human-bot interactions. This paper investigates the ability of a state-of-the-art large language model (LLM), ChatGPT-3.5, to perform dialogue behavior detection for nine categories in real human-bot dialogues. We aim to assess whether ChatGPT can match specialized models and approximate human performance, thereby reducing the cost of behavior detection tasks. Our findings reveal that neither specialized models nor ChatGPT have yet achieved satisfactory results for this task, falling short of human performance. Nevertheless, ChatGPT shows promising potential and often outperforms specialized detection models. We conclude with an in-depth examination of the prevalent shortcomings of ChatGPT, offering guidance for future research to enhance LLM capabilities.

Related papers

• A Linguistic Comparison between Human and ChatGPT-Generated Conversations [9.022590646680095]
  The research employs Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count analysis, comparing ChatGPT-generated conversations with human conversations. Results show greater variability and authenticity in human dialogues, but ChatGPT excels in categories such as social processes, analytical style, cognition, attentional focus, and positive emotional tone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T21:43:27Z)
• Can You Follow Me? Testing Situational Understanding in ChatGPT [17.52769657390388]
  "situational understanding" (SU) is a critical ability for human-like AI agents. We propose a novel synthetic environment for SU testing in chat-oriented models. We find that despite the fundamental simplicity of the task, the model's performance reflects an inability to retain correct environment states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T19:22:01Z)
• Is ChatGPT Equipped with Emotional Dialogue Capabilities? [14.419588510681773]
  The study evaluates the performance of ChatGPT on emotional dialogue understanding and generation through a series of experiments on several downstream tasks. Our findings indicate that while ChatGPT's performance on emotional dialogue understanding may still lag behind that of supervised models, it exhibits promising results in generating emotional responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T11:42:40Z)
• A Preliminary Evaluation of ChatGPT for Zero-shot Dialogue Understanding [55.37338324658501]
  Zero-shot dialogue understanding aims to enable dialogue to track the user's needs without any training data. In this work, we investigate the understanding ability of ChatGPT for zero-shot dialogue understanding tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-09T15:28:36Z)
• To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: That is the question! [78.407861566006]
  This study provides a comprehensive and contemporary assessment of the most recent techniques in ChatGPT detection. We have curated a benchmark dataset consisting of prompts from ChatGPT and humans, including diverse questions from medical, open Q&A, and finance domains. Our evaluation results demonstrate that none of the existing methods can effectively detect ChatGPT-generated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T03:04:28Z)
• On the Robustness of ChatGPT: An Adversarial and Out-of-distribution Perspective [67.98821225810204]
  We evaluate the robustness of ChatGPT from the adversarial and out-of-distribution perspective. Results show consistent advantages on most adversarial and OOD classification and translation tasks. ChatGPT shows astounding performance in understanding dialogue-related texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T11:01:20Z)
• ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of none [4.693597927153063]
  OpenAI has released the Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) We examined ChatGPT's capabilities on 25 diverse analytical NLP tasks. We automated ChatGPT and GPT-4 prompting process and analyzed more than 49k responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-21T15:20:37Z)
• Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver? [113.22611481694825]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to perform a variety of natural language processing (NLP) tasks zero-shot. Recently, the debut of ChatGPT has drawn a great deal of attention from the natural language processing (NLP) community. It is not yet known whether ChatGPT can serve as a generalist model that can perform many NLP tasks zero-shot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T09:44:51Z)
• A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures [47.64219291655723]
  ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, has been trained using massive amounts of data and simulates human conversation. It has garnered significant attention due to its ability to effectively answer a broad range of human inquiries. However, a comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's failures is lacking, which is the focus of this study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T04:21:59Z)
• TOD-BERT: Pre-trained Natural Language Understanding for Task-Oriented Dialogue [113.45485470103762]
  In this work, we unify nine human-human and multi-turn task-oriented dialogue datasets for language modeling. To better model dialogue behavior during pre-training, we incorporate user and system tokens into the masked language modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T04:09:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.