Is ChatGPT Equipped with Emotional Dialogue Capabilities?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.09582v1
• Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 11:42:40 GMT
• Title: Is ChatGPT Equipped with Emotional Dialogue Capabilities?
• Authors: Weixiang Zhao, Yanyan Zhao, Xin Lu, Shilong Wang, Yanpeng Tong, Bing Qin
• Abstract summary: The study evaluates the performance of ChatGPT on emotional dialogue understanding and generation through a series of experiments on several downstream tasks. Our findings indicate that while ChatGPT's performance on emotional dialogue understanding may still lag behind that of supervised models, it exhibits promising results in generating emotional responses.
• Score: 14.419588510681773
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This report presents a study on the emotional dialogue capability of ChatGPT, an advanced language model developed by OpenAI. The study evaluates the performance of ChatGPT on emotional dialogue understanding and generation through a series of experiments on several downstream tasks. Our findings indicate that while ChatGPT's performance on emotional dialogue understanding may still lag behind that of supervised models, it exhibits promising results in generating emotional responses. Furthermore, the study suggests potential avenues for future research directions.

Related papers

• ChatGPT in Research and Education: Exploring Benefits and Threats [1.9466452723529557]
  ChatGPT is a powerful language model developed by OpenAI. It offers personalized feedback, enhances accessibility, enables interactive conversations, assists with lesson preparation and evaluation, and introduces new methods for teaching complex subjects. ChatGPT also poses challenges to traditional education and research systems. These challenges include the risk of cheating on online exams, the generation of human-like text that may compromise academic integrity, and difficulties in assessing the reliability of information generated by AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T05:29:00Z)
• The Future of Learning: Large Language Models through the Lens of Students [20.64319102112755]
  Students grapple with the dilemma of utilizing ChatGPT's efficiency for learning and information seeking. Students perceive ChatGPT as being more "human-like" compared to traditional AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T16:40:37Z)
• ECR-Chain: Advancing Generative Language Models to Better Emotion-Cause Reasoners through Reasoning Chains [61.50113532215864]
  Causal Emotion Entailment (CEE) aims to identify the causal utterances in a conversation that stimulate the emotions expressed in a target utterance. Current works in CEE mainly focus on modeling semantic and emotional interactions in conversations. We introduce a step-by-step reasoning method, Emotion-Cause Reasoning Chain (ECR-Chain), to infer the stimulus from the target emotional expressions in conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T15:45:08Z)
• A Linguistic Comparison between Human and ChatGPT-Generated Conversations [9.022590646680095]
  The research employs Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count analysis, comparing ChatGPT-generated conversations with human conversations. Results show greater variability and authenticity in human dialogues, but ChatGPT excels in categories such as social processes, analytical style, cognition, attentional focus, and positive emotional tone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T21:43:27Z)
• Exploring ChatGPT's Capabilities on Vulnerability Management [56.4403395100589]
  We explore ChatGPT's capabilities on 6 tasks involving the complete vulnerability management process with a large-scale dataset containing 70,346 samples. One notable example is ChatGPT's proficiency in tasks like generating titles for software bug reports. Our findings reveal the difficulties encountered by ChatGPT and shed light on promising future directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-11T11:01:13Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Dialogue Analysis [12.116834890063146]
  This paper investigates the ability of a state-of-the-art large language model (LLM), ChatGPT-3.5, to perform dialogue behavior detection for nine categories in real human-bot dialogues. Our findings reveal that neither specialized models nor ChatGPT have yet achieved satisfactory results for this task, falling short of human performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-12T18:03:55Z)
• Uncovering the Potential of ChatGPT for Discourse Analysis in Dialogue: An Empirical Study [51.079100495163736]
  This paper systematically inspects ChatGPT's performance in two discourse analysis tasks: topic segmentation and discourse parsing. ChatGPT demonstrates proficiency in identifying topic structures in general-domain conversations yet struggles considerably in specific-domain conversations. Our deeper investigation indicates that ChatGPT can give more reasonable topic structures than human annotations but only linearly parses the hierarchical rhetorical structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T07:14:41Z)
• A Preliminary Evaluation of ChatGPT for Zero-shot Dialogue Understanding [55.37338324658501]
  Zero-shot dialogue understanding aims to enable dialogue to track the user's needs without any training data. In this work, we investigate the understanding ability of ChatGPT for zero-shot dialogue understanding tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-09T15:28:36Z)
• Is ChatGPT A Good Keyphrase Generator? A Preliminary Study [51.863368917344864]
  ChatGPT has recently garnered significant attention from the computational linguistics community. We evaluate its performance in various aspects, including keyphrase generation prompts, keyphrase generation diversity, and long document understanding. We find that ChatGPT performs exceptionally well on all six candidate prompts, with minor performance differences observed across the datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-23T02:50:38Z)
• Can ChatGPT Understand Too? A Comparative Study on ChatGPT and Fine-tuned BERT [103.57103957631067]
  ChatGPT has attracted great attention, as it can generate fluent and high-quality responses to human inquiries. We evaluate ChatGPT's understanding ability by evaluating it on the most popular GLUE benchmark, and comparing it with 4 representative fine-tuned BERT-style models. We find that: 1) ChatGPT falls short in handling paraphrase and similarity tasks; 2) ChatGPT outperforms all BERT models on inference tasks by a large margin; 3) ChatGPT achieves comparable performance compared with BERT on sentiment analysis and question answering tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-19T12:29:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.