Mitigating Group Bias in Federated Learning for Heterogeneous Devices

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.07085v2
• Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 18:25:51 GMT
• Title: Mitigating Group Bias in Federated Learning for Heterogeneous Devices
• Authors: Khotso Selialia, Yasra Chandio, Fatima M. Anwar,
• Abstract summary: Federated Learning is emerging as a privacy-preserving model training approach in distributed edge applications. Our work proposes a group-fair FL framework that minimizes group-bias while preserving privacy and without resource utilization overhead.
• Score: 1.181206257787103
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Federated Learning is emerging as a privacy-preserving model training approach in distributed edge applications. As such, most edge deployments are heterogeneous in nature i.e., their sensing capabilities and environments vary across deployments. This edge heterogeneity violates the independence and identical distribution (IID) property of local data across clients and produces biased global models i.e. models that contribute to unfair decision-making and discrimination against a particular community or a group. Existing bias mitigation techniques only focus on bias generated from label heterogeneity in non-IID data without accounting for domain variations due to feature heterogeneity and do not address global group-fairness property. Our work proposes a group-fair FL framework that minimizes group-bias while preserving privacy and without resource utilization overhead. Our main idea is to leverage average conditional probabilities to compute a cross-domain group \textit{importance weights} derived from heterogeneous training data to optimize the performance of the worst-performing group using a modified multiplicative weights update method. Additionally, we propose regularization techniques to minimize the difference between the worst and best-performing groups while making sure through our thresholding mechanism to strike a balance between bias reduction and group performance degradation. Our evaluation of human emotion recognition and image classification benchmarks assesses the fair decision-making of our framework in real-world heterogeneous settings.

Related papers

• Trained Models Tell Us How to Make Them Robust to Spurious Correlation without Group Annotation [3.894771553698554]
  Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) models tend to rely on attributes that have high spurious correlation with the target. This can degrade the performance on underrepresented (or'minority') groups that lack these attributes. We propose Environment-based Validation and Loss-based Sampling (EVaLS) to enhance robustness to spurious correlation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T08:17:44Z)
• Addressing Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning with Adaptive Normalization-Free Feature Recalibration [1.33512912917221]
  Federated learning is a decentralized collaborative training paradigm that preserves stakeholders' data ownership while improving performance and generalization. We propose Adaptive Normalization-free Feature Recalibration (ANFR), an architecture-level approach that combines weight standardization and channel attention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T20:16:56Z)
• Federated Fairness without Access to Sensitive Groups [12.888927461513472]
  Current approaches to group fairness in federated learning assume the existence of predefined and labeled sensitive groups during training. We propose a new approach to guarantee group fairness that does not rely on any predefined definition of sensitive groups or additional labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T19:24:59Z)
• Federated Two Stage Decoupling With Adaptive Personalization Layers [5.69361786082969]
  Federated learning has gained significant attention due to its ability to enable distributed learning while maintaining privacy constraints. It inherently experiences significant learning degradation and slow convergence speed. It is natural to employ the concept of clustering homogeneous clients into the same group, allowing only the model weights within each group to be aggregated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-30T07:46:32Z)
• Modeling the Q-Diversity in a Min-max Play Game for Robust Optimization [61.39201891894024]
  Group distributionally robust optimization (group DRO) can minimize the worst-case loss over pre-defined groups. We reformulate the group DRO framework by proposing Q-Diversity. Characterized by an interactive training mode, Q-Diversity relaxes the group identification from annotation into direct parameterization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-20T07:02:27Z)
• Generative Model Based Noise Robust Training for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation [108.11783463263328]
  This paper proposes a Generative model-based Noise-Robust Training method (GeNRT) It eliminates domain shift while mitigating label noise. Experiments on Office-Home, PACS, and Digit-Five show that our GeNRT achieves comparable performance to state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-10T06:43:55Z)
• Divide and Contrast: Source-free Domain Adaptation via Adaptive Contrastive Learning [122.62311703151215]
  Divide and Contrast (DaC) aims to connect the good ends of both worlds while bypassing their limitations. DaC divides the target data into source-like and target-specific samples, where either group of samples is treated with tailored goals. We further align the source-like domain with the target-specific samples using a memory bank-based Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) loss to reduce the distribution mismatch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-12T09:21:49Z)
• Rethinking Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning: Introducing a New Notion and Standard Benchmarks [65.34113135080105]
  We show that not only the issue of data heterogeneity in current setups is not necessarily a problem but also in fact it can be beneficial for the FL participants. Our observations are intuitive. Our code is available at https://github.com/MMorafah/FL-SC-NIID.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T17:15:19Z)
• Fed-CBS: A Heterogeneity-Aware Client Sampling Mechanism for Federated Learning via Class-Imbalance Reduction [76.26710990597498]
  We show that the class-imbalance of the grouped data from randomly selected clients can lead to significant performance degradation. Based on our key observation, we design an efficient client sampling mechanism, i.e., Federated Class-balanced Sampling (Fed-CBS) In particular, we propose a measure of class-imbalance and then employ homomorphic encryption to derive this measure in a privacy-preserving way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T05:42:56Z)
• Examining and Combating Spurious Features under Distribution Shift [94.31956965507085]
  We define and analyze robust and spurious representations using the information-theoretic concept of minimal sufficient statistics. We prove that even when there is only bias of the input distribution, models can still pick up spurious features from their training data. Inspired by our analysis, we demonstrate that group DRO can fail when groups do not directly account for various spurious correlations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T05:39:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.