Data Augmentation via Subgroup Mixup for Improving Fairness
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.07110v1
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 17:32:21 GMT
- Title: Data Augmentation via Subgroup Mixup for Improving Fairness
- Authors: Madeline Navarro, Camille Little, Genevera I. Allen, Santiago Segarra
- Abstract summary: We propose data augmentation via pairwise mixup across subgroups to improve group fairness.
Inspired by the successes of mixup for improving classification performance, we develop a pairwise mixup scheme to augment training data.
- Score: 31.296907816698987
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In this work, we propose data augmentation via pairwise mixup across
subgroups to improve group fairness. Many real-world applications of machine
learning systems exhibit biases across certain groups due to
under-representation or training data that reflects societal biases. Inspired
by the successes of mixup for improving classification performance, we develop
a pairwise mixup scheme to augment training data and encourage fair and
accurate decision boundaries for all subgroups. Data augmentation for group
fairness allows us to add new samples of underrepresented groups to balance
subpopulations. Furthermore, our method allows us to use the generalization
ability of mixup to improve both fairness and accuracy. We compare our proposed
mixup to existing data augmentation and bias mitigation approaches on both
synthetic simulations and real-world benchmark fair classification data,
demonstrating that we are able to achieve fair outcomes with robust if not
improved accuracy.
Related papers
- Fair Distillation: Teaching Fairness from Biased Teachers in Medical Imaging [16.599189934420885]
We propose the Fair Distillation (FairDi) method to address fairness concerns in deep learning.
We show that FairDi achieves significant gains in both overall and group-specific accuracy, along with improved fairness, compared to existing methods.
FairDi is adaptable to various medical tasks, such as classification and segmentation, and provides an effective solution for equitable model performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-18T16:50:34Z) - FairDgcl: Fairness-aware Recommendation with Dynamic Graph Contrastive Learning [48.38344934125999]
We study how to implement high-quality data augmentation to improve recommendation fairness.
Specifically, we propose FairDgcl, a dynamic graph adversarial contrastive learning framework.
We show that FairDgcl can simultaneously generate enhanced representations that possess both fairness and accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-23T04:43:03Z) - Dynamic Fair Federated Learning Based on Reinforcement Learning [19.033986978896074]
Federated learning enables a collaborative training and optimization of global models among a group of devices without sharing local data samples.
We propose a dynamic q fairness federated learning algorithm with reinforcement learning, called DQFFL.
Our DQFFL outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in terms of overall performance, fairness and convergence speed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-02T03:05:40Z) - Fair-CDA: Continuous and Directional Augmentation for Group Fairness [48.84385689186208]
We propose a fine-grained data augmentation strategy for imposing fairness constraints.
We show that group fairness can be achieved by regularizing the models on transition paths of sensitive features between groups.
Our proposed method does not assume any data generative model and ensures good generalization for both accuracy and fairness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-01T11:23:00Z) - DualFair: Fair Representation Learning at Both Group and Individual
Levels via Contrastive Self-supervision [73.80009454050858]
This work presents a self-supervised model, called DualFair, that can debias sensitive attributes like gender and race from learned representations.
Our model jointly optimize for two fairness criteria - group fairness and counterfactual fairness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-15T07:13:54Z) - Improving Recommendation Fairness via Data Augmentation [66.4071365614835]
Collaborative filtering based recommendation learns users' preferences from all users' historical behavior data, and has been popular to facilitate decision making.
A recommender system is considered unfair when it does not perform equally well for different user groups according to users' sensitive attributes.
In this paper, we study how to improve recommendation fairness from the data augmentation perspective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-13T13:11:46Z) - Fair Group-Shared Representations with Normalizing Flows [68.29997072804537]
We develop a fair representation learning algorithm which is able to map individuals belonging to different groups in a single group.
We show experimentally that our methodology is competitive with other fair representation learning algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-17T10:49:49Z) - MultiFair: Multi-Group Fairness in Machine Learning [52.24956510371455]
We study multi-group fairness in machine learning (MultiFair)
We propose a generic end-to-end algorithmic framework to solve it.
Our proposed framework is generalizable to many different settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-24T02:30:22Z) - Fair Mixup: Fairness via Interpolation [28.508444261249423]
We propose fair mixup, a new data augmentation strategy for imposing the fairness constraint.
We show that fairness can be achieved by regularizing the models on paths of interpolated samples between the groups.
We empirically show that it ensures a better generalization for both accuracy and fairness measurement in benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-11T06:57:26Z) - Fairness with Overlapping Groups [15.154984899546333]
A standard goal is to ensure the equality of fairness metrics across multiple overlapping groups simultaneously.
We reconsider this standard fair classification problem using a probabilistic population analysis.
Our approach unifies a variety of existing group-fair classification methods and enables extensions to a wide range of non-decomposable multiclass performance metrics and fairness measures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-24T05:01:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.