How to Handle Different Types of Out-of-Distribution Scenarios in Computational Argumentation? A Comprehensive and Fine-Grained Field Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.08316v3
• Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 14:02:44 GMT
• Title: How to Handle Different Types of Out-of-Distribution Scenarios in Computational Argumentation? A Comprehensive and Fine-Grained Field Study
• Authors: Andreas Waldis, Yufang Hou, Iryna Gurevych,
• Abstract summary: This work systematically assesses LMs' capabilities for out-of-distribution (OOD) scenarios. We find that the efficacy of such learning paradigms varies with the type of OOD. Specifically, while ICL excels for domain shifts, prompt-based fine-tuning surpasses for topic shifts.
• Score: 59.13867562744973
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The advent of pre-trained Language Models (LMs) has markedly advanced natural language processing, but their efficacy in out-of-distribution (OOD) scenarios remains a significant challenge. Computational argumentation (CA), modeling human argumentation processes, is a field notably impacted by these challenges because complex annotation schemes and high annotation costs naturally lead to resources barely covering the multiplicity of available text sources and topics. Due to this data scarcity, generalization to data from uncovered covariant distributions is a common challenge for CA tasks like stance detection or argument classification. This work systematically assesses LMs' capabilities for such OOD scenarios. While previous work targets specific OOD types like topic shifts or OOD uniformly, we address three prevalent OOD scenarios in CA: topic shift, domain shift, and language shift. Our findings challenge the previously asserted general superiority of in-context learning (ICL) for OOD. We find that the efficacy of such learning paradigms varies with the type of OOD. Specifically, while ICL excels for domain shifts, prompt-based fine-tuning surpasses for topic shifts. To sum up, we navigate the heterogeneity of OOD scenarios in CA and empirically underscore the potential of base-sized LMs in overcoming these challenges.

Related papers

• Large Language Models for Anomaly and Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Survey [18.570066068280212]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their effectiveness not only in natural language processing but also in broader applications. This survey focuses on the problem of anomaly and OOD detection under the context of LLMs. We propose a new taxonomy to categorize existing approaches into two classes based on the role played by LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T15:22:41Z)
• Out-of-Distribution Detection Using Peer-Class Generated by Large Language Model [0.0]
  Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is a critical task to ensure the reliability and security of machine learning models. In this paper, a novel method called ODPC is proposed, in which specific prompts to generate OOD peer classes of ID semantics are designed by a large language model. Experiments on five benchmark datasets show that the method we propose can yield state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T06:04:05Z)
• Exploring the Jungle of Bias: Political Bias Attribution in Language Models via Dependency Analysis [86.49858739347412]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have sparked intense debate regarding the prevalence of bias in these models and its mitigation. We propose a prompt-based method for the extraction of confounding and mediating attributes which contribute to the decision process. We find that the observed disparate treatment can at least in part be attributed to confounding and mitigating attributes and model misalignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T00:02:25Z)
• Generative Judge for Evaluating Alignment [84.09815387884753]
  We propose a generative judge with 13B parameters, Auto-J, designed to address these challenges. Our model is trained on user queries and LLM-generated responses under massive real-world scenarios. Experimentally, Auto-J outperforms a series of strong competitors, including both open-source and closed-source models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T07:27:15Z)
• Data Distribution Bottlenecks in Grounding Language Models to Knowledge Bases [9.610231090476857]
  Language models (LMs) have already demonstrated remarkable abilities in understanding and generating both natural and formal language. This paper is an experimental investigation aimed at uncovering the challenges that LMs encounter when tasked with knowledge base question answering (KBQA) Our experiments reveal that even when employed with our proposed data augmentation techniques, advanced small and large language models exhibit poor performance in various dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T12:06:45Z)
• Revisiting Out-of-distribution Robustness in NLP: Benchmark, Analysis, and LLMs Evaluations [111.88727295707454]
  This paper reexamines the research on out-of-distribution (OOD) robustness in the field of NLP. We propose a benchmark construction protocol that ensures clear differentiation and challenging distribution shifts. We conduct experiments on pre-trained language models for analysis and evaluation of OOD robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T17:47:03Z)
• Post Hoc Explanations of Language Models Can Improve Language Models [43.2109029463221]
  We present a novel framework, Amplifying Model Performance by Leveraging In-Context Learning with Post Hoc Explanations (AMPLIFY) We leverage post hoc explanation methods which output attribution scores (explanations) capturing the influence of each of the input features on model predictions. Our framework, AMPLIFY, leads to prediction accuracy improvements of about 10-25% over a wide range of tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T04:46:04Z)
• Pseudo-OOD training for robust language models [78.15712542481859]
  OOD detection is a key component of a reliable machine-learning model for any industry-scale application. We propose POORE - POsthoc pseudo-Ood REgularization, that generates pseudo-OOD samples using in-distribution (IND) data. We extensively evaluate our framework on three real-world dialogue systems, achieving new state-of-the-art in OOD detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-17T14:32:02Z)
• Rethinking Machine Learning Robustness via its Link with the Out-of-Distribution Problem [16.154434566725012]
  We investigate the causes behind machine learning models' susceptibility to adversarial examples. We propose an OOD generalization method that stands against both adversary-induced and natural distribution shifts. Our approach consistently improves robustness to OOD adversarial inputs and outperforms state-of-the-art defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-18T00:17:23Z)
• Learning Causal Semantic Representation for Out-of-Distribution Prediction [125.38836464226092]
  We propose a Causal Semantic Generative model (CSG) based on a causal reasoning so that the two factors are modeled separately. We show that CSG can identify the semantic factor by fitting training data, and this semantic-identification guarantees the boundedness of OOD generalization error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T13:16:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.