Approaches to Generative Artificial Intelligence, A Social Justice
Perspective
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12331v1
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 06:30:46 GMT
- Title: Approaches to Generative Artificial Intelligence, A Social Justice
Perspective
- Authors: Myke Healy
- Abstract summary: Rise of AI-driven writing assistance, dubbed 'AI-giarism' by Chan, will make plagiarism more accessible and less detectable.
This paper aims to explore generative AI from a social justice perspective, examining the training of these models, the inherent biases, and the potential injustices in detecting AI-generated writing.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In the 2023-2024 academic year, the widespread availability of generative
artificial intelligence, exemplified by ChatGPT's 1.6 billion monthly visits,
is set to impact academic integrity. With 77% of high school students
previously reporting engagement in dishonest behaviour, the rise of AI-driven
writing assistance, dubbed 'AI-giarism' by Chan (arXiv:2306.03358v2), will make
plagiarism more accessible and less detectable. While these concerns are
urgent, they also raise broader questions about the revolutionary nature of
this technology, including autonomy, data privacy, copyright, and equity. This
paper aims to explore generative AI from a social justice perspective,
examining the training of these models, the inherent biases, and the potential
injustices in detecting AI-generated writing.
Related papers
- Applications, challenges and ethical issues of AI and ChatGPT in
education [0.0]
Artificial Intelligence in recent years has shown an unprecedentedly impressive development.
This paper aims to describe the opportunities emerging from the use of artificial intelligence and ChatGPT to improve education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-22T14:48:13Z) - Artificial intelligence in social science: A study based on
bibliometrics analysis [0.0]
This article presents the results of a bibliometric analysis of AI-related publications in the social sciences over the last ten years (2013-2022).
More than 19,408 articles have been published, 85% from 2008 to 2022, showing that research in this field is increasing significantly year on year.
The United States is the country that publishes the most (20%), followed by China (13%)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-09T15:16:44Z) - ChatGPT and Beyond: The Generative AI Revolution in Education [0.21756081703275998]
This survey examines academic literature published between November, 2022 and July, 2023.
It aims to illuminate the evolving role of generative AI models, particularly ChatGPT, in education.
The findings of this review will empower educators, researchers, and policymakers to make informed decisions about the integration of AI technologies into learning environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-26T05:34:22Z) - Report of the 1st Workshop on Generative AI and Law [78.62063815165968]
This report presents the takeaways of the inaugural Workshop on Generative AI and Law (GenLaw)
A cross-disciplinary group of practitioners and scholars from computer science and law convened to discuss the technical, doctrinal, and policy challenges presented by law for Generative AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-11T04:13:37Z) - Exploration with Principles for Diverse AI Supervision [88.61687950039662]
Training large transformers using next-token prediction has given rise to groundbreaking advancements in AI.
While this generative AI approach has produced impressive results, it heavily leans on human supervision.
This strong reliance on human oversight poses a significant hurdle to the advancement of AI innovation.
We propose a novel paradigm termed Exploratory AI (EAI) aimed at autonomously generating high-quality training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-13T07:03:39Z) - FATE in AI: Towards Algorithmic Inclusivity and Accessibility [0.0]
To prevent algorithmic disparities, fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics (FATE) in AI are being implemented.
This study examines FATE-related desiderata, particularly transparency and ethics, in areas of the global South that are underserved by AI.
To promote inclusivity, a community-led strategy is proposed to collect and curate representative data for responsible AI design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-03T15:08:10Z) - The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and
Strategies [97.5153823429076]
The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed.
The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z) - Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030: The One Hundred Year Study on
Artificial Intelligence [74.2630823914258]
The report examines eight domains of typical urban settings on which AI is likely to have impact over the coming years.
It aims to provide the general public with a scientifically and technologically accurate portrayal of the current state of AI.
The charge for this report was given to the panel by the AI100 Standing Committee, chaired by Barbara Grosz of Harvard University.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-31T18:35:36Z) - Gathering Strength, Gathering Storms: The One Hundred Year Study on
Artificial Intelligence (AI100) 2021 Study Panel Report [40.38252510399319]
"Gathering Strength, Gathering Storms" is the second report in the "One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence" project.
It was written by a panel of 17 study authors, each of whom is deeply rooted in AI research.
The report concludes that AI has made a major leap from the lab to people's lives in recent years.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-27T21:00:36Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.