BenLLMEval: A Comprehensive Evaluation into the Potentials and Pitfalls of Large Language Models on Bengali NLP
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.13173v2
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:11:41 GMT
- Title: BenLLMEval: A Comprehensive Evaluation into the Potentials and Pitfalls of Large Language Models on Bengali NLP
- Authors: Mohsinul Kabir, Mohammed Saidul Islam, Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Mir Tafseer Nayeem, M Saiful Bari, Enamul Hoque,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as one of the most important breakthroughs in NLP.
This paper introduces BenLLM-Eval, which consists of a comprehensive evaluation of LLMs to benchmark their performance in the Bengali language.
Our experimental results demonstrate that while in some Bengali NLP tasks, zero-shot LLMs could achieve performance on par, or even better than current SOTA fine-tuned models.
- Score: 17.362068473064717
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as one of the most important breakthroughs in NLP for their impressive skills in language generation and other language-specific tasks. Though LLMs have been evaluated in various tasks, mostly in English, they have not yet undergone thorough evaluation in under-resourced languages such as Bengali (Bangla). To this end, this paper introduces BenLLM-Eval, which consists of a comprehensive evaluation of LLMs to benchmark their performance in the Bengali language that has modest resources. In this regard, we select various important and diverse Bengali NLP tasks, such as text summarization, question answering, paraphrasing, natural language inference, transliteration, text classification, and sentiment analysis for zero-shot evaluation of popular LLMs, namely, GPT-3.5, LLaMA-2-13b-chat, and Claude-2. Our experimental results demonstrate that while in some Bengali NLP tasks, zero-shot LLMs could achieve performance on par, or even better than current SOTA fine-tuned models; in most tasks, their performance is quite poor (with the performance of open-source LLMs like LLaMA-2-13b-chat being significantly bad) in comparison to the current SOTA results. Therefore, it calls for further efforts to develop a better understanding of LLMs in modest-resourced languages like Bengali.
Related papers
- Think Carefully and Check Again! Meta-Generation Unlocking LLMs for Low-Resource Cross-Lingual Summarization [108.6908427615402]
Cross-lingual summarization ( CLS) aims to generate a summary for the source text in a different target language.
Currently, instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) excel at various English tasks.
Recent studies have shown that LLMs' performance on CLS tasks remains unsatisfactory even with few-shot settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-26T00:39:44Z) - Better to Ask in English: Evaluation of Large Language Models on English, Low-resource and Cross-Lingual Settings [12.507989493130175]
GPT-4, Llama 2, and Gemini are evaluated for their effectiveness in English compared to other low-resource languages from South Asia.
Findings suggest GPT-4 outperformed Llama 2 and Gemini in all five prompt settings and across all languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T02:12:30Z) - Do Large Language Models Speak All Languages Equally? A Comparative Study in Low-Resource Settings [12.507989493130175]
Large language models (LLMs) have garnered significant interest in natural language processing (NLP)
Recent studies have highlighted the limitations of LLMs in low-resource languages.
We present datasets for sentiment and hate speech tasks by translating from English to Bangla, Hindi, and Urdu.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-05T05:09:23Z) - Too Late to Train, Too Early To Use? A Study on Necessity and Viability of Low-Resource Bengali LLMs [2.309018557701645]
We aim to explore the question of whether there is a need for English-oriented Large Language Models dedicated to a low-resource language.
We compare the performance of open-weight and closed-source LLMs against fine-tuned encoder-decoder models.
Our findings reveal that while LLMs generally excel in reasoning tasks, their performance in tasks requiring Bengali script generation is inconsistent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-29T11:50:16Z) - Unraveling the Dominance of Large Language Models Over Transformer Models for Bangla Natural Language Inference: A Comprehensive Study [0.0]
Natural Language Inference (NLI) is a cornerstone of Natural Language Processing (NLP)
This study addresses the underexplored area of evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) in low-resourced languages like Bengali.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-05T13:57:05Z) - Quantifying Multilingual Performance of Large Language Models Across Languages [48.40607157158246]
Large Language Models (LLMs) perform better on high-resource languages like English, German, and French, while their capabilities in low-resource languages remain inadequate.
We propose the Language Ranker, an intrinsic metric designed to benchmark and rank languages based on LLM performance using internal representations.
Our analysis reveals that high-resource languages exhibit higher similarity scores with English, demonstrating superior performance, while low-resource languages show lower similarity scores.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-17T16:53:16Z) - CIF-Bench: A Chinese Instruction-Following Benchmark for Evaluating the Generalizability of Large Language Models [53.9835961434552]
We introduce the Chinese Instruction-Following Benchmark (CIF-Bench) to evaluate the generalizability of large language models (LLMs) to the Chinese language.
CIF-Bench comprises 150 tasks and 15,000 input-output pairs, developed by native speakers to test complex reasoning and Chinese cultural nuances.
To mitigate data contamination, we release only half of the dataset publicly, with the remainder kept private, and introduce diversified instructions to minimize score variance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T16:02:12Z) - High-quality Data-to-Text Generation for Severely Under-Resourced
Languages with Out-of-the-box Large Language Models [5.632410663467911]
We explore the extent to which pretrained large language models (LLMs) can bridge the performance gap for under-resourced languages.
We find that LLMs easily set the state of the art for the under-resourced languages by substantial margins.
For all our languages, human evaluation shows on-a-par performance with humans for our best systems, but BLEU scores collapse compared to English.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-19T16:29:40Z) - Large Language Models: A Survey [69.72787936480394]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have drawn a lot of attention due to their strong performance on a wide range of natural language tasks.
LLMs' ability of general-purpose language understanding and generation is acquired by training billions of model's parameters on massive amounts of text data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-09T05:37:09Z) - Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Reranking with Large Language Models for
Low-Resource Languages [51.301942056881146]
We investigate how large language models (LLMs) function as rerankers in cross-lingual information retrieval systems for African languages.
Our implementation covers English and four African languages (Hausa, Somali, Swahili, and Yoruba)
We examine cross-lingual reranking with queries in English and passages in the African languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-26T18:38:54Z) - Democratizing LLMs for Low-Resource Languages by Leveraging their English Dominant Abilities with Linguistically-Diverse Prompts [75.33019401706188]
Large language models (LLMs) are known to effectively perform tasks by simply observing few exemplars.
We propose to assemble synthetic exemplars from a diverse set of high-resource languages to prompt the LLMs to translate from any language into English.
Our unsupervised prompting method performs on par with supervised few-shot learning in LLMs of different sizes for translations between English and 13 Indic and 21 African low-resource languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-20T08:27:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.