Dynamic Interpretability for Model Comparison via Decision Rules

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.17095v1
• Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 09:42:49 GMT
• Title: Dynamic Interpretability for Model Comparison via Decision Rules
• Authors: Adam Rida, Marie-Jeanne Lesot, Xavier Renard, and Christophe Marsala
• Abstract summary: This paper addresses the challenge of understanding and explaining differences between machine learning models. We propose DeltaXplainer, a model-agnostic method for generating rule-based explanations.
• Score: 0.8099700053397276
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Explainable AI (XAI) methods have mostly been built to investigate and shed light on single machine learning models and are not designed to capture and explain differences between multiple models effectively. This paper addresses the challenge of understanding and explaining differences between machine learning models, which is crucial for model selection, monitoring and lifecycle management in real-world applications. We propose DeltaXplainer, a model-agnostic method for generating rule-based explanations describing the differences between two binary classifiers. To assess the effectiveness of DeltaXplainer, we conduct experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets, covering various model comparison scenarios involving different types of concept drift.

Related papers

• Learning Low-Dimensional Strain Models of Soft Robots by Looking at the Evolution of Their Shape with Application to Model-Based Control [2.058941610795796]
  This paper introduces a streamlined method for learning low-dimensional, physics-based models. We validate our approach through simulations with various planar soft manipulators. Thanks to the capability of the method of generating physically compatible models, the learned models can be straightforwardly combined with model-based control policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T18:37:22Z)
• Learnable & Interpretable Model Combination in Dynamic Systems Modeling [0.0]
  We discuss which types of models are usually combined and propose a model interface that is capable of expressing a variety of mixed equation based models. We propose a new wildcard topology, that is capable of describing the generic connection between two combined models in an easy to interpret fashion. The contributions of this paper are highlighted at a proof of concept: Different connection topologies between two models are learned, interpreted and compared.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T11:17:11Z)
• Interpretable Differencing of Machine Learning Models [20.99877540751412]
  We formalize the problem of model differencing as one of predicting a dissimilarity function of two ML models' outputs. A Joint Surrogate Tree (JST) is composed of two conjoined decision tree surrogates for the two models. A JST provides an intuitive representation of differences and places the changes in the context of the models' decision logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-10T16:15:55Z)
• MACE: An Efficient Model-Agnostic Framework for Counterfactual Explanation [132.77005365032468]
  We propose a novel framework of Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanation (MACE) In our MACE approach, we propose a novel RL-based method for finding good counterfactual examples and a gradient-less descent method for improving proximity. Experiments on public datasets validate the effectiveness with better validity, sparsity and proximity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T04:57:06Z)
• Model-Based Deep Learning: On the Intersection of Deep Learning and Optimization [101.32332941117271]
  Decision making algorithms are used in a multitude of different applications. Deep learning approaches that use highly parametric architectures tuned from data without relying on mathematical models are becoming increasingly popular. Model-based optimization and data-centric deep learning are often considered to be distinct disciplines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-05T13:40:08Z)
• IMACS: Image Model Attribution Comparison Summaries [16.80986701058596]
  We introduce IMACS, a method that combines gradient-based model attributions with aggregation and visualization techniques. IMACS extracts salient input features from an evaluation dataset, clusters them based on similarity, then visualizes differences in model attributions for similar input features. We show how our technique can uncover behavioral differences caused by domain shift between two models trained on satellite images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T21:35:14Z)
• Model-agnostic multi-objective approach for the evolutionary discovery of mathematical models [55.41644538483948]
  In modern data science, it is more interesting to understand the properties of the model, which parts could be replaced to obtain better results. We use multi-objective evolutionary optimization for composite data-driven model learning to obtain the algorithm's desired properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T11:17:09Z)
• Multivariate Data Explanation by Jumping Emerging Patterns Visualization [78.6363825307044]
  We present VAX (multiVariate dAta eXplanation), a new VA method to support the identification and visual interpretation of patterns in multivariate data sets. Unlike the existing similar approaches, VAX uses the concept of Jumping Emerging Patterns to identify and aggregate several diversified patterns, producing explanations through logic combinations of data variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-21T13:49:44Z)
• Beyond Trivial Counterfactual Explanations with Diverse Valuable Explanations [64.85696493596821]
  In computer vision applications, generative counterfactual methods indicate how to perturb a model's input to change its prediction. We propose a counterfactual method that learns a perturbation in a disentangled latent space that is constrained using a diversity-enforcing loss. Our model improves the success rate of producing high-quality valuable explanations when compared to previous state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T12:57:34Z)
• Interpretable Multi-dataset Evaluation for Named Entity Recognition [110.64368106131062]
  We present a general methodology for interpretable evaluation for the named entity recognition (NER) task. The proposed evaluation method enables us to interpret the differences in models and datasets, as well as the interplay between them. By making our analysis tool available, we make it easy for future researchers to run similar analyses and drive progress in this area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T10:53:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.