Representational Difference Explanations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23917v1
• Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 18:09:44 GMT
• Title: Representational Difference Explanations
• Authors: Neehar Kondapaneni, Oisin Mac Aodha, Pietro Perona,
• Abstract summary: We validate our method, which we call Representational Differences Explanations (RDX), by using it to compare models with known conceptual differences.<n>RDX is applied to state-of-the-art models on challenging subsets of the ImageNet and iNaturalist datasets.
• Score: 27.72186215265676
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We propose a method for discovering and visualizing the differences between two learned representations, enabling more direct and interpretable model comparisons. We validate our method, which we call Representational Differences Explanations (RDX), by using it to compare models with known conceptual differences and demonstrate that it recovers meaningful distinctions where existing explainable AI (XAI) techniques fail. Applied to state-of-the-art models on challenging subsets of the ImageNet and iNaturalist datasets, RDX reveals both insightful representational differences and subtle patterns in the data. Although comparison is a cornerstone of scientific analysis, current tools in machine learning, namely post hoc XAI methods, struggle to support model comparison effectively. Our work addresses this gap by introducing an effective and explainable tool for contrasting model representations.

Related papers

• A Comparative Study of Explainable AI Methods: Model-Agnostic vs. Model-Specific Approaches [0.0]
  I examine how LIME and SHAP differ from Grad-CAM and Guided Backpropagation when interpreting ResNet50 predictions.<n>I found that each method reveals different aspects of the models decision-making process.<n>My analysis shows there is no "one-size-fits-all" solution for model interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T20:13:20Z)
• MOUNTAINEER: Topology-Driven Visual Analytics for Comparing Local Explanations [6.835413642522898]
  Topological Data Analysis (TDA) can be an effective method in this domain since it can be used to transform attributions into uniform graph representations. We present a novel topology-driven visual analytics tool, Mountaineer, that allows ML practitioners to interactively analyze and compare these representations. We show how Mountaineer enabled us to compare black-box ML explanations and discern regions of and causes of disagreements between different explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T19:28:50Z)
• CNN-based explanation ensembling for dataset, representation and explanations evaluation [1.1060425537315088]
  We explore the potential of ensembling explanations generated by deep classification models using convolutional model. Through experimentation and analysis, we aim to investigate the implications of combining explanations to uncover a more coherent and reliable patterns of the model's behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T08:39:29Z)
• Beyond DAGs: A Latent Partial Causal Model for Multimodal Learning [80.44084021062105]
  We propose a novel latent partial causal model for multimodal data, featuring two latent coupled variables, connected by an undirected edge, to represent the transfer of knowledge across modalities.<n>Under specific statistical assumptions, we establish an identifiability result, demonstrating that representations learned by multimodal contrastive learning correspond to the latent coupled variables up to a trivial transformation.<n>Experiments on a pre-trained CLIP model embodies disentangled representations, enabling few-shot learning and improving domain generalization across diverse real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-09T07:18:06Z)
• A Probabilistic Model Behind Self-Supervised Learning [53.64989127914936]
  In self-supervised learning (SSL), representations are learned via an auxiliary task without annotated labels. We present a generative latent variable model for self-supervised learning. We show that several families of discriminative SSL, including contrastive methods, induce a comparable distribution over representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T13:31:17Z)
• Dynamic Interpretability for Model Comparison via Decision Rules [0.8099700053397276]
  This paper addresses the challenge of understanding and explaining differences between machine learning models. We propose DeltaXplainer, a model-agnostic method for generating rule-based explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T09:42:49Z)
• Beyond Explaining: Opportunities and Challenges of XAI-Based Model Improvement [75.00655434905417]
  Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is an emerging research field bringing transparency to highly complex machine learning (ML) models. This paper offers a comprehensive overview over techniques that apply XAI practically for improving various properties of ML models. We show empirically through experiments on toy and realistic settings how explanations can help improve properties such as model generalization ability or reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T15:44:28Z)
• IMACS: Image Model Attribution Comparison Summaries [16.80986701058596]
  We introduce IMACS, a method that combines gradient-based model attributions with aggregation and visualization techniques. IMACS extracts salient input features from an evaluation dataset, clusters them based on similarity, then visualizes differences in model attributions for similar input features. We show how our technique can uncover behavioral differences caused by domain shift between two models trained on satellite images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T21:35:14Z)
• Multivariate Data Explanation by Jumping Emerging Patterns Visualization [78.6363825307044]
  We present VAX (multiVariate dAta eXplanation), a new VA method to support the identification and visual interpretation of patterns in multivariate data sets. Unlike the existing similar approaches, VAX uses the concept of Jumping Emerging Patterns to identify and aggregate several diversified patterns, producing explanations through logic combinations of data variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-21T13:49:44Z)
• Beyond Trivial Counterfactual Explanations with Diverse Valuable Explanations [64.85696493596821]
  In computer vision applications, generative counterfactual methods indicate how to perturb a model's input to change its prediction. We propose a counterfactual method that learns a perturbation in a disentangled latent space that is constrained using a diversity-enforcing loss. Our model improves the success rate of producing high-quality valuable explanations when compared to previous state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T12:57:34Z)
• Interpretable Multi-dataset Evaluation for Named Entity Recognition [110.64368106131062]
  We present a general methodology for interpretable evaluation for the named entity recognition (NER) task. The proposed evaluation method enables us to interpret the differences in models and datasets, as well as the interplay between them. By making our analysis tool available, we make it easy for future researchers to run similar analyses and drive progress in this area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T10:53:27Z)
• A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classification [52.879658637466605]
  We develop a list of diagnostic properties for evaluating existing explainability techniques. We compare the saliency scores assigned by the explainability techniques with human annotations of salient input regions to find relations between a model's performance and the agreement of its rationales with human ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-25T12:01:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.