How Prevalent is Gender Bias in ChatGPT? -- Exploring German and English ChatGPT Responses

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.03031v3
• Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 13:04:57 GMT
• Title: How Prevalent is Gender Bias in ChatGPT? -- Exploring German and English ChatGPT Responses
• Authors: Stefanie Urchs, Veronika Thurner, Matthias Aßenmacher, Christian Heumann, Stephanie Thiemichen,
• Abstract summary: We show that ChatGPT is indeed useful for helping non-IT users draft texts for their daily work. It is absolutely crucial to thoroughly check the system's responses for biases as well as for syntactic and grammatical mistakes.
• Score: 0.20971479389679337
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With the introduction of ChatGPT, OpenAI made large language models (LLM) accessible to users with limited IT expertise. However, users with no background in natural language processing (NLP) might lack a proper understanding of LLMs. Thus the awareness of their inherent limitations, and therefore will take the systems' output at face value. In this paper, we systematically analyse prompts and the generated responses to identify possible problematic issues with a special focus on gender biases, which users need to be aware of when processing the system's output. We explore how ChatGPT reacts in English and German if prompted to answer from a female, male, or neutral perspective. In an in-depth investigation, we examine selected prompts and analyse to what extent responses differ if the system is prompted several times in an identical way. On this basis, we show that ChatGPT is indeed useful for helping non-IT users draft texts for their daily work. However, it is absolutely crucial to thoroughly check the system's responses for biases as well as for syntactic and grammatical mistakes.

Related papers

• First-Person Fairness in Chatbots [13.787745105316043]
  We study "first-person fairness," which means fairness toward the user. This includes providing high-quality responses to all users regardless of their identity or background. We propose a scalable, privacy-preserving method for evaluating one aspect of first-person fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T17:59:47Z)
• Exploring ChatGPT's Capabilities on Vulnerability Management [56.4403395100589]
  We explore ChatGPT's capabilities on 6 tasks involving the complete vulnerability management process with a large-scale dataset containing 70,346 samples. One notable example is ChatGPT's proficiency in tasks like generating titles for software bug reports. Our findings reveal the difficulties encountered by ChatGPT and shed light on promising future directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-11T11:01:13Z)
• Comprehensive Assessment of Toxicity in ChatGPT [49.71090497696024]
  We evaluate the toxicity in ChatGPT by utilizing instruction-tuning datasets. prompts in creative writing tasks can be 2x more likely to elicit toxic responses. Certain deliberately toxic prompts, designed in earlier studies, no longer yield harmful responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T14:37:53Z)
• Primacy Effect of ChatGPT [69.49920102917598]
  We study the primacy effect of ChatGPT: the tendency of selecting the labels at earlier positions as the answer. We hope that our experiments and analyses provide additional insights into building more reliable ChatGPT-based solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T00:37:28Z)
• ChatPRCS: A Personalized Support System for English Reading Comprehension based on ChatGPT [3.847982502219679]
  This paper presents a novel personalized support system for reading comprehension, referred to as ChatPRCS. ChatPRCS employs methods including reading comprehension proficiency prediction, question generation, and automatic evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-22T11:46:44Z)
• ChatGPT in the Classroom: An Analysis of Its Strengths and Weaknesses for Solving Undergraduate Computer Science Questions [5.962828109329824]
  ChatGPT is an AI language model developed by OpenAI that can understand and generate human-like text. There is concern that students may leverage ChatGPT to complete take-home assignments and exams and obtain favorable grades without genuinely acquiring knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-28T17:26:32Z)
• To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: That is the question! [78.407861566006]
  This study provides a comprehensive and contemporary assessment of the most recent techniques in ChatGPT detection. We have curated a benchmark dataset consisting of prompts from ChatGPT and humans, including diverse questions from medical, open Q&A, and finance domains. Our evaluation results demonstrate that none of the existing methods can effectively detect ChatGPT-generated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T03:04:28Z)
• Towards Making the Most of ChatGPT for Machine Translation [75.576405098545]
  ChatGPT shows remarkable capabilities for machine translation (MT) Several prior studies have shown that it achieves comparable results to commercial systems for high-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T03:35:21Z)
• ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of none [4.693597927153063]
  OpenAI has released the Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) We examined ChatGPT's capabilities on 25 diverse analytical NLP tasks. We automated ChatGPT and GPT-4 prompting process and analyzed more than 49k responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-21T15:20:37Z)
• Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver? [113.22611481694825]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to perform a variety of natural language processing (NLP) tasks zero-shot. Recently, the debut of ChatGPT has drawn a great deal of attention from the natural language processing (NLP) community. It is not yet known whether ChatGPT can serve as a generalist model that can perform many NLP tasks zero-shot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T09:44:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.