First-Person Fairness in Chatbots

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19803v1
• Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 17:59:47 GMT
• Title: First-Person Fairness in Chatbots
• Authors: Tyna Eloundou, Alex Beutel, David G. Robinson, Keren Gu-Lemberg, Anna-Luisa Brakman, Pamela Mishkin, Meghan Shah, Johannes Heidecke, Lilian Weng, Adam Tauman Kalai,
• Abstract summary: We study "first-person fairness," which means fairness toward the user. This includes providing high-quality responses to all users regardless of their identity or background. We propose a scalable, privacy-preserving method for evaluating one aspect of first-person fairness.
• Score: 13.787745105316043
• License:
• Abstract: Chatbots like ChatGPT are used for diverse purposes, ranging from resume writing to entertainment. These real-world applications are different from the institutional uses, such as resume screening or credit scoring, which have been the focus of much of AI research on fairness. Ensuring equitable treatment for all users in these first-person contexts is critical. In this work, we study "first-person fairness," which means fairness toward the chatbot user. This includes providing high-quality responses to all users regardless of their identity or background and avoiding harmful stereotypes. We propose a scalable, privacy-preserving method for evaluating one aspect of first-person fairness across a large, heterogeneous corpus of real-world chatbot interactions. Specifically, we assess potential bias linked to users' names, which can serve as proxies for demographic attributes like gender or race, in chatbot systems such as ChatGPT, which provide mechanisms for storing and using user names. Our method leverages a second language model to privately analyze name-sensitivity in the chatbot's responses. We verify the validity of these annotations through independent human evaluation. Further, we show that post-training interventions, including RL, significantly mitigate harmful stereotypes. Our approach also yields succinct descriptions of response differences across tasks. For instance, in the "writing a story" task, chatbot responses show a tendency to create protagonists whose gender matches the likely gender inferred from the user's name. Moreover, a pattern emerges where users with female-associated names receive responses with friendlier and simpler language slightly more often than users with male-associated names. Finally, we provide the system messages required for external researchers to further investigate ChatGPT's behavior with hypothetical user profiles.

Related papers

• Primacy Effect of ChatGPT [69.49920102917598]
  We study the primacy effect of ChatGPT: the tendency of selecting the labels at earlier positions as the answer. We hope that our experiments and analyses provide additional insights into building more reliable ChatGPT-based solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T00:37:28Z)
• How Prevalent is Gender Bias in ChatGPT? -- Exploring German and English ChatGPT Responses [0.20971479389679337]
  We show that ChatGPT is indeed useful for helping non-IT users draft texts for their daily work. It is absolutely crucial to thoroughly check the system's responses for biases as well as for syntactic and grammatical mistakes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-21T07:54:25Z)
• Adding guardrails to advanced chatbots [5.203329540700177]
  Launch of ChatGPT in November 2022 has ushered in a new era of AI. There are already concerns that humans may be replaced by chatbots for a variety of jobs. These biases may cause significant harm and/or inequity toward different subpopulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T02:23:04Z)
• ChatGPT or Human? Detect and Explain. Explaining Decisions of Machine Learning Model for Detecting Short ChatGPT-generated Text [2.0378492681344493]
  We study whether a machine learning model can be effectively trained to accurately distinguish between original human and seemingly human (that is, ChatGPT-generated) text. We employ an explainable artificial intelligence framework to gain insight into the reasoning behind the model trained to differentiate between ChatGPT-generated and human-generated text. Our study focuses on short online reviews, conducting two experiments comparing human-generated and ChatGPT-generated text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T08:06:08Z)
• Understanding How People Rate Their Conversations [73.17730062864314]
  We conduct a study to better understand how people rate their interactions with conversational agents. We focus on agreeableness and extraversion as variables that may explain variation in ratings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T00:45:32Z)
• One Chatbot Per Person: Creating Personalized Chatbots based on Implicit User Profiles [31.432585994256375]
  Existing personalized approaches tried to incorporate several text descriptions as explicit user profiles. We train a personalized language model to construct a general user profile from the user's historical responses. We design a personalized decoder to fuse two decoding strategies, including generating a word from the generic vocabulary and copying one word from the user's personalized vocabulary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-20T20:33:12Z)
• Revealing Persona Biases in Dialogue Systems [64.96908171646808]
  We present the first large-scale study on persona biases in dialogue systems. We conduct analyses on personas of different social classes, sexual orientations, races, and genders. In our studies of the Blender and DialoGPT dialogue systems, we show that the choice of personas can affect the degree of harms in generated responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T05:44:41Z)
• Put Chatbot into Its Interlocutor's Shoes: New Framework to Learn Chatbot Responding with Intention [55.77218465471519]
  This paper proposes an innovative framework to train chatbots to possess human-like intentions. Our framework included a guiding robot and an interlocutor model that plays the role of humans. We examined our framework using three experimental setups and evaluate the guiding robot with four different metrics to demonstrated flexibility and performance advantages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-30T15:24:37Z)
• Dialogue History Matters! Personalized Response Selectionin Multi-turn Retrieval-based Chatbots [62.295373408415365]
  We propose a personalized hybrid matching network (PHMN) for context-response matching. Our contributions are two-fold: 1) our model extracts personalized wording behaviors from user-specific dialogue history as extra matching information. We evaluate our model on two large datasets with user identification, i.e., personalized dialogue Corpus Ubuntu (P- Ubuntu) and personalized Weibo dataset (P-Weibo)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-17T09:42:11Z)
• Personalized Chatbot Trustworthiness Ratings [19.537492400265577]
  We envision a personalized rating methodology for chatbots that relies on separate rating modules for each issue. The method is independent of the specific trust issues and is parametric to the aggregation procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-13T22:42:45Z)
• A Neural Topical Expansion Framework for Unstructured Persona-oriented Dialogue Generation [52.743311026230714]
  Persona Exploration and Exploitation (PEE) is able to extend the predefined user persona description with semantically correlated content. PEE consists of two main modules: persona exploration and persona exploitation. Our approach outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in terms of both automatic and human evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-06T08:24:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.