Kick Bad Guys Out! Conditionally Activated Anomaly Detection in Federated Learning with Zero-Knowledge Proof Verification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04055v5
• Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 00:30:15 GMT
• Title: Kick Bad Guys Out! Conditionally Activated Anomaly Detection in Federated Learning with Zero-Knowledge Proof Verification
• Authors: Shanshan Han, Wenxuan Wu, Baturalp Buyukates, Weizhao Jin, Qifan Zhang, Yuhang Yao, Salman Avestimehr, Chaoyang He,
• Abstract summary: Federated Learning (FL) systems are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, such as model poisoning and backdoor attacks.<n>We propose a novel anomaly detection method designed specifically for practical FL scenarios.<n>Our approach employs a two-stage, conditionally activated detection mechanism.
• Score: 22.078088272837068
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) systems are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, such as model poisoning and backdoor attacks. However, existing defense mechanisms often fall short in real-world settings due to key limitations: they may rely on impractical assumptions, introduce distortions by modifying aggregation functions, or degrade model performance even in benign scenarios. To address these issues, we propose a novel anomaly detection method designed specifically for practical FL scenarios. Our approach employs a two-stage, conditionally activated detection mechanism: cross-round check first detects whether suspicious activity has occurred, and, if warranted, a cross-client check filters out malicious participants. This mechanism preserves utility while avoiding unrealistic assumptions. Moreover, to ensure the transparency and integrity of the defense mechanism, we incorporate zero-knowledge proofs, enabling clients to verify the detection without relying solely on the server's goodwill. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first method to bridge the gap between theoretical advances in FL security and the demands of real-world deployment. Extensive experiments across diverse tasks and real-world edge devices demonstrate the effectiveness of our method over state-of-the-art defenses.

Related papers

• Preliminary Investigation into Uncertainty-Aware Attack Stage Classification [81.28215542218724]
  This work addresses the problem of attack stage inference under uncertainty.<n>We propose a classification approach based on Evidential Deep Learning (EDL), which models predictive uncertainty by outputting parameters of a Dirichlet distribution over possible stages.<n>Preliminary experiments in a simulated environment demonstrate that the proposed model can accurately infer the stage of an attack with confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T06:58:00Z)
• Hear No Evil: Detecting Gradient Leakage by Malicious Servers in Federated Learning [35.64232606410778]
  gradient updates in federated learning can unintentionally reveal sensitive information about a client's local data.<n>This paper provides the first comprehensive analysis of malicious gradient leakage attacks and the model manipulation techniques that enable them.<n>We propose a simple, lightweight, and broadly applicable client-side detection mechanism that flags suspicious model updates before local training begins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T17:49:26Z)
• CANTXSec: A Deterministic Intrusion Detection and Prevention System for CAN Bus Monitoring ECU Activations [53.036288487863786]
  We propose CANTXSec, the first deterministic Intrusion Detection and Prevention system based on physical ECU activations.<n>It detects and prevents classical attacks in the CAN bus, while detecting advanced attacks that have been less investigated in the literature.<n>We prove the effectiveness of our solution on a physical testbed, where we achieve 100% detection accuracy in both classes of attacks while preventing 100% of FIAs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-14T13:37:07Z)
• Exposing the Ghost in the Transformer: Abnormal Detection for Large Language Models via Hidden State Forensics [5.384257830522198]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) in critical applications have introduced severe reliability and security risks.<n>These vulnerabilities have been weaponized by malicious actors, leading to unauthorized access, widespread misinformation, and compromised system integrity.<n>We introduce a novel approach to detecting abnormal behaviors in LLMs via hidden state forensics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T05:58:14Z)
• Unleashing the Power of Pre-trained Encoders for Universal Adversarial Attack Detection [21.03032944637112]
  Adrial attacks pose a critical security threat to real-world AI systems.<n>This paper proposes a lightweight adversarial detection framework based on the large-scale pre-trained vision-language model CLIP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T05:21:45Z)
• Fundamental Limitations in Defending LLM Finetuning APIs [61.29028411001255]
  We show that defences of fine-tuning APIs are fundamentally limited in their ability to prevent fine-tuning attacks. We construct 'pointwise-undetectable' attacks that repurpose entropy in benign model outputs to covertly transmit dangerous knowledge. We test our attacks against the OpenAI fine-tuning API, finding they succeed in eliciting answers to harmful multiple-choice questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T18:45:01Z)
• Dual Defense: Enhancing Privacy and Mitigating Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning [10.102889257118145]
  Federated learning (FL) is inherently susceptible to privacy breaches and poisoning attacks.<n>This paper introduces a Dual Defense Federated learning (DDFed) framework.<n>DDFed boosts privacy protection and mitigates poisoning attacks, without introducing new participant roles or disrupting the existing FL topology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T12:28:20Z)
• Celtibero: Robust Layered Aggregation for Federated Learning [0.0]
  We introduce Celtibero, a novel defense mechanism that integrates layered aggregation to enhance robustness against adversarial manipulation. We demonstrate that Celtibero consistently achieves high main task accuracy (MTA) while maintaining minimal attack success rates (ASR) across a range of untargeted and targeted poisoning attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-26T12:54:00Z)
• Mitigating Malicious Attacks in Federated Learning via Confidence-aware Defense [3.685395311534351]
  Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning diagram that enables multiple clients to collaboratively train a global model without sharing their private local data. FL systems are vulnerable to attacks that are happening in malicious clients through data poisoning and model poisoning. Existing defense methods typically focus on mitigating specific types of poisoning and are often ineffective against unseen types of attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T20:27:45Z)
• Poisoning with A Pill: Circumventing Detection in Federated Learning [33.915489514978084]
  This paper proposes a generic and attack-agnostic augmentation approach designed to enhance the effectiveness and stealthiness of existing FL poisoning attacks against detection in FL. Specifically, we employ a three-stage methodology that strategically constructs, generates, and injects poison into a pill during the FL training, named as pill construction, pill poisoning, and pill injection accordingly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T05:34:47Z)
• Watch the Watcher! Backdoor Attacks on Security-Enhancing Diffusion Models [65.30406788716104]
  This work investigates the vulnerabilities of security-enhancing diffusion models. We demonstrate that these models are highly susceptible to DIFF2, a simple yet effective backdoor attack. Case studies show that DIFF2 can significantly reduce both post-purification and certified accuracy across benchmark datasets and models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T02:39:43Z)
• Bridging the Gap: Automated Analysis of Sancus [2.045495982086173]
  We propose a new method to reduce this gap in the Sancus embedded security architecture. Our method either finds attacks in the given threat model or gives probabilistic guarantees on the security of the system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T07:26:36Z)
• Enabling Privacy-Preserving Cyber Threat Detection with Federated Learning [4.475514208635884]
  This study systematically profiles the (in)feasibility of learning for privacy-preserving cyber threat detection in terms of effectiveness, byzantine resilience, and efficiency. It shows that FL-trained detection models can achieve a performance that is comparable to centrally trained counterparts. Under a realistic threat model, FL turns out to be adversary-resistant to attacks of both data poisoning and model poisoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T01:16:56Z)
• Unlearning Backdoor Threats: Enhancing Backdoor Defense in Multimodal Contrastive Learning via Local Token Unlearning [49.242828934501986]
  Multimodal contrastive learning has emerged as a powerful paradigm for building high-quality features. backdoor attacks subtly embed malicious behaviors within the model during training. We introduce an innovative token-based localized forgetting training regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-24T18:33:15Z)
• FreqFed: A Frequency Analysis-Based Approach for Mitigating Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning [98.43475653490219]
  Federated learning (FL) is susceptible to poisoning attacks. FreqFed is a novel aggregation mechanism that transforms the model updates into the frequency domain. We demonstrate that FreqFed can mitigate poisoning attacks effectively with a negligible impact on the utility of the aggregated model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T16:56:24Z)
• Ring-A-Bell! How Reliable are Concept Removal Methods for Diffusion Models? [52.238883592674696]
  Ring-A-Bell is a model-agnostic red-teaming tool for T2I diffusion models. It identifies problematic prompts for diffusion models with the corresponding generation of inappropriate content. Our results show that Ring-A-Bell, by manipulating safe prompting benchmarks, can transform prompts that were originally regarded as safe to evade existing safety mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T02:11:20Z)
• Avoid Adversarial Adaption in Federated Learning by Multi-Metric Investigations [55.2480439325792]
  Federated Learning (FL) facilitates decentralized machine learning model training, preserving data privacy, lowering communication costs, and boosting model performance through diversified data sources. FL faces vulnerabilities such as poisoning attacks, undermining model integrity with both untargeted performance degradation and targeted backdoor attacks. We define a new notion of strong adaptive adversaries, capable of adapting to multiple objectives simultaneously. MESAS is the first defense robust against strong adaptive adversaries, effective in real-world data scenarios, with an average overhead of just 24.37 seconds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T11:44:42Z)
• FLIP: A Provable Defense Framework for Backdoor Mitigation in Federated Learning [66.56240101249803]
  We study how hardening benign clients can affect the global model (and the malicious clients) We propose a trigger reverse engineering based defense and show that our method can achieve improvement with guarantee robustness. Our results on eight competing SOTA defense methods show the empirical superiority of our method on both single-shot and continuous FL backdoor attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-23T22:24:03Z)
• Certifiers Make Neural Networks Vulnerable to Availability Attacks [70.69104148250614]
  We show for the first time that fallback strategies can be deliberately triggered by an adversary. In addition to naturally occurring abstains for some inputs and perturbations, the adversary can use training-time attacks to deliberately trigger the fallback. We design two novel availability attacks, which show the practical relevance of these threats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-25T15:49:10Z)
• No Need to Know Physics: Resilience of Process-based Model-free Anomaly Detection for Industrial Control Systems [95.54151664013011]
  We present a novel framework to generate adversarial spoofing signals that violate physical properties of the system. We analyze four anomaly detectors published at top security conferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-07T11:02:44Z)
• Adversarial Attacks against Face Recognition: A Comprehensive Study [3.766020696203255]
  Face recognition (FR) systems have demonstrated outstanding verification performance. Recent studies show that (deep) FR systems exhibit an intriguing vulnerability to imperceptible or perceptible but natural-looking adversarial input images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-22T22:46:00Z)
• Adversarial vs behavioural-based defensive AI with joint, continual and active learning: automated evaluation of robustness to deception, poisoning and concept drift [62.997667081978825]
  Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have brought new capabilities to behavioural analysis (UEBA) for cyber-security. In this paper, we present a solution to effectively mitigate this attack by improving the detection process and efficiently leveraging human expertise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-13T13:54:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.