Three Disclaimers for Safe Disclosure: A Cardwriter for Reporting the Use of Generative AI in Writing Process

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.09041v1
• Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 16:55:50 GMT
• Title: Three Disclaimers for Safe Disclosure: A Cardwriter for Reporting the Use of Generative AI in Writing Process
• Authors: Won Ik Cho, Eunjung Cho, Hyeonji Shin,
• Abstract summary: "Cardwriter" produces a short report for authors to declare their use of generative AI in their writing process. The demo is available online at https://cardwriter.vercel.app.
• Score: 4.358289251981747
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used in the academic writing process. This is despite the current lack of unified framework for reporting the use of machine assistance. In this work, we propose "Cardwriter", an intuitive interface that produces a short report for authors to declare their use of generative AI in their writing process. The demo is available online, at https://cardwriter.vercel.app

Related papers

• LLM-DetectAIve: a Tool for Fine-Grained Machine-Generated Text Detection [87.43727192273772]
  It is often hard to tell whether a piece of text was human-written or machine-generated. We present LLM-DetectAIve, designed for fine-grained detection. It supports four categories: (i) human-written, (ii) machine-generated, (iii) machine-written, then machine-humanized, and (iv) human-written, then machine-polished.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T07:43:17Z)
• Dialogue with Robots: Proposals for Broadening Participation and Research in the SLIVAR Community [57.56212633174706]
  The ability to interact with machines using natural human language is becoming commonplace, but expected. In this paper, we chronicle the recent history of this growing field of spoken dialogue with robots. We offer the community three proposals, the first focused on education, the second on benchmarks, and the third on the modeling of language when it comes to spoken interaction with robots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T15:03:27Z)
• Perceptions and Detection of AI Use in Manuscript Preparation for Academic Journals [1.881901067333374]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have produced both excitement and worry about how AI will impact academic writing. Authors of academic publications may decide to voluntarily disclose any AI tools they use to revise their manuscripts. journals and conferences could begin mandating disclosure and/or turn to using detection services.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-19T06:04:46Z)
• PaperCard for Reporting Machine Assistance in Academic Writing [48.33722012818687]
  ChatGPT, a question-answering system released by OpenAI in November 2022, has demonstrated a range of capabilities that could be utilised in producing academic papers. This raises critical questions surrounding the concept of authorship in academia. We propose a framework we name "PaperCard", a documentation for human authors to transparently declare the use of AI in their writing process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-07T14:28:04Z)
• A LLM Assisted Exploitation of AI-Guardian [57.572998144258705]
  We evaluate the robustness of AI-Guardian, a recent defense to adversarial examples published at IEEE S&P 2023. We write none of the code to attack this model, and instead prompt GPT-4 to implement all attack algorithms following our instructions and guidance. This process was surprisingly effective and efficient, with the language model at times producing code from ambiguous instructions faster than the author of this paper could have done.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T17:33:25Z)
• The Future of AI-Assisted Writing [0.0]
  We conduct a comparative user-study between such tools from an information retrieval lens: pull and push. Our findings show that users welcome seamless assistance of AI in their writing. Users also enjoyed the collaboration with AI-assisted writing tools and did not feel a lack of ownership.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-29T02:46:45Z)
• Generative AI: Implications and Applications for Education [0.0]
  The launch of ChatGPT in November 2022 precipitated a panic among some educators while prompting qualified enthusiasm from others. Under the umbrella term Generative AI, ChatGPT is an example of a range of technologies for the delivery of computer-generated text, image, and other digitized media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-12T16:52:38Z)
• AI Usage Cards: Responsibly Reporting AI-generated Content [25.848910414962337]
  Given AI systems like ChatGPT can generate content that is indistinguishable from human-made work, the responsible use of this technology is a growing concern. We propose a three-dimensional model consisting of transparency, integrity, and accountability to define the responsible use of AI. Second, we introduce AI Usage Cards'', a standardized way to report the use of AI in scientific research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T08:41:31Z)
• Effidit: Your AI Writing Assistant [60.588370965898534]
  Effidit is a digital writing assistant that facilitates users to write higher-quality text more efficiently by using artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. In Effidit, we significantly expand the capacities of a writing assistant by providing functions in five categories: text completion, error checking, text polishing, keywords to sentences (K2S), and cloud input methods (cloud IME)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-03T02:24:45Z)
• MONAI Label: A framework for AI-assisted Interactive Labeling of 3D Medical Images [49.664220687980006]
  The lack of annotated datasets is a major bottleneck for training new task-specific supervised machine learning models. We present MONAI Label, a free and open-source framework that facilitates the development of applications based on artificial intelligence (AI) models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-23T12:33:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.