Improved Active Learning via Dependent Leverage Score Sampling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04966v2
• Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 12:33:32 GMT
• Title: Improved Active Learning via Dependent Leverage Score Sampling
• Authors: Atsushi Shimizu, Xiaoou Cheng, Christopher Musco, Jonathan Weare,
• Abstract summary: We show how to obtain improved active learning methods in the agnostic (adversarial noise) setting. We propose an easily implemented method based on the emphpivotal sampling algorithm In comparison to independent sampling, our method reduces the number of samples needed to reach a given target accuracy by up to $50%$.
• Score: 8.400581768343804
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We show how to obtain improved active learning methods in the agnostic (adversarial noise) setting by combining marginal leverage score sampling with non-independent sampling strategies that promote spatial coverage. In particular, we propose an easily implemented method based on the \emph{pivotal sampling algorithm}, which we test on problems motivated by learning-based methods for parametric PDEs and uncertainty quantification. In comparison to independent sampling, our method reduces the number of samples needed to reach a given target accuracy by up to $50\%$. We support our findings with two theoretical results. First, we show that any non-independent leverage score sampling method that obeys a weak \emph{one-sided $\ell_{\infty}$ independence condition} (which includes pivotal sampling) can actively learn $d$ dimensional linear functions with $O(d\log d)$ samples, matching independent sampling. This result extends recent work on matrix Chernoff bounds under $\ell_{\infty}$ independence, and may be of interest for analyzing other sampling strategies beyond pivotal sampling. Second, we show that, for the important case of polynomial regression, our pivotal method obtains an improved bound on $O(d)$ samples.

Related papers

• Revisiting Score Function Estimators for $k$-Subset Sampling [5.464421236280698]
  We show how to efficiently compute the $k$-subset distribution's score function using a discrete Fourier transform. The resulting estimator provides both exact samples and unbiased gradient estimates. Experiments in feature selection show results competitive with current methods, despite weaker assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T21:26:39Z)
• Faster Diffusion Sampling with Randomized Midpoints: Sequential and Parallel [10.840582511203024]
  We show that our algorithm can be parallelized to run in only $widetilde O(log2 d)$ parallel rounds. We also show that our algorithm can be parallelized to run in only $widetilde O(log2 d)$ parallel rounds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T01:34:34Z)
• Data-Efficient Learning via Clustering-Based Sensitivity Sampling: Foundation Models and Beyond [28.651041302245538]
  We present a new data selection approach based on $k$-means clustering and sampling sensitivity. We show how it can be applied on linear regression, leading to a new sampling strategy that surprisingly matches the performances of leverage score sampling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T09:03:43Z)
• On-Demand Sampling: Learning Optimally from Multiple Distributions [63.20009081099896]
  Social and real-world considerations have given rise to multi-distribution learning paradigms. We establish the optimal sample complexity of these learning paradigms and give algorithms that meet this sample complexity. Our algorithm design and analysis are enabled by our extensions of online learning techniques for solving zero-sum games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-22T19:07:26Z)
• Adaptive Sketches for Robust Regression with Importance Sampling [64.75899469557272]
  We introduce data structures for solving robust regression through gradient descent (SGD) Our algorithm effectively runs $T$ steps of SGD with importance sampling while using sublinear space and just making a single pass over the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-16T03:09:30Z)
• Towards Sample-Optimal Compressive Phase Retrieval with Sparse and Generative Priors [59.33977545294148]
  We show that $O(k log L)$ samples suffice to guarantee that the signal is close to any vector that minimizes an amplitude-based empirical loss function. We adapt this result to sparse phase retrieval, and show that $O(s log n)$ samples are sufficient for a similar guarantee when the underlying signal is $s$-sparse and $n$-dimensional.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-29T12:49:54Z)
• Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation from Multiple Logging Policies [77.62012545592233]
  We study off-policy evaluation from multiple logging policies, each generating a dataset of fixed size, i.e., stratified sampling. We find the OPE estimator for multiple loggers with minimum variance for any instance, i.e., the efficient one.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-21T13:43:48Z)
• A Provably Efficient Sample Collection Strategy for Reinforcement Learning [123.69175280309226]
  One of the challenges in online reinforcement learning (RL) is that the agent needs to trade off the exploration of the environment and the exploitation of the samples to optimize its behavior. We propose to tackle the exploration-exploitation problem following a decoupled approach composed of: 1) An "objective-specific" algorithm that prescribes how many samples to collect at which states, as if it has access to a generative model (i.e., sparse simulator of the environment); 2) An "objective-agnostic" sample collection responsible for generating the prescribed samples as fast as possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-13T15:17:35Z)
• Learning Entangled Single-Sample Distributions via Iterative Trimming [28.839136703139225]
  We analyze a simple and computationally efficient method based on iteratively trimming samples and re-estimating the parameter on the trimmed sample set. We show that the method in logarithmic iterations outputs an estimation whose error only depends on the noise level of the $lceil alpha n rceil$-th noisiest data point.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T18:37:43Z)
• The Simulator: Understanding Adaptive Sampling in the Moderate-Confidence Regime [52.38455827779212]
  We propose a novel technique for analyzing adaptive sampling called the em Simulator. We prove the first instance-based lower bounds the top-k problem which incorporate the appropriate log-factors. Our new analysis inspires a simple and near-optimal for the best-arm and top-k identification, the first em practical of its kind for the latter problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2017-02-16T23:42:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.