Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is: Evaluating Strategic Planning and Execution of LLM Agents in an Auction Arena
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.05746v3
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 03:37:56 GMT
- Title: Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is: Evaluating Strategic Planning and Execution of LLM Agents in an Auction Arena
- Authors: Jiangjie Chen, Siyu Yuan, Rong Ye, Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Kyle Richardson,
- Abstract summary: We introduce AucArena, a novel evaluation suite that simulates auctions.
We conduct controlled experiments using state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) to power bidding agents to benchmark their planning and execution skills.
- Score: 25.865825113847404
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) showcase advanced reasoning, yet NLP evaluations often depend on static benchmarks. Evaluating this necessitates environments that test strategic reasoning in dynamic, competitive scenarios requiring long-term planning. We introduce AucArena, a novel evaluation suite that simulates auctions, a setting chosen for being highly unpredictable and involving many skills related to resource and risk management, while also being easy to evaluate. We conduct controlled experiments using state-of-the-art LLMs to power bidding agents to benchmark their planning and execution skills. Our research demonstrates that LLMs, such as GPT-4, possess key skills for auction participation, such as budget management and goal adherence, which improve with adaptive strategies. This highlights LLMs' potential in modeling complex social interactions in competitive contexts. However, variability in LLM performance and occasional outperformance by simpler methods indicate opportunities for further advancements in LLM design and the value of our simulation environment for ongoing testing and refinement.
Related papers
- Q*: Improving Multi-step Reasoning for LLMs with Deliberative Planning [53.6472920229013]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability in many natural language tasks.
LLMs are prone to produce errors, hallucinations and inconsistent statements when performing multi-step reasoning.
We introduce Q*, a framework for guiding LLMs decoding process with deliberative planning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T13:08:09Z) - Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More? [54.667202878390526]
Long-context language models (LCLMs) have the potential to revolutionize our approach to tasks traditionally reliant on external tools like retrieval systems or databases.
We introduce LOFT, a benchmark of real-world tasks requiring context up to millions of tokens designed to evaluate LCLMs' performance on in-context retrieval and reasoning.
Our findings reveal LCLMs' surprising ability to rival state-of-the-art retrieval and RAG systems, despite never having been explicitly trained for these tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-19T00:28:58Z) - A Survey of Useful LLM Evaluation [20.048914787813263]
Two-stage framework: from core ability'' to agent''
In the "core ability" stage, we discussed the reasoning ability, societal impact, and domain knowledge of LLMs.
In the agent'' stage, we demonstrated embodied action, planning, and tool learning of LLMs agent applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-03T02:20:03Z) - STRIDE: A Tool-Assisted LLM Agent Framework for Strategic and Interactive Decision-Making [43.734386326024016]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, showing remarkable linguistic proficiency and reasoning capabilities.
This paper presents a novel framework equipped with memory and specialized tools to enhance their strategic decision-making capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-25T23:25:10Z) - K-Level Reasoning with Large Language Models [80.13817747270029]
We explore the dynamic reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) for decision-making in rapidly evolving environments.
We introduce two game theory-based pilot challenges that mirror the complexities of real-world dynamic decision-making.
These challenges are well-defined, enabling clear, controllable, and precise evaluation of LLMs' dynamic reasoning abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-02T16:07:05Z) - Can Large Language Models be Trusted for Evaluation? Scalable
Meta-Evaluation of LLMs as Evaluators via Agent Debate [74.06294042304415]
We propose ScaleEval, an agent-debate-assisted meta-evaluation framework.
We release the code for our framework, which is publicly available on GitHub.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-30T07:03:32Z) - Through the Lens of Core Competency: Survey on Evaluation of Large
Language Models [27.271533306818732]
Large language model (LLM) has excellent performance and wide practical uses.
Existing evaluation tasks are difficult to keep up with the wide range of applications in real-world scenarios.
We summarize 4 core competencies of LLM, including reasoning, knowledge, reliability, and safety.
Under this competency architecture, similar tasks are combined to reflect corresponding ability, while new tasks can also be easily added into the system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-15T17:40:34Z) - AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents [88.45506148281379]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly smart and autonomous, targeting real-world pragmatic missions beyond traditional NLP tasks.
We present AgentBench, a benchmark that currently consists of 8 distinct environments to assess LLM-as-Agent's reasoning and decision-making abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-07T16:08:11Z) - On Learning to Summarize with Large Language Models as References [101.79795027550959]
Large language models (LLMs) are favored by human annotators over the original reference summaries in commonly used summarization datasets.
We study an LLM-as-reference learning setting for smaller text summarization models to investigate whether their performance can be substantially improved.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T16:56:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.