Identity Collapse? Realignment of Taiwanese Voters in the 2024 Presidential Elections on Social Media

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.07739v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 17:52:27 GMT
• Title: Identity Collapse? Realignment of Taiwanese Voters in the 2024 Presidential Elections on Social Media
• Authors: Ho-Chun Herbert Chang, Sunny Fang
• Abstract summary: The 2024 Taiwanese Presidential Election is not just a critical geopolitical event, it also engages with long-standing debate in politics. We analyze user (predominantly Taiwanese) discourse and engagement along the axes of national identity, issue topic, and partisan alignment. We discuss how the dissolution of Taiwan's single-issue society may not just lead to more viable candidates and multi-issue discourse, but the misalignment of national and partisan identity may heal deep-seated partisan cleavages.
• Score: 2.5835347022640254
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The 2024 Taiwanese Presidential Election is not just a critical geopolitical event, it also engages with long-standing debate in politics regarding the factors that lead to the rise of new political parties and candidates. In 2021, the Economist called Taiwan "the most dangerous place on earth" due to its critical role in a fragile supply chain. Additionally, a four-candidate race has emerged in a traditionally bipartisan election which begs the question: how will voters realign given the choice of four candidates? Leveraging more than a million posts on social media, we analyze user (predominantly Taiwanese) discourse and engagement along the axes of national identity, issue topic, and partisan alignment. Results reveal alternative candidates (Ko and Gou) draw attention from the fringes rather than the center relative to national identity, and traditional candidates derive more engagement from the traditional media and salience to geopolitical issues. Crucially, in-group references generate more engagement than out-group references, contrary to Western-based studies. We discuss how the dissolution of Taiwan's single-issue society may not just lead to more viable candidates and multi-issue discourse, but the misalignment of national and partisan identity may heal deep-seated partisan cleavages.

Related papers

• Analyzing political stances on Twitter in the lead-up to the 2024 U.S. election [1.2764774886497106]
  We investigate the ideological positioning of tweets related to the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election. We classify ideological stances into Pro-Democrat, Anti-Republican, Pro-Republican, Anti-Democrat, and Neutral categories. We find that Republican candidates author significantly more tweets in criticism of the Democratic party and its candidates than vice versa.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-28T07:05:34Z)
• Finding Hidden Swing Voters in the 2022 Italian Elections Twitter Discourse [1.3654846342364308]
  We examine the dynamics of political messaging and voter behavior on Twitter during the 2022 Italian general elections. Our analysis reveals that during election periods, the popularity of politicians increases, and there is a notable variation in the use of persuasive language techniques. Swing voters are more vulnerable to these propaganda techniques compared to non-swing voters, with differences in vulnerability patterns across various types of political shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T13:34:29Z)
• Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies: Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
  We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings. We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z)
• Social media polarization reflects shifting political alliances in Pakistan [44.99833362998488]
  Spanning from 2018 to 2022, our analysis of Twitter data allows us to capture pivotal shifts and developments in Pakistan's political arena. By examining interactions and content generated by politicians affiliated with major political parties, we reveal a consistent and active presence of politicians on Twitter. Our analysis also uncovers significant shifts in political affiliations, including the transition of politicians to the opposition alliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T00:07:48Z)
• Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S. News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
  We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022. We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs. Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z)
• Computational Assessment of Hyperpartisanship in News Titles [55.92100606666497]
  We first adopt a human-guided machine learning framework to develop a new dataset for hyperpartisan news title detection. Overall the Right media tends to use proportionally more hyperpartisan titles. We identify three major topics including foreign issues, political systems, and societal issues that are suggestive of hyperpartisanship in news titles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-16T05:56:58Z)
• Understanding Political Polarisation using Language Models: A dataset and method [18.40891764492186]
  This paper aims to analyze political polarization in US political system using Language Models. Our main contributions are a dataset extracted from Wikipedia that spans the past 120 years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-02T22:15:04Z)
• Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S. Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
  We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections. Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections. 75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z)
• Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online political polarization [58.720142291102135]
  A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations. This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.