Affective Polarization Amongst Swedish Politicians
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16193v2
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 11:50:08 GMT
- Title: Affective Polarization Amongst Swedish Politicians
- Authors: François t'Serstevens, Roberto Cerina, Gustav Peper,
- Abstract summary: This study investigates affective polarization among Swedish politicians on Twitter from 2021 to 2023.<n>Negative partisanship becomes significantly more dominant when the in-group is defined at the party level.<n>Negative partisanship also proves to be a strategic choice for online visibility, attracting 3.18 more likes and 1.69 more retweets on average.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This study investigates affective polarization among Swedish politicians on Twitter from 2021 to 2023, including the September 2022 parliamentary election. Analyzing over 25,000 tweets and employing large language models (LLMs) for sentiment and political classification, we distinguish between positive partisanship (support of allies) and negative partisanship (criticism of opponents). Our findings are contingent on the definition of the in-group. When political in-groups are defined at the ideological bloc level, negative and positive partisanship occur at similar rates. However, when the in-group is defined at the party level, negative partisanship becomes significantly more dominant and is 1.51 times more likely (1.45, 1.58). This effect is even stronger among extreme politicians, who engage in negativity more than their moderate counterparts. Negative partisanship also proves to be a strategic choice for online visibility, attracting 3.18 more likes and 1.69 more retweets on average. By adapting methods developed for two-party systems and leveraging LLMs for Swedish-language analysis, we provide novel insights into how multiparty politics shapes polarizing discourse. Our results underscore both the strategic appeal of negativity in digital spaces and the growing potential of LLMs for large-scale, non-English political research.
Related papers
- Analyzing political stances on Twitter in the lead-up to the 2024 U.S. election [1.2764774886497106]
We investigate the ideological positioning of tweets related to the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election.<n>We classify ideological stances into Pro-Democrat, Anti-Republican, Pro-Republican, Anti-Democrat, and Neutral categories.<n>We find that Republican candidates author significantly more tweets in criticism of the Democratic party and its candidates than vice versa.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-28T07:05:34Z) - When Neutral Summaries are not that Neutral: Quantifying Political Neutrality in LLM-Generated News Summaries [0.0]
This study presents a fresh perspective on quantifying the political neutrality of LLMs.
We consider five pressing issues in current US politics: abortion, gun control/rights, healthcare, immigration, and LGBTQ+ rights.
Our study reveals a consistent trend towards pro-Democratic biases in several well-known LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-13T19:44:39Z) - Representation Bias in Political Sample Simulations with Large Language Models [54.48283690603358]
This study seeks to identify and quantify biases in simulating political samples with Large Language Models.
Using the GPT-3.5-Turbo model, we leverage data from the American National Election Studies, German Longitudinal Election Study, Zuobiao dataset, and China Family Panel Studies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T05:52:26Z) - Whose Side Are You On? Investigating the Political Stance of Large Language Models [56.883423489203786]
We investigate the political orientation of Large Language Models (LLMs) across a spectrum of eight polarizing topics.
Our investigation delves into the political alignment of LLMs across a spectrum of eight polarizing topics, spanning from abortion to LGBTQ issues.
The findings suggest that users should be mindful when crafting queries, and exercise caution in selecting neutral prompt language.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-15T04:02:24Z) - Generalizing Political Leaning Inference to Multi-Party Systems:
Insights from the UK Political Landscape [10.798766768721741]
An ability to infer the political leaning of social media users can help in gathering opinion polls.
We release a dataset comprising users labelled by their political leaning as well as interactions with one another.
We show that interactions in the form of retweets between users can be a very powerful feature to enable political leaning inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-04T09:02:17Z) - Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect? [88.35520051971538]
We investigate the opinions reflected by language models (LMs) by leveraging high-quality public opinion polls and their associated human responses.
We find substantial misalignment between the views reflected by current LMs and those of US demographic groups.
Our analysis confirms prior observations about the left-leaning tendencies of some human feedback-tuned LMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-30T17:17:08Z) - Millions of Co-purchases and Reviews Reveal the Spread of Polarization
and Lifestyle Politics across Online Markets [68.8204255655161]
We study the pervasiveness of polarization and lifestyle politics over different product segments in a diverse market.
We sample 234.6 million relations among 21.8 million market entities to find product categories that are politically relevant, aligned, and polarized.
Cultural products are 4 times more polarized than any other segment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-17T18:16:37Z) - Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S.
Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections.
Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections.
75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z) - Perspective-taking to Reduce Affective Polarization on Social Media [11.379010432760241]
We deploy a randomized field experiment through a browser extension to 1,611 participants on Twitter.
We find that simply exposing participants to "outgroup" feeds enhances engagement, but not an understanding of why others hold their political views.
framing the experience in familiar, empathic terms by prompting participants to recall a disagreement does not affect engagement, but does increase their ability to understand opposing views.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-11T20:25:10Z) - Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online
political polarization [58.720142291102135]
A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations.
This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.