Dependency Practices for Vulnerability Mitigation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.07847v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 19:48:46 GMT
• Title: Dependency Practices for Vulnerability Mitigation
• Authors: Abbas Javan Jafari, Diego Elias Costa, Ahmad Abdellatif, Emad Shihab
• Abstract summary: We analyze more than 450 vulnerabilities in the npm ecosystem to understand why dependent packages remain vulnerable. We identify over 200,000 npm packages that are infected through their dependencies. We use 9 features to build a prediction model that identifies packages that quickly adopt the vulnerability fix and prevent further propagation of vulnerabilities.
• Score: 4.710141711181836
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Relying on dependency packages accelerates software development, but it also increases the exposure to security vulnerabilities that may be present in dependencies. While developers have full control over which dependency packages (and which version) they use, they have no control over the dependencies of their dependencies. Such transitive dependencies, which often amount to a greater number than direct dependencies, can become infected with vulnerabilities and put software projects at risk. To mitigate this risk, Practitioners need to select dependencies that respond quickly to vulnerabilities to prevent the propagation of vulnerable code to their project. To identify such dependencies, we analyze more than 450 vulnerabilities in the npm ecosystem to understand why dependent packages remain vulnerable. We identify over 200,000 npm packages that are infected through their dependencies and use 9 features to build a prediction model that identifies packages that quickly adopt the vulnerability fix and prevent further propagation of vulnerabilities. We also study the relationship between these features and the response speed of vulnerable packages. We complement our work with a practitioner survey to understand the applicability of our findings. Developers can incorporate our findings into their dependency management practices to mitigate the impact of vulnerabilities from their dependency supply chain.

Related papers

• Pinning Is Futile: You Need More Than Local Dependency Versioning to Defend against Supply Chain Attacks [23.756533975349985]
  Recent high-profile incidents in open-source software have raised practitioner attention on software supply chain attacks. Security practitioners advocate pinning dependency to specific versions rather than floating in version ranges. We quantify, through counterfactual analysis and simulations, the security and maintenance impact of version constraints in the npm ecosystem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T16:50:48Z)
• Tracing Vulnerabilities in Maven: A Study of CVE lifecycles and Dependency Networks [0.46040036610482665]
  This study analyzes the lifecycle of 3,362 CVEs in Maven to uncover patterns in vulnerability mitigation and identify factors influencing at-risk packages. A key finding reveals a trend in "Publish-Before-Patch" scenarios: maintainers prioritize patching severe vulnerabilities more quickly after public disclosure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T02:43:35Z)
• Discovery of Timeline and Crowd Reaction of Software Vulnerability Disclosures [47.435076500269545]
  Apache Log4J was found to be vulnerable to remote code execution attacks. More than 35,000 packages were forced to update their Log4J libraries with the latest version. It is practically reasonable for software developers to update their third-party libraries whenever the software vendors have released a vulnerable-free version.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T01:55:51Z)
• An Overview and Catalogue of Dependency Challenges in Open Source Software Package Registries [52.23798016734889]
  This article provides a catalogue of dependency-related challenges that come with relying on OSS packages or libraries. The catalogue is based on the scientific literature on empirical research that has been conducted to understand, quantify and overcome these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T16:20:20Z)
• The Impact of SBOM Generators on Vulnerability Assessment in Python: A Comparison and a Novel Approach [56.4040698609393]
  Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) has been promoted as a tool to increase transparency and verifiability in software composition. Current SBOM generation tools often suffer from inaccuracies in identifying components and dependencies. We propose PIP-sbom, a novel pip-inspired solution that addresses their shortcomings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T10:12:37Z)
• Trust, but Verify: Evaluating Developer Behavior in Mitigating Security Vulnerabilities in Open-Source Software Projects [0.11999555634662631]
  This study investigates vulnerabilities in dependencies of sampled open-source software (OSS) projects. We have identified common issues in outdated or unmaintained dependencies, that pose significant security risks. Results suggest that reducing the number of direct dependencies and prioritizing well-established libraries with strong security records are effective strategies for enhancing the software security landscape.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-26T13:46:48Z)
• See to Believe: Using Visualization To Motivate Updating Third-party Dependencies [1.7914660044009358]
  Security vulnerabilities introduced by applications using third-party dependencies are on the increase. Developers are wary of library updates, even to fix vulnerabilities, citing that being unaware, or that the migration effort to update outweighs the decision. In this paper, we hypothesize that the dependency graph visualization (DGV) approach will motivate developers to update.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-15T03:57:27Z)
• Empirical Analysis of Vulnerabilities Life Cycle in Golang Ecosystem [0.773844059806915]
  A comprehensive investigation was undertaken to examine the life cycle of vulnerability in Golang. It turned out that 66.10% of modules in the Golang ecosystem were affected by vulnerabilities. By analyzing reasons behind non-lagged and lagged vulnerabilities, timely releasing and indexing patch versions could significantly enhance ecosystem security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-31T14:53:51Z)
• Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models [79.0183835295533]
  We introduce the first benchmark for indirect prompt injection attacks, named BIPIA, to assess the risk of such vulnerabilities. Our analysis identifies two key factors contributing to their success: LLMs' inability to distinguish between informational context and actionable instructions, and their lack of awareness in avoiding the execution of instructions within external content. We propose two novel defense mechanisms-boundary awareness and explicit reminder-to address these vulnerabilities in both black-box and white-box settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T01:08:39Z)
• Analyzing Maintenance Activities of Software Libraries [65.268245109828]
  Industrial applications heavily integrate open-source software libraries nowadays. I want to introduce an automatic monitoring approach for industrial applications to identify open-source dependencies that show negative signs regarding their current or future maintenance activities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T16:51:25Z)
• On the Security Blind Spots of Software Composition Analysis [46.1389163921338]
  We present a novel approach to detect vulnerable clones in the Maven repository. We retrieve over 53k potential vulnerable clones from Maven Central. We detect 727 confirmed vulnerable clones and synthesize a testable proof-of-vulnerability project for each of those.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T20:14:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.