Out of Sight, Still at Risk: The Lifecycle of Transitive Vulnerabilities in Maven

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.04803v1
• Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 07:54:15 GMT
• Title: Out of Sight, Still at Risk: The Lifecycle of Transitive Vulnerabilities in Maven
• Authors: Piotr Przymus, Mikołaj Fejzer, Jakub Narębski, Krzysztof Rykaczewski, Krzysztof Stencel,
• Abstract summary: Transitive vulnerabilities that arise from indirect dependencies expose projects to risks associated with Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures.<n>We employ survival analysis to measure the time projects remain exposed after a CVE is introduced.<n>Using a large dataset of Maven projects, we identify factors that influence the resolution of these vulnerabilities.
• Score: 0.3670008893193884
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The modern software development landscape heavily relies on transitive dependencies. They enable seamless integration of third-party libraries. However, they also introduce security challenges. Transitive vulnerabilities that arise from indirect dependencies expose projects to risks associated with Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs). It happens even when direct dependencies remain secure. This paper examines the lifecycle of transitive vulnerabilities in the Maven ecosystem. We employ survival analysis to measure the time projects remain exposed after a CVE is introduced. Using a large dataset of Maven projects, we identify factors that influence the resolution of these vulnerabilities. Our findings offer practical advice on improving dependency management.

Related papers

• The Ripple Effect of Vulnerabilities in Maven Central: Prevalence, Propagation, and Mitigation Challenges [8.955037553566774]
  We analyze the prevalence and impact of vulnerabilities within the Maven Central ecosystem using Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures data. In our subsample of around 4 million releases, we found that while only about 1% of releases have direct vulnerabilities. We also observed that the time taken to patch vulnerabilities, including those of high or critical severity, often spans several years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T13:45:27Z)
• Understanding Software Vulnerabilities in the Maven Ecosystem: Patterns, Timelines, and Risks [1.5499426028105905]
  This paper presents a large-scale analysis of vulnerabilities in the Maven ecosystem using the Goblin framework.<n>We identify 77,393 vulnerable releases with 226 unique CWEs.<n>On average, vulnerabilities take nearly half a decade to be documented and 4.4 years to be resolved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T12:52:07Z)
• Decoding Dependency Risks: A Quantitative Study of Vulnerabilities in the Maven Ecosystem [1.5499426028105905]
  This study investigates vulnerabilities within the Maven ecosystem by analyzing a comprehensive dataset of 14,459,139 releases.<n>We show risky weaknesses, those unique to Maven, and emphasize those becoming increasingly dangerous over time.<n>Our findings suggest that improper handling of input and mismanagement of resources pose the most risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T04:16:46Z)
• Tracing Vulnerabilities in Maven: A Study of CVE lifecycles and Dependency Networks [0.46040036610482665]
  This study analyzes the lifecycle of 3,362 CVEs in Maven to uncover patterns in vulnerability mitigation and identify factors influencing at-risk packages.<n>A key finding reveals a trend in "Publish-Before-Patch" scenarios: maintainers prioritize patching severe vulnerabilities more quickly after public disclosure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T02:43:35Z)
• Breaking Focus: Contextual Distraction Curse in Large Language Models [68.4534308805202]
  We investigate a critical vulnerability in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>This phenomenon arises when models fail to maintain consistent performance on questions modified with semantically coherent but irrelevant context.<n>We propose an efficient tree-based search methodology to automatically generate CDV examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T18:43:36Z)
• The Impact of SBOM Generators on Vulnerability Assessment in Python: A Comparison and a Novel Approach [56.4040698609393]
  Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) has been promoted as a tool to increase transparency and verifiability in software composition. Current SBOM generation tools often suffer from inaccuracies in identifying components and dependencies. We propose PIP-sbom, a novel pip-inspired solution that addresses their shortcomings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T10:12:37Z)
• Detectors for Safe and Reliable LLMs: Implementations, Uses, and Limitations [76.19419888353586]
  Large language models (LLMs) are susceptible to a variety of risks, from non-faithful output to biased and toxic generations. We present our efforts to create and deploy a library of detectors: compact and easy-to-build classification models that provide labels for various harms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-09T21:07:16Z)
• Dependency Practices for Vulnerability Mitigation [4.710141711181836]
  We analyze more than 450 vulnerabilities in the npm ecosystem to understand why dependent packages remain vulnerable. We identify over 200,000 npm packages that are infected through their dependencies. We use 9 features to build a prediction model that identifies packages that quickly adopt the vulnerability fix and prevent further propagation of vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T19:48:46Z)
• Safety Margins for Reinforcement Learning [53.10194953873209]
  We show how to leverage proxy criticality metrics to generate safety margins. We evaluate our approach on learned policies from APE-X and A3C within an Atari environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T16:49:54Z)
• Analyzing Maintenance Activities of Software Libraries [65.268245109828]
  Industrial applications heavily integrate open-source software libraries nowadays. I want to introduce an automatic monitoring approach for industrial applications to identify open-source dependencies that show negative signs regarding their current or future maintenance activities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T16:51:25Z)
• On the Security Blind Spots of Software Composition Analysis [46.1389163921338]
  We present a novel approach to detect vulnerable clones in the Maven repository. We retrieve over 53k potential vulnerable clones from Maven Central. We detect 727 confirmed vulnerable clones and synthesize a testable proof-of-vulnerability project for each of those.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T20:14:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.