The Ripple Effect of Vulnerabilities in Maven Central: Prevalence, Propagation, and Mitigation Challenges

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.04175v1
• Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 13:45:27 GMT
• Title: The Ripple Effect of Vulnerabilities in Maven Central: Prevalence, Propagation, and Mitigation Challenges
• Authors: Ehtisham Ul Haq, Song Wang, Robert S. Allison,
• Abstract summary: We analyze the prevalence and impact of vulnerabilities within the Maven Central ecosystem using Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures data.<n>In our subsample of around 4 million releases, we found that while only about 1% of releases have direct vulnerabilities.<n>We also observed that the time taken to patch vulnerabilities, including those of high or critical severity, often spans several years.
• Score: 8.955037553566774
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The widespread use of package managers like Maven has accelerated software development but has also introduced significant security risks due to vulnerabilities in dependencies. In this study, we analyze the prevalence and impact of vulnerabilities within the Maven Central ecosystem, using Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) data from OSV.dev and a subsample enriched with aggregated CVE data (CVE_AGGREGATED), which captures both direct and transitive vulnerabilities. In our subsample of around 4 million releases, we found that while only about 1% of releases have direct vulnerabilities, approximately 46.8% are affected by transitive vulnerabilities. This highlights how a small number of vulnerable yet influential artifacts can impact a vast portion of the ecosystem. Moreover, our analysis shows that vulnerabilities propagate rapidly through dependency networks and that more central artifacts (those with a high number of dependents) are not necessarily less vulnerable. We also observed that the time taken to patch vulnerabilities, including those of high or critical severity, often spans several years. Additionally, we found that dependents of artifacts tend to prefer presumably non-vulnerable versions; however, some continue to use vulnerable versions, indicating challenges in adopting patched releases. These findings highlight the critical need for improved dependency management practices and timely vulnerability remediation to enhance the security of software ecosystems.

Related papers

• Understanding Software Vulnerabilities in the Maven Ecosystem: Patterns, Timelines, and Risks [1.5499426028105905]
  This paper presents a large-scale analysis of vulnerabilities in the Maven ecosystem using the Goblin framework.<n>We identify 77,393 vulnerable releases with 226 unique CWEs.<n>On average, vulnerabilities take nearly half a decade to be documented and 4.4 years to be resolved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T12:52:07Z)
• Decoding Dependency Risks: A Quantitative Study of Vulnerabilities in the Maven Ecosystem [1.5499426028105905]
  This study investigates vulnerabilities within the Maven ecosystem by analyzing a comprehensive dataset of 14,459,139 releases.<n>We show risky weaknesses, those unique to Maven, and emphasize those becoming increasingly dangerous over time.<n>Our findings suggest that improper handling of input and mismanagement of resources pose the most risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T04:16:46Z)
• Tracing Vulnerabilities in Maven: A Study of CVE lifecycles and Dependency Networks [0.46040036610482665]
  This study analyzes the lifecycle of 3,362 CVEs in Maven to uncover patterns in vulnerability mitigation and identify factors influencing at-risk packages.<n>A key finding reveals a trend in "Publish-Before-Patch" scenarios: maintainers prioritize patching severe vulnerabilities more quickly after public disclosure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T02:43:35Z)
• Discovery of Timeline and Crowd Reaction of Software Vulnerability Disclosures [47.435076500269545]
  Apache Log4J was found to be vulnerable to remote code execution attacks. More than 35,000 packages were forced to update their Log4J libraries with the latest version. It is practically reasonable for software developers to update their third-party libraries whenever the software vendors have released a vulnerable-free version.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T01:55:51Z)
• The Impact of SBOM Generators on Vulnerability Assessment in Python: A Comparison and a Novel Approach [56.4040698609393]
  Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) has been promoted as a tool to increase transparency and verifiability in software composition. Current SBOM generation tools often suffer from inaccuracies in identifying components and dependencies. We propose PIP-sbom, a novel pip-inspired solution that addresses their shortcomings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T10:12:37Z)
• Profile of Vulnerability Remediations in Dependencies Using Graph Analysis [40.35284812745255]
  This research introduces graph analysis methods and a modified Graph Attention Convolutional Neural Network (GAT) model. We analyze control flow graphs to profile breaking changes in applications occurring from dependency upgrades intended to remediate vulnerabilities. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of the enhanced GAT model in offering nuanced insights into the relational dynamics of code vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T02:01:47Z)
• SliceLocator: Locating Vulnerable Statements with Graph-based Detectors [33.395068754566935]
  SliceLocator identifies the most relevant taint flow by selecting the highest-weighted flow path from all potential vulnerability-triggering statements.<n>We demonstrate that SliceLocator consistently performs well on four state-of-the-art GNN-based vulnerability detectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-05T10:15:04Z)
• Empirical Analysis of Vulnerabilities Life Cycle in Golang Ecosystem [0.773844059806915]
  A comprehensive investigation was undertaken to examine the life cycle of vulnerability in Golang. It turned out that 66.10% of modules in the Golang ecosystem were affected by vulnerabilities. By analyzing reasons behind non-lagged and lagged vulnerabilities, timely releasing and indexing patch versions could significantly enhance ecosystem security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-31T14:53:51Z)
• Dependency Practices for Vulnerability Mitigation [4.710141711181836]
  We analyze more than 450 vulnerabilities in the npm ecosystem to understand why dependent packages remain vulnerable. We identify over 200,000 npm packages that are infected through their dependencies. We use 9 features to build a prediction model that identifies packages that quickly adopt the vulnerability fix and prevent further propagation of vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T19:48:46Z)
• REEF: A Framework for Collecting Real-World Vulnerabilities and Fixes [40.401211102969356]
  We propose an automated collecting framework REEF to collect REal-world vulnErabilities and Fixes from open-source repositories. We develop a multi-language crawler to collect vulnerabilities and their fixes, and design metrics to filter for high-quality vulnerability-fix pairs. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our approach can collect high-quality vulnerability-fix pairs and generate strong explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T02:50:08Z)
• On the Security Blind Spots of Software Composition Analysis [46.1389163921338]
  We present a novel approach to detect vulnerable clones in the Maven repository. We retrieve over 53k potential vulnerable clones from Maven Central. We detect 727 confirmed vulnerable clones and synthesize a testable proof-of-vulnerability project for each of those.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T20:14:46Z)
• VELVET: a noVel Ensemble Learning approach to automatically locate VulnErable sTatements [62.93814803258067]
  This paper presents VELVET, a novel ensemble learning approach to locate vulnerable statements in source code. Our model combines graph-based and sequence-based neural networks to successfully capture the local and global context of a program graph. VELVET achieves 99.6% and 43.6% top-1 accuracy over synthetic data and real-world data, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T22:45:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.