An Impact and Risk Assessment Framework for National Electronic Identity (eID) Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.15784v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:33:10 GMT
• Title: An Impact and Risk Assessment Framework for National Electronic Identity (eID) Systems
• Authors: Jide Edu, Mark Hooper, Carsten Maple, Jon Crowcroft,
• Abstract summary: We propose a framework that considers a wide range of factors, including the social, economic, and political contexts. This provides a holistic platform for a better assessment of risk to the eID system.
• Score: 8.93312157123729
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Electronic identification (eID) systems allow citizens to assert and authenticate their identities for various purposes, such as accessing government services or conducting financial transactions. These systems improve user access to rights, services, and the formal economy. As eID systems become an essential facet of national development, any failure, compromise, or misuse can be costly and damaging to the government, users, and society. Therefore, an effective risk assessment is vital for identifying emerging risks to the system and assessing their impact. However, developing a comprehensive risk assessment for these systems must extend far beyond focusing on technical security and privacy impacts and must be conducted with a contextual understanding of stakeholders and the communities these systems serve. In this study, we posit that current risk assessments do not address risk factors for all key stakeholders and explore how potential compromise could impact them each in turn. In the examination of the broader impact of risks and the potentially significant consequences for stakeholders, we propose a framework that considers a wide range of factors, including the social, economic, and political contexts in which these systems were implemented. This provides a holistic platform for a better assessment of risk to the eID system.

Related papers

• A Human-Centered Risk Evaluation of Biometric Systems Using Conjoint Analysis [0.6199770411242359]
  This paper presents a novel human-centered risk evaluation framework using conjoint analysis to quantify the impact of risk factors, such as surveillance cameras, on attacker's motivation. Our framework calculates risk values incorporating the False Acceptance Rate (FAR) and attack probability, allowing comprehensive comparisons across use cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T14:18:21Z)
• EAIRiskBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [47.69642609574771]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction. Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results. However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges. This study introduces EAIRiskBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• A Framework for Exploring the Consequences of AI-Mediated Enterprise Knowledge Access and Identifying Risks to Workers [3.4568218861862556]
  This paper presents the Consequence-Mechanism-Risk framework to identify risks to workers from AI-mediated enterprise knowledge access systems. We have drawn on wide-ranging literature detailing risks to workers, and categorised risks as being to worker value, power, and wellbeing. Future work could apply this framework to other technological systems to promote the protection of workers and other groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T17:05:40Z)
• Trustworthy Cross-Border Interoperable Identity System for Developing Countries [7.755665174586018]
  Foundational identity systems (FIDS) have been used to optimise service delivery and inclusive economic growth in developing countries. Despite this potential, there has not been any significant research on the interoperability of FIDS in the African identity ecosystem. This research identifies the challenges, opportunities, and requirements for cross-border interoperability in an African context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T11:33:08Z)
• Exploring the Risks and Challenges of National Electronic Identity (NeID) System [8.93312157123729]
  We discuss the different categories of NeID risk and explore the successful deployment of these systems. We highlight the best practices for mitigating risk, including implementing strong security measures, conducting regular risk assessments, and involving stakeholders in the design and implementation of the system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T13:09:50Z)
• Model evaluation for extreme risks [46.53170857607407]
  Further progress in AI development could lead to capabilities that pose extreme risks, such as offensive cyber capabilities or strong manipulation skills. We explain why model evaluation is critical for addressing extreme risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T16:38:43Z)
• Foveate, Attribute, and Rationalize: Towards Physically Safe and Trustworthy AI [76.28956947107372]
  Covertly unsafe text is an area of particular interest, as such text may arise from everyday scenarios and are challenging to detect as harmful. We propose FARM, a novel framework leveraging external knowledge for trustworthy rationale generation in the context of safety. Our experiments show that FARM obtains state-of-the-art results on the SafeText dataset, showing absolute improvement in safety classification accuracy by 5.9%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T17:51:47Z)
• Risk-Driven Design of Perception Systems [47.787943101699966]
  It is important that we design perception systems to minimize errors that reduce the overall safety of the system. We develop a risk-driven approach to designing perception systems that accounts for the effect of perceptual errors on the performance of the fully-integrated, closed-loop system. We evaluate our techniques on a realistic vision-based aircraft detect and avoid application and show that risk-driven design reduces collision risk by 37% over a baseline system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-21T21:14:56Z)
• The Risks of Machine Learning Systems [11.105884571838818]
  A system's overall risk is influenced by its direct and indirect effects. Existing frameworks for ML risk/impact assessment often address an abstract notion of risk or do not concretize this dependence. First-order risks stem from aspects of the ML system, while second-order risks stem from the consequences of first-order risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-21T02:42:10Z)
• Biometrics: Trust, but Verify [49.9641823975828]
  Biometric recognition has exploded into a plethora of different applications around the globe. There are a number of outstanding problems and concerns pertaining to the various sub-modules of biometric recognition systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-14T03:07:25Z)
• Overcoming Failures of Imagination in AI Infused System Development and Deployment [71.9309995623067]
  NeurIPS 2020 requested that research paper submissions include impact statements on "potential nefarious uses and the consequences of failure" We argue that frameworks of harms must be context-aware and consider a wider range of potential stakeholders, system affordances, as well as viable proxies for assessing harms in the widest sense.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-26T18:09:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.