Corrected Bell and Noncontextuality Inequalities for Realistic Experiments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.19383v2
• Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 12:59:08 GMT
• Title: Corrected Bell and Noncontextuality Inequalities for Realistic Experiments
• Authors: Kim Vallée, Pierre-Emmanuel Emeriau, Boris Bourdoncle, Adel Sohbi, Shane Mansfield, Damian Markham,
• Abstract summary: Contextuality is a feature of quantum correlations. It is crucial from a foundational perspective as a nonclassical phenomenon, and from an applied perspective as a resource for quantum advantage. We prove the continuity of a known measure of contextuality, the contextual fraction, which ensures its robustness to noise. We then bound the extent to which these relaxations can account for contextuality, culminating in a notion of genuine contextuality, which is robust to experimental imperfections.
• Score: 1.099532646524593
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Contextuality is a feature of quantum correlations. It is crucial from a foundational perspective as a nonclassical phenomenon, and from an applied perspective as a resource for quantum advantage. It is commonly defined in terms of hidden variables, for which it forces a contradiction with the assumptions of parameter-independence and determinism. The former can be justified by the empirical property of non-signalling or non-disturbance, and the latter by the empirical property of measurement sharpness. However, in realistic experiments neither empirical property holds exactly, which leads to possible objections to contextuality as a form of nonclassicality, and potential vulnerabilities for supposed quantum advantages. We introduce measures to quantify both properties, and introduce quantified relaxations of the corresponding assumptions. We prove the continuity of a known measure of contextuality, the contextual fraction, which ensures its robustness to noise. We then bound the extent to which these relaxations can account for contextuality, via corrections terms to the contextual fraction (or to any noncontextuality inequality), culminating in a notion of genuine contextuality, which is robust to experimental imperfections. We then show that our result is general enough to apply or relate to a variety of established results and experimental setups.

Related papers

• Detecting and Measuring Confounding Using Causal Mechanism Shifts [31.625339624279686]
  Causal sufficiency is both unrealistic and empirically untestable. Existing methods make strong parametric assumptions about the underlying causal generative process to guarantee the identifiability of confounding variables. We propose a comprehensive approach for detecting and measuring confounding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T13:44:22Z)
• The Contextual Fraction as a Measure of Entanglement [0.18130068086063336]
  We first show that any separable state is necessarily non-contextual, regardless of the measurement scenario. For bipartite states we associate a distinguished empirical model and show that the corresponding contextual fraction is positively correlated with the entanglement entropy of the state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T16:50:08Z)
• Causal Discovery via Conditional Independence Testing with Proxy Variables [35.3493980628004]
  The presence of unobserved variables, such as the latent confounder, can introduce bias in conditional independence testing. We propose a novel hypothesis-testing procedure that can effectively examine the existence of the causal relationship over continuous variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-09T09:08:39Z)
• What is nonclassical about uncertainty relations? [0.0]
  Uncertainty relations express limits on the extent to which the outcomes of distinct measurements on a single state can be made jointly predictable. We show that for a class of theories satisfying a particular symmetry property, the functional form of this predictability tradeoff is constrained by noncontextuality to be below a linear curve.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-24T17:19:47Z)
• Experimental Test of Contextuality based on State Discrimination with a Single Qubit [16.530085733940528]
  We extend the scope of experimental test of contextuality to a minimal quantum system of only two states (qubit) We observe a substantial violation of a no-go inequality derived by assuming non-contextuality. We also quantify the contextual advantage of state discrimination and the tolerance against quantum noises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T04:03:04Z)
• Experimentally ruling out joint reality based on operational completeness [20.56996045100972]
  We report a device-independent experiment to confirm that the joint reality of two observables on a single two-level system is incompatible with the assumption of operational completeness. Our results push the fundamental limit to delineate the quantum-classical boundary and pave the way for exploring relevant problems in other scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-10T08:58:28Z)
• Differential Geometry of Contextuality [0.0]
  Contextuality has long been associated with topological properties. We employ the usual identification of states, effects, and transformations as vectors in a vector space and encode them into a tangent space. We discuss how the two views for encoding contextuality relate to interpretations of quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-17T15:49:38Z)
• On Possibilistic Conditions to Contextuality and Nonlocality [0.0]
  We provide some insights into logical contextuality and inequality-free proofs. We show the existence of possibilistic paradoxes whose occurrence is a necessary and sufficient condition for logical contextuality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-08T23:52:40Z)
• Bounding and simulating contextual correlations in quantum theory [0.0]
  We introduce a hierarchy of semidefinite relaxations of the set of quantum correlations in generalised contextuality scenarios. We use it to determine the maximal quantum violation of several noncontextuality inequalities whose maximum violations were previously unknown. We then go further and use it to prove that certain preparation-contextual correlations cannot be explained with pure states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-09T18:19:09Z)
• Experimental certification of nonclassicality via phase-space inequalities [58.720142291102135]
  We present the first experimental implementation of the recently introduced phase-space inequalities for nonclassicality certification. We demonstrate the practicality and sensitivity of this approach by studying nonclassicality of a family of noisy and lossy quantum states of light.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-01T09:03:52Z)
• Fairness Under Feature Exemptions: Counterfactual and Observational Measures [34.5472206536785]
  We propose an information-theoretic decomposition of the total disparity into two components. A non-exempt component quantifies the part that cannot be accounted for by the critical features, and an exempt component quantifies the remaining disparity. We perform case studies to show how one can audit/train models while reducing non-exempt disparity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T19:14:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.