Critical Role of Artificially Intelligent Conversational Chatbot
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.20474v1
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 14:08:07 GMT
- Title: Critical Role of Artificially Intelligent Conversational Chatbot
- Authors: Seraj A. M. Mostafa, Md Z. Islam, Mohammad Z. Islam, Fairose Jeehan,
Saujanna Jafreen, Raihan U. Islam
- Abstract summary: We explore scenarios involving ChatGPT's ethical implications within academic contexts.
We propose architectural solutions aimed at preventing inappropriate use and promoting responsible AI interactions.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Artificially intelligent chatbot, such as ChatGPT, represents a recent and
powerful advancement in the AI domain. Users prefer them for obtaining quick
and precise answers, avoiding the usual hassle of clicking through multiple
links in traditional searches. ChatGPT's conversational approach makes it
comfortable and accessible for finding answers quickly and in an organized
manner. However, it is important to note that these chatbots have limitations,
especially in terms of providing accurate answers as well as ethical concerns.
In this study, we explore various scenarios involving ChatGPT's ethical
implications within academic contexts, its limitations, and the potential
misuse by specific user groups. To address these challenges, we propose
architectural solutions aimed at preventing inappropriate use and promoting
responsible AI interactions.
Related papers
- Exploring ChatGPT's Capabilities on Vulnerability Management [56.4403395100589]
We explore ChatGPT's capabilities on 6 tasks involving the complete vulnerability management process with a large-scale dataset containing 70,346 samples.
One notable example is ChatGPT's proficiency in tasks like generating titles for software bug reports.
Our findings reveal the difficulties encountered by ChatGPT and shed light on promising future directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-11T11:01:13Z) - Comprehensive Assessment of Toxicity in ChatGPT [49.71090497696024]
We evaluate the toxicity in ChatGPT by utilizing instruction-tuning datasets.
prompts in creative writing tasks can be 2x more likely to elicit toxic responses.
Certain deliberately toxic prompts, designed in earlier studies, no longer yield harmful responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-03T14:37:53Z) - Primacy Effect of ChatGPT [69.49920102917598]
We study the primacy effect of ChatGPT: the tendency of selecting the labels at earlier positions as the answer.
We hope that our experiments and analyses provide additional insights into building more reliable ChatGPT-based solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T00:37:28Z) - Evaluating Chatbots to Promote Users' Trust -- Practices and Open
Problems [11.427175278545517]
This paper reviews current practices for testing chatbots.
It identifies gaps as open problems in pursuit of user trust.
It outlines a path forward to mitigate issues of trust related to service or product performance, user satisfaction and long-term unintended consequences for society.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-09T22:40:30Z) - Deceptive AI Ecosystems: The Case of ChatGPT [8.128368463580715]
ChatGPT has gained popularity for its capability in generating human-like responses.
This paper investigates how ChatGPT operates in the real world where societal pressures influence its development and deployment.
We examine the ethical challenges stemming from ChatGPT's deceptive human-like interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-18T10:36:19Z) - Ethical ChatGPT: Concerns, Challenges, and Commandments [5.641321839562139]
This paper highlights specific ethical concerns on ChatGPT and articulates key challenges when ChatGPT is used in various applications.
Practical commandments of ChatGPT are also proposed that can serve as checklist guidelines for those applying ChatGPT in their applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-18T02:04:13Z) - ChatGPT: More than a Weapon of Mass Deception, Ethical challenges and
responses from the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) perspective [0.0]
This article explores the ethical problems arising from the use of ChatGPT as a kind of generative AI.
The main danger ChatGPT presents is the propensity to be used as a weapon of mass deception (WMD)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-06T07:40:12Z) - Let's have a chat! A Conversation with ChatGPT: Technology,
Applications, and Limitations [0.0]
Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer, better known as ChatGPT, can generate human-like sentences and write coherent essays.
Potential applications of ChatGPT in various domains, including healthcare, education, and research, are highlighted.
Despite promising results, there are several privacy and ethical concerns surrounding ChatGPT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-27T14:26:29Z) - A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures [47.64219291655723]
ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, has been trained using massive amounts of data and simulates human conversation.
It has garnered significant attention due to its ability to effectively answer a broad range of human inquiries.
However, a comprehensive analysis of ChatGPT's failures is lacking, which is the focus of this study.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-06T04:21:59Z) - Interacting with Non-Cooperative User: A New Paradigm for Proactive
Dialogue Policy [83.61404191470126]
We propose a new solution named I-Pro that can learn Proactive policy in the Interactive setting.
Specifically, we learn the trade-off via a learned goal weight, which consists of four factors.
The experimental results demonstrate I-Pro significantly outperforms baselines in terms of effectiveness and interpretability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-07T14:11:31Z) - Put Chatbot into Its Interlocutor's Shoes: New Framework to Learn
Chatbot Responding with Intention [55.77218465471519]
This paper proposes an innovative framework to train chatbots to possess human-like intentions.
Our framework included a guiding robot and an interlocutor model that plays the role of humans.
We examined our framework using three experimental setups and evaluate the guiding robot with four different metrics to demonstrated flexibility and performance advantages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-30T15:24:37Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.