When fairness is an abstraction: Equity and AI in Swedish compulsory education

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.01838v1
• Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 10:52:16 GMT
• Title: When fairness is an abstraction: Equity and AI in Swedish compulsory education
• Authors: Marie Utterberg Mod\'en, Marisa Ponti, Johan Lundin, Martin Tallvid (Department of Applied Information Technology, University of Gothenburg, Sweden)
• Abstract summary: Artificial intelligence experts often question whether AI is fair. They view fairness as a property of AI systems rather than of sociopolitical and economic systems. This paper emphasizes the need to be fair in the social, political, and economic contexts within which an educational system operates and uses AI.
• Score: 0.23967405016776386
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence experts often question whether AI is fair. They view fairness as a property of AI systems rather than of sociopolitical and economic systems. This paper emphasizes the need to be fair in the social, political, and economic contexts within which an educational system operates and uses AI. Taking Swedish decentralized compulsory education as the context, this paper examines whether and how the use of AI envisaged by national authorities and edtech companies exacerbates unfairness. A qualitative content analysis of selected Swedish policy documents and edtech reports was conducted using the concept of relevant social groups to understand how different groups view the risks and benefits of AI for fairness. Three groups that view efficiency as a key value of AI are identified, and interpreted as economical, pedagogical and accessibility-related. By separating fairness from social justice, this paper challenges the notion of fairness as the formal equality of opportunities.

Related papers

• Exploiting the Margin: How Capitalism Fuels AI at the Expense of Minoritized Groups [0.0]
  This paper explores the relationship between capitalism, racial injustice, and artificial intelligence (AI) It argues that AI acts as a contemporary vehicle for age-old forms of exploitation. The paper promotes an approach that integrates social justice and equity into the core of technological design and policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-10T22:40:07Z)
• Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
  "Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
• FATE in AI: Towards Algorithmic Inclusivity and Accessibility [0.0]
  To prevent algorithmic disparities, fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics (FATE) in AI are being implemented. This study examines FATE-related desiderata, particularly transparency and ethics, in areas of the global South that are underserved by AI. To promote inclusivity, a community-led strategy is proposed to collect and curate representative data for responsible AI design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-03T15:08:10Z)
• Causal Fairness Analysis [68.12191782657437]
  We introduce a framework for understanding, modeling, and possibly solving issues of fairness in decision-making settings. The main insight of our approach will be to link the quantification of the disparities present on the observed data with the underlying, and often unobserved, collection of causal mechanisms. Our effort culminates in the Fairness Map, which is the first systematic attempt to organize and explain the relationship between different criteria found in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-23T01:06:34Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
• Toward a Theory of Justice for Artificial Intelligence [2.28438857884398]
  It holds that the basic structure of society should be understood as a composite of socio-technical systems. As a consequence, egalitarian norms of justice apply to the technology when it is deployed in these contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-27T13:23:38Z)
• Fairness as Equality of Opportunity: Normative Guidance from Political Philosophy [8.228275343025462]
  We introduce a taxonomy of fairness ideals using doctrines of Equality of Opportunity (EOP) from political philosophy. We clarify their conceptions in philosophy and the proposed codification in fair machine learning. We use our fairness-as-EOP framework to re-interpret the impossibility results from a philosophical perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-15T16:07:58Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• The AI Economist: Improving Equality and Productivity with AI-Driven Tax Policies [119.07163415116686]
  We train social planners that discover tax policies that can effectively trade-off economic equality and productivity. We present an economic simulation environment that features competitive pressures and market dynamics. We show that AI-driven tax policies improve the trade-off between equality and productivity by 16% over baseline policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-28T06:57:18Z)
• Getting Fairness Right: Towards a Toolbox for Practitioners [2.4364387374267427]
  The potential risk of AI systems unintentionally embedding and reproducing bias has attracted the attention of machine learning practitioners and society at large. This paper proposes to draft a toolbox which helps practitioners to ensure fair AI practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-15T20:53:50Z)
• Learning from Learning Machines: Optimisation, Rules, and Social Norms [91.3755431537592]
  It appears that the area of AI that is most analogous to the behaviour of economic entities is that of morally good decision-making. Recent successes of deep learning for AI suggest that more implicit specifications work better than explicit ones for solving such problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-29T17:42:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.