High Precision Causal Model Evaluation with Conditional Randomization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.01902v1
• Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 13:22:27 GMT
• Title: High Precision Causal Model Evaluation with Conditional Randomization
• Authors: Chao Ma, Cheng Zhang
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel low-variance estimator for causal error, dubbed as the pairs estimator. By applying the same IPW estimator to both the model and true experimental effects, our estimator effectively cancels out the variance due to IPW and achieves a smaller variance. Our method offers a simple yet powerful solution to evaluate causal inference models in conditional randomization settings without complicated modification of the IPW estimator itself.
• Score: 10.23470075454725
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The gold standard for causal model evaluation involves comparing model predictions with true effects estimated from randomized controlled trials (RCT). However, RCTs are not always feasible or ethical to perform. In contrast, conditionally randomized experiments based on inverse probability weighting (IPW) offer a more realistic approach but may suffer from high estimation variance. To tackle this challenge and enhance causal model evaluation in real-world conditional randomization settings, we introduce a novel low-variance estimator for causal error, dubbed as the pairs estimator. By applying the same IPW estimator to both the model and true experimental effects, our estimator effectively cancels out the variance due to IPW and achieves a smaller asymptotic variance. Empirical studies demonstrate the improved of our estimator, highlighting its potential on achieving near-RCT performance. Our method offers a simple yet powerful solution to evaluate causal inference models in conditional randomization settings without complicated modification of the IPW estimator itself, paving the way for more robust and reliable model assessments.

Related papers

• Deep Learning Methods for the Noniterative Conditional Expectation G-Formula for Causal Inference from Complex Observational Data [3.0958655016140892]
  The g-formula can be used to estimate causal effects of sustained treatment strategies using observational data. Parametric models are subject to model misspecification, which may result in biased causal estimates. We propose a unified deep learning framework for the NICE g-formula estimator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T21:00:46Z)
• Prognostic Covariate Adjustment for Logistic Regression in Randomized Controlled Trials [1.5020330976600735]
  We show that prognostic score adjustment can increase the power of the Wald test for the conditional odds ratio under a fixed sample size. We utilize g-computation to expand the scope of prognostic score adjustment to inferences on the marginal risk difference, relative risk, and odds ratio estimands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T06:53:16Z)
• Robust Estimation of Causal Heteroscedastic Noise Models [7.568978862189266]
  Student's $t$-distribution is known for its robustness in accounting for sampling variability with smaller sample sizes and extreme values without significantly altering the overall distribution shape. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate that our estimators are more robust and achieve better overall performance across synthetic and real benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T02:26:35Z)
• Scalable method for Bayesian experimental design without integrating over posterior distribution [0.0]
  We address the computational efficiency in solving the A-optimal Bayesian design of experiments problems. A-optimality is a widely used and easy-to-interpret criterion for Bayesian experimental design. This study presents a novel likelihood-free approach to the A-optimal experimental design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-30T12:40:43Z)
• The Implicit Delta Method [61.36121543728134]
  In this paper, we propose an alternative, the implicit delta method, which works by infinitesimally regularizing the training loss of uncertainty. We show that the change in the evaluation due to regularization is consistent for the variance of the evaluation estimator, even when the infinitesimal change is approximated by a finite difference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T19:34:17Z)
• Benign-Overfitting in Conditional Average Treatment Effect Prediction with Linear Regression [14.493176427999028]
  We study the benign overfitting theory in the prediction of the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) with linear regression models. We show that the T-learner fails to achieve the consistency except the random assignment, while the IPW-learner converges the risk to zero if the propensity score is known.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-10T18:51:52Z)
• Comparing Probability Distributions with Conditional Transport [63.11403041984197]
  We propose conditional transport (CT) as a new divergence and approximate it with the amortized CT (ACT) cost. ACT amortizes the computation of its conditional transport plans and comes with unbiased sample gradients that are straightforward to compute. On a wide variety of benchmark datasets generative modeling, substituting the default statistical distance of an existing generative adversarial network with ACT is shown to consistently improve the performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-28T05:14:22Z)
• Increasing the efficiency of randomized trial estimates via linear adjustment for a prognostic score [59.75318183140857]
  Estimating causal effects from randomized experiments is central to clinical research. Most methods for historical borrowing achieve reductions in variance by sacrificing strict type-I error rate control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-17T21:10:10Z)
• Improving Maximum Likelihood Training for Text Generation with Density Ratio Estimation [51.091890311312085]
  We propose a new training scheme for auto-regressive sequence generative models, which is effective and stable when operating at large sample space encountered in text generation. Our method stably outperforms Maximum Likelihood Estimation and other state-of-the-art sequence generative models in terms of both quality and diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-12T15:31:24Z)
• Efficient Ensemble Model Generation for Uncertainty Estimation with Bayesian Approximation in Segmentation [74.06904875527556]
  We propose a generic and efficient segmentation framework to construct ensemble segmentation models. In the proposed method, ensemble models can be efficiently generated by using the layer selection method. We also devise a new pixel-wise uncertainty loss, which improves the predictive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-21T16:08:38Z)
• SUMO: Unbiased Estimation of Log Marginal Probability for Latent Variable Models [80.22609163316459]
  We introduce an unbiased estimator of the log marginal likelihood and its gradients for latent variable models based on randomized truncation of infinite series. We show that models trained using our estimator give better test-set likelihoods than a standard importance-sampling based approach for the same average computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T11:49:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.